Homework Clifton Parker Analysis

769 Words2 Pages

Homework can have a negative effect on students because of the time it takes away from social lives and extracurricular activities that are vital to students futures. The articles “The Value is Homework: Are teachers assigning too much homework?” by Raychelle Cassada Lohmann, “Research Trends: Why Homework Should Be Balanced” by Youki Terada, and “Stanford research shows pitfalls of homework” by Clifton B. Parker, all describe their opinions about the negative effects of having too much homework. These authors also mention their thoughts on how many hours of homework should be given each night, and what the purpose of homework should be. While all articles analyze the pros and cons of homework, Parker uses the most precise facts and has the strongest argument against homework. …show more content…

Compared to the other authors, Parker gives more facts and details about the negative effects homework has on students lives. She explains how “Pope and her colleagues found that too much homework can diminish its effectiveness and even be counterproductive.” Parker gives many other facts and details that support this claim. She provides the statistic that “56 percent of the students considered homework a primary source of stress.” With the tremendous amount of homework that students are required to do they have no time to spend with their families or friends, or participate in any extracurricular activities. Parkers’ article is also better organized than the other articles because she begins talking about the “pitfalls of homework,” and follows it with statistical facts supporting it. She then follows with her opinion about how homework and learning other skills should be balanced and then the positive outcomes of allowing that to

Open Document