Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Importance of building team cohesion
Group dynamics strengths
Discuss the principles of group dynamics
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Importance of building team cohesion
WHAT ABOUT GROUP COHESION?
Group cohesion is a widely studied construct in the group dynamics literature. Extensive literature studies show that there is a lack of consistency and agreement regarding the construct and its use among the researchers who have created this literature (Friedkin, 2004;Greer, 2012). Despite the large pool of literature on the construct, there is still a divergent opinion on its nature, typology and its effect on performance and productivity. Group cohesion research has continued to generate interest and popularity (Greer 2012) as a widely studied construct in academic literature.
The group cohesion–group performance relationship has been studied extensively and findings by early researchers did not present a methodical connection linking performance and cohesion (Forsyth, 1990; Stogdill, 1972).Though two meta-analytic studies asserted that positive relationship between group cohesion and group performance existed minimally (Evans& Dion, 1991; Mullen & Copper, 1994). However, subsequent studies differed with these meta-analyses on whether the cohesion-performance relationship was moderated by other variables such as level of analysis, task interdependency, goal acceptance, and group norm (Gully, Devine, &Whitney, 1995; Langfred, 2000; Podsakoff, Mackenzie, & Ahearn, 1997).
One explanation for this uncertainty in the literature was the non-uniformity in the definitions and measurements of cohesion and performance (Cota, Evans, Dion, Kilik, & Longman, 1995; Mudrack, 1989a, 1989b). The context of group cohesion remains broad and researchers have
continued to propose varied definitions and conceptual models of group cohesion. For instance, group cohesion was defined as the “total field of forces causing...
... middle of paper ...
...ng the group within three weeks. This finding leads one to question the role of performance during the first week following a group’s formation. Taylor, Castore and Tyler (1983) examined how
performance may be upheld when groups experience success or failure. They observed that the impact negative performance feedback has on cohesion is dependent upon the attributions group members make about the causes for failure. Attributions can be described as the explanations people formulate regarding their own and others’ behavior (Taylor et al. 1983).
Their data demonstrated that cohesion may remain high, despite repeated failure and little success. This may be due to group-serving attribution biases. However, there appears to be limited research examining the role of initial levels of group cohesion and the impact the performance has on later levels of group cohesion.
Group cohesion is defined as a dynamic process “which is reflected in the tendency for a group to stick together and remain united in the pursuit of its instrumental objectives” (Carron et al., 1985). Literature in to the field of group cohesion is vast Levi, (2001) Discusses group cohesion and refers to the interpersonal bonds that mould a group together. Several various theorists feel that the fundamental components of group cohesion is that of a feeling of belonging or social identity (Lott & Lott 1965:- Hogg 1992)
The group has reached the Norming stage when they begin the second stage. “The team is faced with creating cohesion and unity, differentiating roles, identifying expectation for members, and enhancing commitment. Providing supportive feedback and fostering commitment to a vision are ne...
In conclusion, team cohesion is still a difficult concept to pin down, but I believe the definition is a multi-faceted one where many factors to contribute to group cohesion. In addition, it is my belief that conflict or performance of an objective can either create cohesion or a stronger group bond. However team cohesion is achieved by the organization, it is how well the team contributes to the overall good of the group that the better the group will perform, which in turns has a positive effect on overall organizational goals.
According to Coleman & James (1961) ‘cohesion tends to be weaker and moral tends to be lower in a larger group than in a smaller one.’ The reason they state this happens is because, in the majority of cases there is a lack of intimacy within the group and in extremely large groups the members are almost strangers to one another.
It is proven that teams who work well together perform and have a higher rate of success compared to teams who do not work well together or communicate with each other. A recent article with regards to leadership discussed the topic of group cohesion and how this is a factor for success. The article discussed several situations, one about a business company, one about a sports team and one about a military operation. The article closely analyzed the leaders of the three situations and discussed the similarities and differences between the three. The main similarity between was there focus on cohesion. The article contained facts about how the business was operating and how that in recent years, production and sales as increased drastically, and one factor for this increase was the CEO implemented a mandatory team building exercise each
In order to evaluate my role within the group it is important to identify what makes a group. A group must firstly consist of more than three members, “Two members have personal relationships; with three or more there is a change in quality” of the personal relationship. (Bion 1961, p26) The group must have a common purpose or a goal in order to succeed.
Stewart, G., Manz, C., & Sims, H., (1999). Teamwork and Group Dynamics. New York: Wiley. pp. 70- 125.
The Importance of Group Work in Today's Organizations. It could be argued that in order to be successful, modern organisations must actively develop strong and cohesive work groups. Why do you need to be a member? Is it true that there is no room for the individual in today’s organisation? The rapid progression and improvement in information and communication technology has led to modern organisations finding new ways to work.
According to Toseland and Rivas (2005), group dynamics are “the forces that result from the interactions of group members” (p. 64). These forces refer to either the negative or positive influences towards meeting members’ socioemotional needs as well as goal attainment within a group (Toseland & Rivas, 2005), like within my class work group experience. Some of dynamics that continue to emerge and develop in my group is the effective interaction patterns and strong group cohesion, which has generated positive outcomes and group achievement thus far.
Good team cohesion will increase chances of successfully completing the goal with high performance. The team will trust each other and support. This would make work faster and more effective.
One model for understanding group development is the five-stage group development model which states that groups go through five stages of forming, storming, norming, performing and adjourning (Gibson, el at., 2009). In addition, the model suggests that groups can be in several stages at one time and do not have to move through the stages linearly (Gibson, el at., 2009). While this model has been widely used by individuals, in the study of group dynamics, there is no imperial evidence that this model accurately describes group development (Tuckman & Jensen, 2010). In addition, there is some concern that the model is to static and unrealistic in its explanation of group formation (Gibson, el at., 2009). Another model for group development is the punctuated equilibrium model that suggests that there are only three phases (Gibson, el a...
Work groups have a great impact upon the attitude and the conduct of group members. The group with high cohesiveness has more “we” feeling rather than “I” feeling. There is more cooperation and positive work environment when the group has high cohesiveness. The researchers are also trying to explore if this kind of cohesive behavior on groups have any impact upon the citizenship behavior they show. Cartwright (1968) observed that the cohesiveness has a positive impact upon intragroup communication, favorable interpersonal evaluation, and also it influence higher OCB if it matches with the group norms.
Principals of Group Dynamics With Thomason Health System establishing an on-boarding team to facilitate the implementation of an electronic medical record system, it is important to take into consideration group dynamics. Groups can be made up of different individuals that are coming together to accomplish a specific goal. " Group dynamics" refers to the attitudinal and behavioral characteristics of a group. Group dynamics concern how groups form, their structure and process, and how they function" (Advameg, n.d.) In developing teams it is a good idea to have a basic sense of the various stages that occur when establishing a team and having awareness throughout the stages helps leadership understand the reasons for team members behaviors that occurred throughout each stage and helps guide these members to moving onto the next stage.
Lastly, the reflection back is very important to the corrective emotional experience. What I found useful about group cohesiveness is knowing that you are never alone at first; the members feel alone, but they are others who have gone through the same things they have. Group cohesiveness gives members a sense that they belong and are welcomed. The group members are initially very supportive and accepting of new and old members.
When analyzing a group and its development, there are several points to consider. The greater the similarity in member attitudes and values brought to the group, the greater the likelihood of cohesion in the group. Group cohesion will be increased by success in achieving the groups’ goals, low frequency of required external interactions and under conditions of abundant resources.