Good And Evil In William Golding's Lord Of The Flies

938 Words2 Pages

Throughout the novel, Lord of the Flies, the characters display a variety of good and evil. Goulding uses the actions of Ralph, Jack, and Simon to illustrate the nature of good and evil which is present in everyone.
Ralph is shown as an overall good character who leads the boys in times of desperate measures. Goulding chooses to depict Ralph as a good character though these actions. Rarely does Golding show the evil side of Ralph. We see him building shelters for the kids on the island. He barely even knows these kids and is helping them while they lounge and eat Golding also shows him as the leader of the group who helps create order and maintain leadership. At a meeting of the boys Ralph suggested, “‘give the conch to the next person to speak. He can hold it when he’s speaking”’ (Golding 50). These ground rules help to keep order and show Ralph is doing what he can to help the boys get off the island. As a meeting was taking place Ralph suggests, “‘A fire. Make a fire”’ (Golding 38). This is what kept the idea of survival in his eyes lit. He was intrigued by the idea; which kept a sense of survival close. Golding mainly reveals the good in Ralph which is why there are so many actions to support his moral value. He can also be viewed as evil through few of his actions. (Oldsey)
Ralph’s evil is few and far between but, is still shown in Lord of the Flies. In the very beginning of the book Piggy and Ralph meet in the beginning of the book and Piggy specifically says to not tell anyone his name because people would make fun of him. Of course Ralph told the group which displays his evil inside him. More evil comes out in Ralph when he takes part in the killing of Simon. Ralph was caught in the moment when Simon stumbled into the g...

... middle of paper ...

...ction in the whole novel. Also Simons first instinct is to help which is why he is guided by impulse to do good; it comes naturally to him.
The evil inside all of the boys is what causes them to show actions of evil. It causes people to think maybe the beast is a representation of the evil inside them. Simon states, “‘maybe it’s [the beast] only us”’ (Golding 89). This backs up the idea that the beast could potentially be the evil. Arnold states in his article, “The beast is an externalization of the inner darkness in the children’s (man’s) nature” (Johnston). This justifies the idea that the beast is the evil inside of them. The beast is just a way of putting their evil into a figure. They use the beast and other objects like the parachutist to let evil take over them. The evil in them is shown through figures that the boys are taken over by fear of. (Johnston)

Open Document