Evil In Lord Of The Flies Analysis

696 Words2 Pages

The Psychology of Evil Demonstrated in Lord of the Flies The psychology of evil is vital to understanding why Jack and Ralph progress through the story as they do. In Lord of the Flies, evil is an undoubted key to life on the island. The main characters in William Golding’s Lord of the Flies demonstrate Zimbardo’s “Seven Social Processes that Grease the Slippery Slope of Evil,” most notable mindlessly taking the first step, blind obedience to authority, and de-individualization of self. In the novel, Jack, more so than the other boys, mindlessly takes the first step towards evil. Mindlessly taking the first step is commonly known as “evil starts out small” (Tomasulo). Jack demonstrates one minuscule first step by possessing a knife before the boys crash onto the island. This shows that Jack was violent before the crash. Jack also forced his choir boys to march through the dense tropical heat in their long black cloaks. In this instance, Jack shows that he is unsympathetic towards the feelings of the other boys. Jack …show more content…

De-individualization of self is generally considered as making oneself anonymous. In Jack’s tribe, you must paint your face. Jack is the force of evil, conflicting with Ralph, the force of good. The face paint distinctly distinguishes between the forces of good and evil, while also creating the sense of anonymity that is often necessary to do evil. Daniel Tomasulo describes anonymity in the terms “When we are anonymous, we are more violent” (Tomasulo). Jack and his tribe turn fully savage once their faces are painted. With this newfound sense of anonymity, the tribe hunts pig, kills Piggy, kills Simon, and even tries to hunt Ralph. To unknowingly make the acts of evil easier, the boys paint their faces, thus allowing them to possibly feel as if they are entirely someone else. Anonymity, or de-individualization of self, is a pronounced process in Lord of the

Open Document