Are Humans Inherently Evil In Lord Of The Flies Analysis

1047 Words3 Pages

Are humans inherently evil? Is society just a ticking time bomb, waiting to explode at the first sign of trouble? William Golding, author of Lord of the Flies, uses a simple story of a group of boys stranded on an island to show a small society can go from functional to dysfunctional overnight. Golding indicates that human nature is inherently evil by using characters, symbols, and conflicts to demonstrate how easily a society can fail without order and strong leadership. In this novel, one can see, through the development of each character, the role that each one will hold in the story. Golding uses each strong character development of each boy to represent the different qualities a society might possess. Ralph, who is introduced first in …show more content…

Probably the most obvious symbol is the beast. The beast represents the evil that is inside every human. Fear of the beast puts the boys at odds with each other and leads them to fighting and blaming one another. The story shows us how much power the beast held over the boys because of the fear it created. Much like modern society’s fear of not eating, not having shelter, not having warmth, might lead people to hurt others. The opposite side of the beast is goodness and order. Golding uses the conch that Ralph finds to represent this aspect of civilization. While the boys possess the conch there will be order and authority. It is not until Jack loses control, and anarchy takes over, that the conch loses its authority. When the conch is broken this represents the collapse of any chance at democracy and order. This loss of order is show when Golding writes, "Ralph, thinking to himself: "What was the sensible thing to do? There was no Piggy to talk sense. There was no solemn assembly for debate nor dignity of the conch” (196). After the conch was broken, the last hope the boys had was the signal fire. During the story, Ralph is persistent about keeping the fire alive and not letting it get out of control. When Jack takes over and the fire is only used for cooking meat it seems that all hope is lost. Irony is represented when the officer arrives in the story and says, “We …show more content…

man, but also man vs. society and man vs. nature. Firstly, it is instinct for the boys to try to survive on the island. This represents man vs. nature. They are trying to survive in harsh conditions while encountering what they call the beast. Man vs. society shows itself through Ralph trying to get everyone to work together to have some semblance of civilization, but he is constantly being shot down because of laziness or differing opinions of the other boys. When anarchy takes over and the beast is no controlling the boys the reader begins to see man vs. man. After the boys were on Jack’s side of the island they were in a frenzied state when they mistook Simon for the beast, shouting, “Kill the beast! Cut his throat! Spill his blood! Do him in!” (152). This conflict of man vs man is what led to the murders of two boys on the island. While reading this story the reader is driven to cheer on Ralph for his good nature and strong leadership role. However, towards the end when even he joins in for the death of Simon shows the reader how even the good ones seem to be evil by nature. Although Ralph did his best to focus on getting off the island by using a signal fire, he probably should have stayed more focused in the beginning instead of adventuring with the others. Perhaps if he had been a stronger leader, more focused on keeping order and maintaining a civilized culture, then they could stayed functional on the

Open Document