Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Characterization and conclusions gone girl
Gone girl film analysis essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Characterization and conclusions gone girl
Picture for a moment, the morning of your 5th anniversary your wife goes missing, or what cops suspect was a murder. Automatically, you, the husband, are assumed guilty. Now, before you start expecting the routine dull ending: the husband is proven innocent and the cops find the wife, and they live happily ever after. Just stop! This movie is entirely different and unique. Gone Girl takes you on a wild roller coaster of disturbing, yet intriguing twist and turns, played by the perfect cast. Picture for a moment, the morning of your 5th anniversary your wife goes missing, or what cops suspect was a murder. Automatically, you, the husband, is assumed guilty. Now, before you start expecting the routine, dull ending: the husband is proven innocent and the cops find the wife, and they live happily ever after. Just stop! This movie is entirely different and unique. Gone Girl takes you on a wild roller coaster of disturbing, yet intriguing twist and turns, played by the perfect cast. As you may know, the movie is based off a novel. Unlike majority of novel-based films, Gone Girl follows the sequence of events chronologically how they occurred in the book. Every small detail was followed perfectly. …show more content…
Not one character stood out from the other, because each actor had their moments and spotlight. In addition the actors were properly dressed and equipped to match their roles, as described in the novel. That's not all though. The actors are phenomenal at what they do. Nick Dunne, played by Ben Affleck, captured his character as a lost, confused, emotionally detached perfect husband. Then there’s Rosamund Pike, who plays Amazing Amy, otherwise known as Amy Elliott. She mastered her role as a psychotic, uptight, devil minded perfect wife. Without the actors truly understanding and performing their roles the way they did, the plot would not be able to
While watching the movie, I could see that the main characters in the book, both their names and traits, were the same in both the movie and book. However, aside from that there were many different as...
One of the main products of this movie that popped out to me was the stars. They all seemed to be great actors even though I only knew one of them. For example, I thought that Ian Michael Smith did a great job portraying Simon Birch. He made the movie cute and funny all at once. I also thought that Joseph Mazello did a great job portraying relatable feelings in the movie. You could tell by his facial expressions what his mood was. All the actors did a great job and I can’t pinpoint one of them who did worse than the
Overall, the actors chosen to play each role were well picked. All of them portrayed the role they were supposed to very well. In particular, I think the best two were Ruby Archuleta and Ladd Devine. Ruby is a strong character in general, with obvious weaknesses, like her stubbornness in what may not have been the best times to be stubborn, making her well rounded. Ladd Devine is a good ‘villain’.
Even though this movie is based in real events, but some scene that appear in the film it just give the movie more action and drama. Alan Parker and the writer Chris Gerolmo wanted to the viewers and critics to be able to think and analyze the movie. I think they added other actors to make the movie intense and to add talk about scene. From experience this was an outstanding film.
Mainly all the characters were as I pictured them from the novel, especially George and Lennie. The actors played very convincing roles and I think the casting was excellent. Another thing the film did very well was setting the scene and quickly giving the characters backstories. As well as the backstories there was also very clever foreshadowing. After the incident in weed George and Lennie escaped in the back of an empty freight carriage on a moving train. And at the end of the film after murdering Lennie it shows George leaving in an empty freight carriage on a moving train. This is a very clever technique used by the author to make the audience
No one could have played Rex better than Woody Harrelson. The director did a respectable job of casting people who would have looked like the author described them in the book. Overall, the movie did a fantastic job of portraying the major events and showing the overall theme of the book. Watching the movie, you notice a few differences. For example, Lori has glasses on and in the book, she did not get glasses until later in the story.
Some actors in this movie do a good job of portraying their character. However, a few take away from the overall experience, such as Tony Ross and Claudia McNeil. Tony Ross, who is an actor known for Pancho Villa, plays Stacey Logan. Claudia McNeil was an actress known for her role in Raisen in the Sun, and she portrays Big Ma. Both of these
Their acting chops were very impressive whether it was comedic, emotional, or just stunning overall. Yet, on the other hand, some minor characters weren’t as well heard as others. I feel as the play could be better if some of the minor characters had projected their voice more, allowing their character to be known. However, although some voices were much stronger than others, all actors were full of talent, capable of dealing with script’s requirements, and did a good job
Throughout her entire life Amy, the main character in Gone Girl’s movie adaptation, was faced with unobtainable standards that were impossible to reach. This is enough to drive even the strongest of people mad. Due to her parents novel of “Amazing Amy”, she was forced to play the part of the cool girl, and never truly was able to express herself throughout her life. The only part of the novel that truly occurred was that both versions of “Amy” were married. She would go to great lengths to express herself as an individual.
Another character who was portrayed differently was Johnny Cade. In the movie he seemed a lot more timid and scared. The book had a sort of blossoming in Johnny’s attitude from afraid to determined and
The casting of both Leonardo DiCaprio and fresh-faced Claire Danes influence how the film is viewed. Baz Luhrmann is smart in using young, attractive characters to make the adaptation more appealing to a more adolescent
All characters in the movie were played well by the actors in my opinion. They
It was a thrilling story to follow and it left me guessing until the end. The only thing I did not like was how all of the exciting material did not happen until the very end. The realization of who the kidnapper was the last thing to happen and nothing else happened after that. I also enjoyed how the story was written. The author’s way of writing was easy to read. I would read multiple chapters at a time because I never found a good place to stop. I recommend this book to others. It is a great mystery story and is very interesting. Others also believe the same thing. For example, Heather Gudenkauf, a New York Times bestselling author called the novel, “A heart-stopping thriller that had me guessing to the very end.” I rate Girl Last Seen a 8.5 out of
The Birlings are holding a party to celebrate their daughter’s engagement with Gerald Croft. The pleasant scene is interrupted when a rather shady looking Inspector gives them a visit, investigating the suicide of a young working-class girl in her middle twenties. Each family member is interrogated and they all find out that they are somehow linked to the girl’s death.
Beauty and the Beast is a traditional fairy tale written by French novelist Gabrielle-Suzanne Barbot de Villeneuve and published in 1740 in La Jeune Américaine et les contes marins. Her lengthy version was abridged, rewritten, and published by Jeanne-Marie Leprince de Beaumont in 1756 in Magasin des enfants to produce the version most commonly retold. In France, for example, Zémire et Azor is an operatic version of the story, written by Marmontel and composed by Grétry in 1771, which had enormous success well into the 19th century; it is based on the second version of the tale. Amour pour amour, by Nivelle de la Chaussée, is a 1742 play based on Gabrielle-Suzanne Barbot de Villeneuve's version. According to researchers at universities in