Global Shark Attack Observational Study

582 Words2 Pages

Often when people go swimming at the beach, they are afraid of the possible risk of shark attacks. However, are these fears reasonable, or do people mistakenly believe that shark attacks worldwide are much more prevalent than they truly are? In this project, we will conduct an observational study to examine data on non-fatal unprovoked shark attacks that occurred globally in 2015. The data we will be examining comes from the Shark Attack Database which uses the Global Shark Attack File (GSAF), a spreadsheet of human/shark interactions compiled by the Shark Research Institute. This data is important because it will evaluate whether shark attacks worldwide are a common occurrence or are relatively rare.

There are no outliers below the lower fence, however there are 15 outliers that fall above the upper fence: the United States, which had 1,476 shark attacks, Australia, which had 633, South Africa, which had 297, Papua New Guinea, which had 63, Brazil, which had 56, New Zealand, which had 55, Unknown, which had 44, The Bahamas, which had 64, Mexico, …show more content…

The IQR is 7 shark attacks. The median number of shark attacks worldwide was 2 shark attacks. There are several abnormalities in the distribution of the data such as a tail starting from approximately 100 shark attacks and ending at approximately 1500 shark attacks. This indicates that the countries with these number of shark attacks in 2015 are potential outliers (discussed in detail above). There are also several gaps in the distribution. They occurred at approximately 100 to 250 attacks, 450 to 600 attacks, and 750 to 1,300 attacks. This shows that generally, shark attacks were a relatively infrequent occurrence worldwide in 2015 and they only occurred at “high” frequencies, which are really not all that high, in a very small number of

More about Global Shark Attack Observational Study

Open Document