Glaucon Vs Socrates

808 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Importance of education in ones life

The passage is a conversation between Socrates and Glaucon regarding how a Republic should be ruled. Glaucon listens intently while Socrates articulates his ideas regarding, philosophy, wisdom, and fundamental values of creating a republic. Clearly, Socrates knows in reality that what you desire is not always what you achieve. The two agree they may have to be content with less than perfection
Socrates puts forth the idea that a Republic should be ruled by philosophers, or kings should pursue wisdom. He believed that a ruler must possess both political power and a love of wisdom in order to create a true republic. Those that did not possess both these qualities should be excluded from ruling as it would lead to corruption as it had in existing …show more content…

A philosopher is someone who loves wisdom, not just part of it, but all of it. A true philosopher feels he has never attained enough knowledge or wisdom. He is always curious, wants to learn more and is anxious to know the truth. He can never get his fill of knowledge, wisdom, and truth.
Socrates attempts to clarify a real philosopher from one who only resembles one. Their dialogue includes philosophical discussions regarding opinion and knowledge; beauty and ugliness; justice and injustice; goodness and badness; and the distinctions between them and how they manifest in actions verses appearance. This is how Socrates, distinguishes those who love of spectacle and crave action, “dilettantes”; from those who love wisdom,” or philosophers.
Socrates and Glaucon try to think of ways to approach the subject at hand, the rule of a republic, with those in power without raising resentment, quarrels and anger. They must be gentle. No one embraces the suggestion that they are wrong in their opinion. It would be best to pacify the people by making them feel that their opinions are important. Nonetheless, Socrates equates opinions as, “an intermediate between knowledge and …show more content…

I had no background knowledge or information on the subject, little of the dialogue made sense, and although I had heard of Plato and Socrates, I knew very little about them. However, after some research regarding the names mentioned, and the time frame, reading of the passage became easier and more understandable.
I agree with most of Socrates’ concepts, however I don’t believe that a true republic, as he imagined it, can ever be established by man here on earth. His belief in philosophy and man’s ability to acquire wisdom as the answer to most all questions is at odds with my Christian beliefs. Man will never have the wisdom to govern in the manner Socrates describes. We know that as the Bible states in Psa_111:10 The fear of the LORD is the beginning of Wisdom: a good understanding have all they that do His commandments: His praise endureth

Show More
Related

  • Unpopularity In Alain De Botton's The Consolations Of Philosophy

    589 Words  | 2 Pages

    Alain de Botton commences the section by delineating the story of how Socrates became the figure he became. Socrates lived a lifestyle in which he did things that he thought were correct and did not worry much about approval from society. de Botton states, “every society has notions of what one should believe and how one should behave in order to avoid suspicion and unpopularity” (9). In other words, de Botton believes that society has placed views for people to know what is right and what is wrong. People will submit to conformity by behaving in ways that people will view as “acceptable”.

    Read More

  • Comparing Thoreau and Socrates

    341 Words  | 1 Pages

    Neither of these works are a plan for a government. They are both written as a response to the conflict of personal needs with the needs of society as a whole. Socrates lived in a very homogeneous society controlled by land-owning adult men. Women, children and slaves were not involved in government, and not even allowed to leave the city if they wanted.

    Read More

  • Euthyphro, by Plato

    871 Words  | 2 Pages

    Consequently, In Plato's Euthyphro, our acquaintance with Socrates is immensely beneficial to society, as we obtain awareness on such an innovative method of achieving intuition. The Socratic approach is now a fundamental approach implemented in daily conversation in society Furthermore, not only is Socrates is able to verify that the true seekers are the wise; he also validates the notion that the answers to many questions are merely questions. Simply because, life is so debate that certain subjects begin to intertwine. To sum up, Plato's Euthyphro is extremely indicative of this Socratic irony, for the reason being that: Socrates's portrays a sense of intellectual humility.

    Read More

  • Glaucon's Challenge and Plato's Theory of Justice in Plato's Republic

    1807 Words  | 4 Pages

    ...cting unjustly. Therefore, justice is determined to be intrinsically valuable from the negative intrinsic value of injustice that was demonstrated, as well as from parts of the soul working together correctly. Glaucon also wants Plato to show that a just life is better than an unjust life. It has been shown that when the soul is in harmony, it only acts justly. It is in a person’s best interests to have a healthy soul, which is a just soul, so that the person can be truly happy. This means that by showing justice has an intrinsic value, it can also be concluded that it is better to live a just life opposed to an unjust life. The conclusion that I have drawn is that Plato’s argument against the intrinsic value of injustice is sufficient to prove that the just life is superior, even if the unjust life may be more profitable.

    Read More

  • Similarities Between Socrates And Machiavelli's Prince

    1209 Words  | 3 Pages

    Socrates would view Machiavelli’s concept of a Prince as unethical, as he would not approve of a Prince to exercise absolute power over the people. The concept of an ideal ruler and political system is highly subjective. In every society of our world since ancient times, there have been disagreements over how that society should be effectively governed. It is especially crucial in times of hardship to have the most proficient political system. Machiavelli and Socrates both lived in times of political fragmentation and uncertainty. The Prince and The Last Days of Socrates advocate for differing ideology of ruling.

    Read More

  • Socrates Unjust Legal System

    1230 Words  | 3 Pages

    This paper highlights a few fallacies that surround Socrates’ ideas about acting against unjust government.

    Read More

  • Aristocracy in Plato's The Republic and to Build a Democratic State

    531 Words  | 2 Pages

    In The Republic by Plato, Plato constructed an ideal city where Philosophers would rule. Governed by an aristocratic form of government, it took away some of the most basic rights a normal citizen should deserve, freedom of choice, worship, and assembly were distressed. Though the idea of philosopher kings is good on paper, fundamental flaws of the human kind even described by Plato himself prevent it from being truly successful. The idea of an ideal democratic government like what our founding fathers had envisioned is the most successful and best political form which will ensure individual freedom and keep power struggle to a minimum.

    Read More

  • Comparing Socrates 'Glaucon And The Cave'

    930 Words  | 2 Pages

    Here, however he pushes the quality of the education Glaucon received and not just what was give to him, but rather what was taught. Socrates also criticizes the value of other states as to him “virtue and wisdom” being the most valuable motivation. Further exemplifying the superiority complex that Socrates is instilling in his students he sneers at other states who busy themselves not on bettering themselves, but rather in dominating others. Whether that be through war or politics. Establishing that their state is better than others magnifies the fact that Socrates referred to him as a leader of such a virtuous and wise

    Read More

  • The Man Who Was Socrates

    1438 Words  | 3 Pages

    To begin with, Socrates is obviously a proud man, and when he declares that he will never give way to anyone for the sake of h...

    Read More

  • Socrates And Thororeeau And Civil Disobedience By Henry David Thoreau

    714 Words  | 2 Pages

    In view of the fact that, he thought of the government as very bad people who basically did wicked and bad things to people. (Example, the American slavery and the Mexican and American war.) And that all in all they didn’t need a government like that. Because they took things that they shouldn’t as if they didn’t have too much power already. He stated to only abide by the laws that he made for himself and not by the government. He felt like they were more harmful to others than helpful then what other peoples perspective of them was. While Socrates thought of the government as good people he felt like they made the people’s lives better rather than not having a government at all like Thoreau

    Read More

  • Socrates as Philosopher King

    1702 Words  | 4 Pages

    History is ripe with stories of great men.  Hundreds of politicians, philosophers, performers, and writers have left a unique stamp on humanity.  But only a select few can be said to have "changed history."  The legendary Athenian, Socrates, was one such figure.  Socrates ushered in an era of philosophical inquiry that still lingers to this day.  In Book Seven of Plato's The Republic, Socrates outlines his perfect regime.  According to Socrates, an enlightened "Philosopher-King" must rule such a regime.  Now suppose this Republic actually came into being, and Socrates was asked to rule it as a Philosopher King.  Would he?  Answering this begs three important questions:  Is Socrates a true philosopher?  Does he have the appropriate virtues?  Finally, and most importantly, if Socrates has the capacity to rule, why is he silent about it?

    Read More

  • The Apology and the Republic

    925 Words  | 2 Pages

    ...litical figure came close to challenging Socrates' unique philosophical plan. In the Republic, Socrates' ideas of how ignorant a democracy is, is portrayed in the Apology when Socrates' proclamation resulted in death. A democracy is supposed to be about individuality and freedom, however it was contradicted when Socrates was put to death because he had ideas for a better system of ruling. He wanted a ruler to be somebody who would see truth, not shunning certain ideas and keeping others solely because it is not understood. These ideas are portrayed in both excerpts.

    Read More

  • Plato And Socrates Essay

    1197 Words  | 3 Pages

    Socrates and Plato were some of the world’s most famous philosophers. Yet, they caused much trouble in the midst of their philosophizing. These philosophers, in the view of the political elites, were threatening the Athenian democracy with their philosophy. But why did they go against the status quo? What was their point in causing all of this turmoil? Plato and Socrates threatened the democracy as a wake-up call. They wanted the citizens to be active thinkers and improve society. This manifested itself in three main ways: Socrates’ life, his student Plato’s life, and their legacy in our modern age.

    Read More

  • Socrates: The Most Integral

    757 Words  | 2 Pages

    Nails, Debra, N. (2005, September 16). Socrates. Stanford University. Retrieved November 11, 2013, from http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/socrates/

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast Locke And Socrates

    1169 Words  | 3 Pages

    Socrates believes the opinions of the wise should be taken in to account while the options of the many be disregarded. He says, “Then, my friend, we must not regard what the many say of us: but what he, the one man who has understanding of just and unjust, will say.” What Socrates’s is say is the general public has limited knowledge and doesn’t have the ability to determine what is just and unjust, therefore their opinions should be disregarded. The reason I disagree with this because it implies that knowledgeable men are pure. But we know this is not the true nature of man. Man is greedy and power hungry. Kings and Queens of England are very well educated people but they were far from determining what was just. Socrates’s theory seems to me like another form of dictatorship where the very few control the many. Locke’s theory on the other hand, seems more practical. Locke says, “When any number of men have so consented to make one community or government, they are thereby presently incorporated, and make one body politic, wherein the majority have a right to act and conclude the rest.” In simple terms Locke says that the majority controls what happens in society. The major flaw in this theory is that there is nothing to protect the minority, but Locke is heading in the right direction because we see it today. Most of our elections today are determined by the

    Read More

More about Glaucon Vs Socrates

Open Document