Gerrymandering: Two Successful Practices

208 Words1 Page
bulb-icon

Recommended: Gerrymandering process

In election times gerrymandering is a common occurrence. Gerrymandering is the process of giving one political party the advantage over another political party. Gerrymandering has two successful practices, which is packing a district and cracking a district. The process of packing a district is that where the lines of districts are expanded to pack the opposing party voters into fewer districts. The process of cracking a district is where district lines are broken up so the opposition party gains fewer district votes. Both of these are consider the most effective practices in the process of gerrymandering. I would most likely engage in gerrymandering to ensure control for my party. As it a legal concept I would be willing to engage in the

Show More
Related

  • The Pros And Cons Of Political Party Power

    1392 Words  | 3 Pages

    By doing this neither side can have a more liberal nor more conservative view but a view that meets in the middle or are moderate like discussed in class with the diagram. The leaders of the party’s have to develop programs or laws that will lure more constituents to vote for their party and eventually support it. Achieving this task can help in undermining and stealing the opponents support base. Hispanic voters will be a very crucial base in the future and having their votes is very important in future elections for both parties. Both parties have to entice this group to vote for them and this would mainly be a important task for Republicans since they are very conservative and have a view on immigration that doesn’t favor Latino voters. So in the up coming years I believe that they have to change their views to try and get the support of this group or else it can prove to be very detrimental to them. Overall, I believe that competition between both groups and having to adjust to a growing Latino and minority base motivates the parties to try and create laws and programs to satisfy these groups. Therefore, I believe that political parties power are just right because they get their power from the people and by trying to expand their base of constituents is of most

    Read More

  • Report on Winner-Take-All

    695 Words  | 2 Pages

    "Winner-take-all” is a term used to describe single member district and at large election systems that award seats to the highest vote getters without ensuring fair representation for minority groups. In the United States, these are typically single-member district schemes or at-large, block-voting systems. Under winner-take-all rules, a slim majority of voters can control 100% of seats, leaving everyone else effectively without representation.

    Read More

  • Unfairness in the Electoral College

    798 Words  | 2 Pages

    Even though there was a difference of a quarter million popular votes, the same number of votes were provided. Thus, this system discriminates against people who live in states with high turnout. Rather than having statewide electoral vote distribution, vote distribution in congressional districts could be a little more effective in representing people’s will. Upon this defectiveness of electoral system, current system is failure the way it mislead results and misrepresent population.

    Read More

  • Essay On Partisan Elections

    633 Words  | 2 Pages

    In this essay, I will explain why Texas should retain the partisan election of judges. Texas is one of the few states that elect their judges using a Partisan voting method. Partisan elections can be unfair and can misinform the voter. A high legal position such as a judge should never be chosen in such a manner. Partisan elections often cost more than nonpartisan elections in campaigning. Partisan elections are also more likely to lead to straight ticket voting or mindless voting. Partisan elections also lead to more campaign contributions and can increase the power of constituencies. Lastly partisan elections can cause an imbalance in equal represent the population. Therefore, Partisanship voting does not belong in the courts of Texas and

    Read More

  • The Pros and Cons of Proportional Representation (PR)

    1160 Words  | 3 Pages

    The results of recent elections in Britain raised many significant questions about current political situation in the country, particularly concerning electoral system. Therefore the problem of “crisis” in democracy of Britain was the subject of wide speculation among analysts and political scientists over last years. In addition it is widely recognized that the traditional electoral system in the UK-first past the post- is the main cause of that crisis and should be replaced as part of a plan to reconstitute the democratic culture (Kelly 2008). By longstanding critics of the system, opponents advocate the use of proportional representation (PR) for selecting MPs. Due to this problem it is going to be a referendum on changing the electoral system of the country's parliamentary elections. Arguments in favor of the adoption of proportional representation in UK have been made much more widely in recent years than in the case in favor of maintaining the current system of the majority vote. In this essay I would like to help restore the balance pointing out some misapprehensions in the critique of the plurality vote and to indicate some disregarded advantages of the present electoral system in Britain.

    Read More

  • Canada Needs Proportional Representation

    1686 Words  | 4 Pages

    One may be surprised to learn that the turnout rate of individuals voting in Canada's federal elections has never reached 80% (Elections Canada). In fact, it has been decreasing since the middle of the twentieth century, as shown by an increase in voter apathy. An electoral system is designed to provide those who live in democratic governments with the opportunity to vote – in an election – for the candidate whose platform coincides with their political beliefs. This can be achieved through a direct democracy, where citizens are directly involved in the decision-making process, or through an indirect democracy, where citizens elect a delegate to act on their behalf. In a direct democracy, all citizens would be present during governmental meetings and have the opportunity to give verbal input. As one may expect, this would be extremely difficult to coordinate with Canada's population of 34.88 billion (Statistics Canada). Canada uses an indirect democracy, which allows for two basic forms of electoral systems in which representatives are elected. In the simple plurality electoral system, the candidate who receives the greatest number of votes is elected, regardless of a majority or not. It is commonly known as the “first-past-the-post” system, which alludes to a horse race; the winner passes the post with the highest number of votes, and only need to garner more votes than their opponents. The successful candidate wins all the seats in their riding or constituency while the candidates who places second or third will receive no seats, regardless of how many votes they lose by. Proportional representation is the second form of electoral system used in Canada; the percentage of the votes received by a party is proportionate to the numb...

    Read More

  • The Detrimental Practice of Gerrymandering

    988 Words  | 2 Pages

    In American politics today, many practices exist that greatly harm the American public. One of these dangerous practices, known as gerrymandering, occurs in nearly every state. While some claim that the practice helps America, in reality gerrymandering harms American democracy and safety. Gerrymandering greatly affects society, and must become illegal to insure fair representation, the democratic processes in America continues, and America continues to thrive.

    Read More

  • Single-Member Districts

    764 Words  | 2 Pages

    The single-member district election system is the most common and best-known electoral system currently in use in America. It is used to elect the U.S. House Representatives, as well as many state and local legislatures. Under single member district systems, an area is divided into a number of geographically defined voting districts, each represented by a single elected official. Voters can only vote for their district’s representative, with the individual receiving the most votes winning election. This method of electing representatives is better than any alternative solution in various ways. Four compelling reasons to support the single-member district election system include the fact that single-member districts give each voter a single, easily identifiable district member; the way single-member district voting helps protect against overreaching party influence; that single-member districts ensure geographic representation; and finally, that single-member districts are the best way to maximize representatives’ accountability.

    Read More

  • Reapportionment Essay

    1052 Words  | 3 Pages

    In some states, including Wisconsin, redistricting is regarded as a law that the legislation passes, which fulfill the national and state principle of redistricting, and the governor will decide to sign or veto the bill. If a person coming from an underrepresented district brings suit to the court, the court will be the one who do the redistricting, but the redistricting made by the court can result in putting two officials in the same district. The third way for reapportionment is to establish a special commission. Depending on the states, the special commission can be appointed by the governor or the legislature or is chosen from a panel of candidates or is elected in a nonpartisan ballot. The reason behind this process is to reduce the partisanship in redistricting to ensure some level of

    Read More

  • The Unfairness of the Electoral College

    773 Words  | 2 Pages

    Established in Article II of the Constitution, the Electoral College was created as a compromise between those who wanted the people to elect the President and those who wanted Congress to elect the President. This system calls for the people to vote for electors who would then in turn vote to determine who gets the presidency. These electors would be chosen by each state party committee, and they would equal the number of Senators and Representatives each state has (Document 2). In the late 1700s, Alexander Hamilton, a man involved in the creation of the Constitution and the Federalist Papers, argued that this would be a good idea and was in favor of it because he believed it was better for educated citizens to vote for the most powerful man in the country as opposed to the common man (Document 1). Despite his reasoning, the Electoral College has a big problem. The Electoral College is actually not fair and equitable to elect the President because it does not accurately represent the people, does not follow the will of the people, and only supports the two major political parties.

    Read More

  • Political Science Final Exam

    758 Words  | 2 Pages

    ...d I believe that proportional representation would be the most effective system to further the goals of democracy. If we use the single member plurality system we automatically ignore and exclude the voice of the people who didn’t win the election in a first past the post method. On the other hand in the proportional system rather than all seats being given to the party with the most votes every party gets the seats equal to the amount of votes they were able to obtain. This would allow all the people who voted to have their ‘”voice” represented in the government even though the party they voted for did not end up winning the election. This would encourage and engage many citizens to become involved in the political process; who otherwise would be discourage to vote at the fact that even if they vote, if their party loses their vote would be useless.

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of Ohio's Voting System

    1236 Words  | 3 Pages

    When America was first established, they had the highest voting turnouts ever in American history. Ever since, America’s voting turn-out has dropped (Fortin). The reason for the high turn outs were because American colonists wanted change from the British’s electoral system. As history writes, American colonist rebel and over time becomes one of the greatest countries ever. Today, Americans are one of the worst countries in vote to registration as they rank 120 in the world (Pintor). Over the summer, I got to learn more about Ohio’s electoral system and voting turn outs in a first hand experience. A decreasing number of voting to registration is not only a national problem, but a local issue as well and there are creative ideas in fixing these

    Read More

  • Structure of American and California Governments

    9636 Words  | 20 Pages

    The legislative branch of America helps create the laws or legislation. Ideally, it works to create a society that is safe for all members. The State of California like the federal government has a bicameral legislature, in other words, composed of two chambers. The upper chamber is called the senate, while the lower is called the assembly. A unique process for the state level is that it allows for the initiative. This process circumvents the state congress and can create laws without their aide. In the state of California, every ten years, following a US census, which collects demographic information, state legislators draw redistricting plans for itself, California seats in the US House of Representatives, and the State Board of Equalization. There have been attempts to create a “non-partisan” redistricting commission, but this has been turned down by voters numerous times. Proposition 14, 39, 118, and 119 were all turned down by voters to create a non-partisan districting commission. Every decade a large portion of the state congress’s energy is spent on redistricting. In fact, two of the last four censuses, Supreme Court has had to step in to break a deadlock. In 1970, Ronald Reagan, a Republican, vetoed all together the Democratic redistricting plan. The Supreme Court had to step in and created its own plans for California to follow. Then in 1981, Democrats proposed redistricting as well as congressional delegation redistricting. The Republicans stopped this by adding referendums to the state ballot. Because it was too close to elections though, Supreme Court overturned these referendums in 1982. In 1984, they officially passed the new redistricting plan which was very similar to the original plans.

    Read More

  • Electoral Reform

    1122 Words  | 3 Pages

    out on top with 14 points in total out of a maximum of 20 where each

    Read More

  • Voting In America

    380 Words  | 1 Pages

    number of eligible voters would increase along with a spike in our percentages. Several other countries

    Read More

More about Gerrymandering: Two Successful Practices

Open Document