More handpicked essays just for you.
The most dangerous game by richard connell literary devices
An essay on the most dangerous game
Criticism of the most dangerous game
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Character Sketch: General Zaroff General Zaroff from the short story The Most Dangerous Game by Richard Connell proves to be a determine, analytical and immoral character. Zaroff is "singularly handsome man" (Connell, 4). "He [is] tall and middle age, for his hair [is] a vivid white; but his thick eyebrows and pointes military moustache [are] black as night," (4). He is Cossack who`s singular passion is hunting. He has "hunted every kind of game in every land," (5). In this story, he is seen as the antagonist as he decides to hunt Sanger Rainsford the antagonist of the story, although he is a very difficult prey who is difficult to catch. In the text he had proved to be a very determined man especially when it comes to the hunt. His single-mindedness is clearly visible through the ways he assures his capability to hunt animals. Although they do not originate from there, he "stocks the island," (5). In addition, after his hunt with …show more content…
An example of this would be that he hunts humans for the simple reason that hunting animals had b become boring for him. Plus, he does not see this as wrong in the least bit as he says "I'm a hunter, not a murderer," (7). Furthermore, in his hunting game of human against human, he tells Sanger Rainsford "I'll cheerfully acknowledge myself defeat id I do not find you by midnight on the third day," (9). However, he is quick to go back on his word when Rainsford does win and he chooses to challenge him on a battle to the death instead of peacefully releasing him (13). In conclusion, the General is a man with a cold heart and a lack of good the good values that make us human. In the end, General Zaroff lost his battle against Rainsford, even though he was set on winning his dangerous game. This short story is a very good read and kept me interest form the first page to the last. I highly recommend this story to anybody who loves suspenseful
In the short story “The Most Dangerous Game” Rainsford was justified in killing General Zaroff. Rainsford is a hunter. He was on a yacht that crashed and he was the only survivor. The island that he swam to was named “Ship Trap Island.” This where General Zaroff lived. He is also a hunter. He has hunted anything you can think of. Even… people. He has the survivors from the ship wrecks “play” his “game.” The survivors go out into the jungle and General Zaroff goes out and finds them. They have three days to survive. If they don’t get caught in those three days, they win. If they lose… they are killed. This happened to Rainsford. Rainsford, thankfully, won the “game.” He shot General Zaroff after his win.
In “The Most Dangerous Game” by Richard Connell, General Zaroff is shown as crazy, Fearless, and Playful. General Zaroff is shown to be crazy in the story when he traps people on his island and then hunt them. “No animal had a chance with me anymore”(. This quote shows that Rainsford is crazy because during this part, he is hunting real living humans. During the story, General Zaroff is also Fearless. He shows that he is when he is hunting Rainsford and he knows he is in the tree but doesn't kill him because he wants a better fight. “His eyes stopped before they got to the limb where Rainsford laid and he smiled”. General Zaroff shows that he is fearless during this scene because he could get killed if he lets him live for a better fight but
In the Lilies of the Field by William E. Barrett, Homer and Mother Maria both display straightforward, hardworking, and stubborn character traits. Firstly, Homer and Mother Maria both display a straightforward personality by being brutally honest about their opinions. For example, when Mother Maria asks Homer to build a chapel, Homer speaks his mind by telling her he does not want to build it. Mother Maria shows her straightforward behavior during Homer’s stay at the convent. One morning, when Homer sleeps in late, Mother to becomes extremely upset and is not afraid to show how she feels about him. Secondly, both Homer and Mother Maria display a hardworking spirit. Homer is a hardworking man because after finally agreeing to build the chapel,
In the short story “the most dangerous game”, Rainsford was justified in killing General Zaroff.
In “The Most Dangerous Game” by Richard Connell, Gen. Zaroff is shown as insane, intelligent and competitive. Zaroff is shown to be insane in the story when he explains who he hunts. “So I said: ‘What are the attributes of an ideal quarry?’ and the answer was of course ‘It must have courage, cunning, and be able to reason… My dear fellow, there is one that can… Why should I not be serious, I am speaking of hunting” (Connell 69-70). This quote shows that Gen. Zaroff demented is because during this part, he is hunting humans for fun. During the
In both film and story, Rainsford expresses his lack of sympathy for his prey. Similar to the story, Rainsford meets Ivan first and can’t get through to him and then, he’s greeted by Zaroff. In the film, Zaroff knows that Rainsford is a famous hunter and has read his books, just like in the story. Moreover, Zaroff reveals that a cape buffalo gave him the scar on his head. In the same manner, Zaroff tells Rainsford how he stocks his island with human prey. Just as the film showed Zaroff has a room filled with human heads, and that’s also mentioned in the story. Furthermore, Rainsford uses the same traps (Malay Mancatcher, Burmese Tiger Pit, and a native Uganda Trick) in the film as he did in the story. In addition, Rainsford kills Ivan with the same native Uganda trick. Both film and movie, unveils that Rainsford kills
Zaroff is extremely pleased when he gets to host Rainsford at his house, as if it's an honor to host this world renowned hunter in his home. He is so pleased when he has the chance to tell Rainsford about his new hunting style. “Dear me. Again with that unpleasant word. But I think I can show you that your scruples are quite ill founded” (26). Zaroff believes that he can change Rainsfords view on his hunting style when he reacts immediatly with great disgust.
Rainsford headed off and had spent two hours making his way across a bush all the while repeating the phrase, “I must keep my nerve” (Connell 11). Rainsford tried to keep calm in a terrifying situation because he wanted to live. He was being motivated by the idea of living so he kept persevering. Rainsford had jumped into the sea to get away from the General and it had worked because later that night Rainsford snuck into the General's room and challenged him. Rainsford ultimately won the game and won the privilege of sleeping Zaroff's excellent bed, because we can infer that Rainsford killed him (Connell 15). Rainsford took a chance and jumped into the sea because he knew he wasn’t going to give up without a fight. When Rainsford showed up in his room he knew the general would not let him leave so he challenged him in order for him to stay alive, again taking a chance in order to live. Throughout the story Rainsford had changed, leading up to this moment when he won the game, stayed alive, and killed the general. In the beginning Rainsford was motivated by the great sport of hunting, but then near the end Rainford's only motivation was to stay
In “ The Most Dangerous Game,” Connell portrays several instances in the text indicating that Zaroff is indeed evil. Close to the beginning of the story Connell writes, "I want to show you my new collection of heads. Will you come with me to the library?"” (76). In this quote Zaroff is boasting about his collection of human Heads, this instance in the story shows that Zaroff collecting ...
General Zaroff is described by Connell from Rainsford’s point-of-view, “Rainsford 's first impression was that the man was singularly handsome; his second was that there was an original, almost bizarre quality about the general 's face. He was a tall man past middle age, for his hair was a vivid white; but his thick eyebrows and pointed military mustache were as black as the night from which Rainsford had come. His eyes, too, were black and very bright. He had high cheekbones, a sharpcut nose, a spare, dark face--the face of a man used to giving orders, the face of an aristocrat.” (Paragraph 56). Here Connell really paints a picture in the reader 's imagination of what Zaroff’s appearance is, showing that he is tall, has a very distinctive face, and looks like a man used to giving orders to others. Later on when Rainsford and Zaroff took place in their hunting game, at one point Rainsford was hiding from Rainsford to avoid being killed. When describing what was going on from Rainsford point-of-view again, it was stated that terror was about to burst from his heart, while he was watching Zaroff smoke below the tree he was in. This really lets the reader’s mind know how much fear was going on through Rainsford during this hunting game. Here Connell really shows how his use of imagery relates to the tone of the story and how is set during
In this story, Zaroff can be described as confident and crafty. There are, of course, reasons for each of these. First, General Zaroff is confident. One reason for that is that he believes that he is the best hunter, and cannot be defeated. On page forty-eight he says, “They were no match at all for a hunter with his wits about him.”
General Zaroff is similar to Rainsford because he is also dangerous, but overall, General Zaroff is a lot different because he is evil, and skillful. Zaroff shows this is in the story when he hunted and murdered multiple people from all over the world. In the story it says, “Hunting? Good god, General Zaroff what you speak of is murder.”(Connell 49). This shows that Zaroff is a devious man that loved to kill for sport and personal amusement. However, Zaroff is different from Rainsford because he is the true definition of evil which is shown in the story when he stated that his quarry includes humans. An example of this is shown when he stated “the weak of the world were put here to give the strong pleasure... If I wish to hunt, why should I not?” (Connell 49). To sum it all up Zaroff has an abundance of confidence and self-pride in himself, which was his ultimate downfall. Also to show that Zaroff is very different from Rainsford, Zaroff is evil because of the fact that he has a lust for blood. In the text, this was shown when it says, “He need not to play that game if he doesn’t wish to. If he does not wish to hunt, I turn him over to Ivan” (Connell 51). So regardless of the choices that person will die, this is described as true dread. Even though zaroff and Rainsford may both be skillful, but the fact that zaroff is evil, and dangerous makes him a completely a
Sanger Rainsford has to overcome many obstacles he faces to not become what he fears, the hunted. When he is sprinting away from General Zaroff he has to fight the urge to quit, and he has to fight the battle of “The Most Dangerous Game.” He is running from the hounds, Ivan, and General Zaroff, when he arrives at a safe place he thinks about how close he was to becoming what he fears. Nevertheless, Sanger Rainsford out wits everything he has experienced and wins “The Most Dangerous Game.”
General Zaroff from “The Most Dangerous Game” is a thrill-seeker, a hunter never satisfied with the danger and challenge of the hunt, but also evil, as seen later in the story.
...ference between them is there moral differences, Zaroff is willing to cross the line and kill innocent people and Rainsford will not unless his life and others depends on it. Both Rainsford and Zaroff are very competitive. Sanger Rainsford refuses to give up, and stays calm. Zaroff is overly proud and loves to win, he shows it when he smiles and says “to date I have not lost”. Throughout the story Zaroff constantly has the upperhand, they are playing cat and mouse. Rainsford has the ability to turn the tables and in the end make Zaroff fear for his life.