Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Why college education should not be free
Wealth affecting education
Why college education should not be free
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Why college education should not be free
“Every person in this country who has the desire and ability should be able to get all the education they need regardless of the income of their family. This is not a radical idea” (Better World). The use of biased articles that contain fallacies and rhetorical devices that can distort the viewpoint of the readers, is the main cause of misinformation on many issues happening in the world. On the topic of free tuition, the concern for those opposed to this ideology is “how will it become free” or that there are no benefits of making college free. Those who are for the notion of a free higher education, explain how it will not only benefit students, but families and the economy as well. The issue of free tuition is not a concept of who’s wrong …show more content…
For a majority of our nation’s history, public colleges and universities have been much more affordable than they are today, with lower tuition and financial aid that covered a much larger portion of the costs. “Bernie sanders says wall street tax will pay for his free tuition plan” is an article, written by Lauren Carroll, that gives a neutral viewpoint on the topic of Sanders’ free tuition plan. In this editorial, the author discusses how this plan will be payed for and how the rich will be taxed in order to provide services to the non-wealthy. “Why Free College Tuition is a Bad Idea” written by Lonnie Webster Says, along with many other authors, is a heavily biased article that goes against the idea of free college tuition because of the many negative effects it could have on our economy. While articles like “Bernie sanders is right…” and ”Why free college tuition is a bad idea” are both heavily biased article, filled with fallacies and rhetorical devices in order to convince the reader, “Bernie Sanders says Wall Street…” remains neutral on the topic because it argues both sides and simply gives factual …show more content…
One example of a fallacy that the author uses is a straw man, which is when the author makes the opposing side look worse than it actually is. This is seen when the author makes a statement about Hillary Clinton, “Sadly Hillary Clinton decries bold efforts to make college affordable because she thinks Gov. Scott Walker won’t like it, or one of Trump’s kids might actually benefit. Should the Democrats really support a leader with a defeatist attitude about a critical 21st century problem?” (Bernie Sanders) By claiming that Clinton will not support Sanders’ free tuition plan, the reader now believes that the opposing side is automatically
Ellison, Keith. “The Argument for Tuition-Free College.” The American Prospect. The American Prospect. 14 April 2016.Web. 20 March 2018.
One of the hot topics of debate going on in the U.S. today that presidential candidates are talking about is college tuition. Some have revealed their proposals to American citizens on how they would tackle the issue of tuition. The question is which one of the many proposals will work and limit the amount of people who don’t go to college and give them a reason to go. The tuition issue is not a case by case problem, but a national problem. While there are some who have the opportunity to attend college others are not as fortunate. But everyone can have a part in shaping the future for many generations to come. The objective is to find a way to make what some would call “college free”to everyone. How were we able to find a way to make public
The idea of freedom and equal opportunity that America was built on has sadly been lost and replaced with a system of quality education only being accessible by the wealthy. In-state college tuition should be free for all students meeting admission requirements, allowing students from the full spectrum of economic backgrounds to have the same opportunity to receive the same education. The incidence of poverty in the U.S. is directly linked to educational level. When a college degree is earned, income levels rise (College Board). The best use of federal government anti-poverty funds is not another welfare or assistance program; it is to make college education affordable for everyone.
Many Americans are seeking an ideal presidential candidate for our next election; furthermore, many college students seek a candidate that has their best interest in mind, leading many to focus on Bernie Sanders and his ideas for an affordable education system. In the article, The Myth of the Student Loan Crisis, Nicole Allan and Derek Thomas focus the article on the risky investments of college and questioning the rising debt levels as a national crisis. While Allan and Davis claim the risk of college and mention rising debt levels as a national crisis; however, Allan and Davis use charts to support their stance while avoiding the issues Americans need to focus on, such as the rising cost of college, “justifiable debt”, and the cost of those not contributing to society.
According to Trade Schools, Colleges and Universities “Many of America's top-performing high school students never apply to the most challenging colleges and universities even though they have the ability to succeed at them. They often come from minority and low-income households and end up pursuing more affordable, less-selective schools instead.” College can be a burden to many students in a variety of different ways, but the most common reason is due to funds. Making college free for students will help this problem by increasing jobs in the work industry that require degrees, they should be affordable to all people at all cost, as well as the funds should be completely cut off because it would increase jobs and help America's economy grow.
Over the past years of getting a college degree was the pathway to get a settle career. College has been a reason for people to carry on after high school. Now that tuition has been raised, getting a degree seems to drain students with more loans and could be in debt. College has been raised to the point where people rather start working at a minimum wage than continuing with school. Working on a part time job would be an easier choice rather than pursuing towards their degree. As people attend college, fees build up and students loaning money and possibly be in debt. Not only that, some may say college isn’t worth it, but it is. Getting a degree pays off at the end going towards your career path, making twice as much as you would work at a regular job. Students who have received a degree are slowly declining. To make adjustment, College should be free for
Imagine you worked your whole life to get into a good college but the only thing things stopping you was that you’re homeless. The number of homeless is growing number, there is a way to help. Students with temporary living situations and a 3.0 GPA should earn free college tuition. Children with temporary living situations should be able to earn free college tuition because they work hard for their GPA, education is very important, and because the parents are not financially stable.
As Bernie Sanders, a presidential candidate for the 2016 presidential elections, claims he can make college free, the subject of tuition for secondary schooling has become a “hot” topic. The New York Times, on January 20th, released a “Room for Debate” titled “Should College be Free?” where many journalists such as Andrew P. Kelly and Sara Goldrick-Rab voiced their opinions on college tuition. “Just one-third of students from the bottom income quartile, who started at a community college in 2003 finished with a degree or certificate by 2009,” wrote Kelly, showing that the poorer find it hard to finish college with a degree. He believed that indigent students would likely not graduate with a degree due to college cost and because they are not motivated enough to get through six years of college. Although it is unpractical to create an educational system where college is absolutely free, creating organizations dedicated to encouraging the needy to get through
Calling a college education “free” is a contradiction because nothing in life is truly free. Someone will be responsible for paying for this education, even if it is not the person receiving it. To support this flood of hopeful college students, the American Government will have to heavily tax the working and upper classes. Taxes will have to be inflated to compensate for the price of college, and in some cases, may become outrageously high. If the upper class becomes constantly taxed, what keeps them from dropping down a class? What keeps the middle class from becoming the lower class? In an extreme situation, if the middle and upper classes were constantly taxed, there risks a problem of creating a bigger class divide. Maybe the plan to pay for college education starts out with only the rich being taxed. In America, there are roughly 324 million people. This number increases every eight seconds, so there is a constant increase of citizens. Imagine if half of that number decides to go to college. College education is free for them, but their tuition is paid for by the upper class. Now, average college tuition runs for about $9,410 for State Universities, and around $32,405 for out of state students. This amount of money, per student, is paid for by the upper class’s taxes. Taxes are raised higher and higher to pay for all these students until they cannot be raised any further. The upper
Following the topic of economy, an article defending the one percent of America that has a high income states that Professor Edward McCaffery argued for the United States to repeal its federal income and estate taxes. These taxes play a bigger role on people who usually have a high income. Discussing about free college tuition an article states, “Tuition fee policies and the financial assistance policies that accompany them are critical both for the very considerable revenue at stake and for the potential impact on higher education accessibility and the implications for equity and social justice”. This scholar argues that college tuition benefits colleges to keep them open and is beneficially to the features of college. An article that is against higher minimum wage argues that the goal of minimum wage is not to reduce employment but to redistribute earnings to low paid workers and that enacting a minimum wage is risky but potentially profitable. Nevertheless due to the low pay, employers and companies are able to make a bigger profit than having workers on a regular
For most young Americans, college has always been preached to them as being a vital part to their success in the adult world; but as they reach this educative rite of passage many find they must take out inflated loans, work part time jobs, or even become dissuaded entirely due to the exorbitant costs of higher education. We must forsake this current antiquated system in favor of government subsidized tuition. Therefore, college education must be free because of its benefit to the economy, creation of equal opportunity, and the resolution of the student loan crisis.
He gives many reasons against the tuition-free college proposal. The proposal requires higher expenditure for government and it is not guaranteed that it will improve the educational system and be beneficial for students at community college. Furthermore, community colleges should figure out the solution to solve the growing dropout rates problem instead of trying to add more students to fill their classrooms. For working-class students, the Pell Grant program of federal government already provides two years of free community college for them, and it might also benefit middle-class students. He concludes that the most important thing is figuring out how to use tax money sensibly to help students attend post-secondary school. This article provides current and valuable information for anyone who is concerned with free tuition college
INTRODUCTION Many people believe that education is one of the determinant factors to predict the future day, whether will be succeed or not. In several countries, Government usually guided their citizen, especially for the students, to continue their education to the collage. Finland, Sweden, Germany, and the Middle East are the example of countries where the Government is willing to give free tuition fee for the students until highest level of education (Daeng, 2017). These countries proven that having a high educational level would impact to the welfare of the country. With the good collaboration between the government and the citizen, they can finally work together and each of them is making a symbiotic mutualism.
This has sparked the debate as to whether higher education ought to be offered free of charge or not, with many rallying for the former. In order to level the playground for all Americans and offer equal opportunities in life; higher education should be offered free of charge to all. This paper seeks to make a convincing argument regarding the importance and need of having free higher education. At the same time, this essay seeks to cite some of the opinions of those of a contrary opinion, giving them a different viewpoint. In the end, this essay will weigh the benefits of free higher education against the drawbacks and probably, convince everyone that the benefits are enough to guarantee free higher education.
Independent.Leadership.Equality. All of these are three characteristics as to what free university education can provide to citizens.Higher education should be free of charge for the citizens of the United States.In the US the average cost for colleges per year is $8,893. Many middle class and under class people cannot afford such costs. It is true that the government will give you grants but most of the time students never get funding from them (Emmons 3). Most people of today can hardly afford a car let alone the fees and tuition of college. Also, it could provide equality to all people. Allowing everyone an equal opportunity to go to college and make something of themselves. It provides a way for poorer families to break free from their social strata that they have been put into (“This House Believes University Education Should Be Free” 4). This is why it is important to make university education free.In the end citizens of the US would benefit from university free education.