Following the Ark of Beauty

1448 Words3 Pages

Two forlorn leaves cling to the highest branch of a great oak as winter approaches. Nearly all of the others have fallen, and the second leaf wonders if “we know anything about ourselves when we're down there” (Salten 105). Both know that their time on the branch grows short. The first comforts its friend with recollections of warm summer breezes and the promise that many leaves will come after them, and then, still more. The first leaf is troubled itself now, and gently tells her friend to say no more for a while. After several hours of silence, a cold wind gusts, and the second leaf is torn from the branch, just as she began to speak, leaving the first alone in the cold and dark, with no one to comfort or be comforted by (Salten 105-110). This brief chapter in Salten’s novel Bambi foreshadows the many deaths to come and amplifies their meaning, while Disney’s animators realized they couldn’t render the haunting sub-story effectively and wisely hewed close to the broader strokes of the overall plot, which can be delivered successfully through both mediums. It’s not enough to tell a coherent story full of finely nuanced truths. The story has to travel through an effective medium, or no one will care, and if no one cares, no one will understand. The best mediums deliver structures of truth with maximum visceral impact, so that we not only grasp the revealed truth but fully internalize it. Subject to every whim of wind and weather, fragile leaves face their first and final fall after a single summer. Faceless, utterly inanimate and incapable of any sort of outward action yet clearly alive, the leaves themselves are a medium that embodies helplessness, aloneness, and individual insignificance. It’s also why their magic works on a p... ... middle of paper ... ...nched this October, but research in general and neuroscience in particular remains underfunded. Ed Catmull completed his graduate work in the twilight of grand research projects in the US. Since the mid-70s our scientists must spend much of their time worrying about their next grant and have little creative license, as projects tend to be short term, highly specific and don’t actually provide the human scientist with much to live on. The ARPA projects that began in 1958 aren’t just why we have Pixar, but also created both the first modern computer and ARPAnet, grandfather to the Internet. We do still have ARPA, now known as DARPA (Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency), but we are no longer creating a safe place for fragile creativity to take form. If we invested in putting smart people together again, they might create nothing less than a more interesting mind.

Open Document