Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Conservatives political ideology
Conservatives political ideology
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Conservatives political ideology
The past few years have seen an unprecedented wave of far-right conservatism sweep through Washington, and in turn, the country. This is a wave that borders on extremism and it is a wave that cannot and must not be underestimated in respect to its potential to do harm to many of the country’s citizens and residents. Though this dangerous brand of far-right conservatism does not have its roots in Donald Trump, he has allowed and encouraged its supporters’ actions. One of the most noticeable changes within the country since Trump’s inauguration in January of 2017 has been the dramatic increase in anti-semitic hate crimes. Since January, over 50 JCCs (Jewish community centers) have received bomb threats, and at least three Jewish cemeteries were vandalized. Though Trump is not solely to …show more content…
His populist rhetoric appealed to a diverse group of mostly whites, from working class whites of low socioeconomic status, many of whom had lost their jobs, to well-off suburbanites with college degrees. However, it grew increasingly clear over the course of his campaign and the beginning of his presidency that Trump was by no means a “typical” Republican. Reporter Peggy Noonan wrote in The Patriot Post that “[Trump] was creating ‘a worker’s party’ a ‘party of people who haven’t had a wage increase in 18 years” (Trump tries to build a ‘Different Party’). To create this party, Trump united a group of people who came from diverse backgrounds by giving them common enemies. Anyone and everyone who so much as doubted Trump were promptly publicly shamed via Trump’s incessant twitter rants. For instance, a federal judge who overruled Trump’s travel ban was immediately dismissed as a ‘so-called judge’ by Trump in a tweet. As reporter David Brooks wrote in reference to Trump’s administration, “The aroma of bigotry infuses the whole operation” (The Republican
James Oakes’ The Radical and the Republican narrated the relationship between two of America’s greatest leaders: Frederick Douglass, the “radical” abolitionist, and Abraham Lincoln, the “Republican” politician. He did an astonishing job of demonstrating the commonalities between the views of Douglass and Lincoln, but also their differences on their stance of anti-slavery politics and abolitionism. Despite being on the same side of the argument of slavery, Douglass and Lincoln went about their opinions separately. Lincoln held a more patient and orthodox stance on anti-slavery, while Douglass was proven to be obstinate and direct with
Because it is a Constitutional right, the concept of freedom of speech is hardly ever questioned. “On its most basic level [freedom of speech] means you can express an opinion without fear of censorship by the government, even if that opinion is an unpopular one” (Landmark Cases). However, the actions of Americans that are included under “free speech,” are often questioned. Many people support the theory of “free speech,” but may oppose particular practices of free speech that personally offend them. This hypocrisy is illustrated by the case of Neo-Nazis whose right to march in Skokie, Illinois in 1979 was protested by many, but ultimately successfully defended by the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU). The residents of this predominantly Jewish town which contained many Holocaust survivors were offended by the presence of the Neo-Nazis. However, then ACLU Executive Director Aryeh Neier, who...
Anti-Semitism has been a plague on humanity since biblical times. According to Merriam Webster Online Dictionary, anti-Semitism is defined as “hostility toward or discrimination against Jews as a religious, ethnic, or racial group.” This is one of the major themes of Philip Roth’s fictional novel The Plot Against America. In his novel, Roth creates an alternate universe where Charles A. Lindbergh, Nazi sympathizer and friend of Hitler, was picked as the republican candidate and ends up winning the presidency over the democratic candidate, Franklin D. Roosevelt. Throughout the novel, Roth shows how this theoretical change in history could have affected both the outcome of the war and the future for Jews in America, all through the eyes of a young Philip Roth and his family.
The NBA’s all time total point scorer turned out to be an advanced columnist. Kareem Abdul-Jabbar's argument on political hate crimes is rich in evidence and support. In this article Kareem explains his side that politicians under the guise of patriotism publically commit hate crimes. Kareem explains the definition of a hate crime in being “the violence of intolerance and bigotry, intended to hurt and intimidate someone because of their race, ethnicity, national origin, religious, sexual orientation, or disability.” He then uses a prime example, current republican candidate Donald Trump. Throughout Trumps current run for presidency he has been getting known for his hate speech towards women and many different ethnicities.
Hate crimes demand a priority response because of their special emotional and psychological impact on the victim and the victims’ community. The damage done by hate crimes cannot be measured solely in terms of physical injury or dollars and cents. Hate crimes may effectively intimidate other members of the vi...
During the nation’s founding, parties were widely considered to be dangerous to good government and public order, especially in republics. In such an intellectual climate, no self-respecting leader would openly set out to organize a political party. The pervasive fear of parties reflected both historical experience and widely held eighteenth-century beliefs. People in authority saw themselves as agents acting on behalf of the whole community; any organized opposition was therefore misguided at best, treasonous at worst. Accepting the same perspective, rivals justified their opposition by imagining that those in power were betrayers of the community’s trust.
Neoconservatism is a variant of the conservative ideology which holds positions that fall between traditional and individualistic conservatism (Ball and Dagger, 2011b, p. 113). Many of the ideas and beliefs that neoconservatives hold, which continue to evolve today, were developed in the 1970s by “disillusioned liberal intellectuals” as a result of the tumultuous societal conditions that were occurring in the United States at the time (Ball and Dagger, 2011a, p. 170). To elaborate more fully, author Irving Kristol, the man known as the godfather of neoconservatives, says, “Many neoconservatives can be described as disenchanted welfare liberals. Once enthusiastic supporters of President Lyndon Johnson’s ‘Grand Society’ programs in the 1960s, these neoconservatives became disillusioned with these programs and with the general direction of welfare liberalism” (Ball and Dagger, 2011b, p. 113). Besides Irving Kristol, some of the other well known individuals who have helped contribute to the development and direction of neoconservatism over the past few decades include Senator Daniel Patrick Moynihan, Norman Podhoretz, UN Ambassador Jeanne Kirkpatrick, Nathan Glazer, and Dick and Lynne Cheney (Ball and Dagger, 2011b, p. 113). While I personally do not adhere to this ideology, and there are many features I completely disagree with, I will nevertheless stake an affirmative argument for neoconservatism and write as if I am an actual supporter. This is beneficial as it will allow me to empathize with others and put myself in the position of those with whom I disagree. What follows is an argument for a few of the merits of neoconservatism concerning its stance on economic and foreign policy issues.
When Adolf Hitler was put in as Chancellor in 1933, he started to begin the program of the NSDAP, the National Socialist German Labor Party. The highest priorities were to put all men back to work and to increase the birthrate. Both were accomplished by re-instituting the traditional roles of men and women. Within the next 10 years, most women were won over to National Socialism, content to do their part in the great national resurgence.
The question asked “ Based on your understanding of the text and class lectures, do you know enough about American Parties and elections to understand contemporary American politics?” (Take Home Test). To answer this question I would say yes I have learned enough in this class to say that I do understand enough about contemporary American politics in general. I do however believe that American politics is a living thing and that change can happen at any time and no one can learn or know enough about contemporary American politics. I think the most useful things that we learned in class to help with a general understanding is how the system works and the over abundance of problems that the system does have. The basic concepts that
Is Donald Trump a populist? The term “populist” has been repeatedly applied to president Donald Trump. To determine whether President Trump is a populist, we first must look at what exactly populism is. Merriam-Webster dictionary defines populism as a member of a political party that claims to represent the common person (“Populist”). However, the dictionary definition of populism can’t fully define populism. Nearly any perceivable grassroot movement can be seen as populist. Occupy Wall Street is an excellent example of a populist movement. The Occupy movement was us, the 99% versus them, the 1% of Americans who are wealthier.
Trump caused all of this, he is to blame. Reporters of these cases came to conclusions; "It became so clear — at least in many people's minds — that the Trump presidency represented a kind of white nationalism, and we saw people who have white nationalist ideas or tendencies just go crazy," (Jaeger). It is clear that since the number of hate crimes went up directly after the election, that it was caused by Trump winning. Since Trump made the idea of a “white nationalism” (Jaeger), than in return, people against that or for it, will want to expose as much of their opinion as possible. Trump is an unqualified candidate, who encourages the disgraceful behavior of his followers. He caused a lot of commotion within the U.S, and in some cases it
The liberalism of fear is a reply to these undeniable actualities, which in the process focuses on damage control. Our ever growing fear of domination by the state, continues to play a role in why Americans continue to revolt against authority, or even local governments. The practices of torture use to be have been eliminated years ago from the practiced of government institutions. There was big hope for the future that practice of torture tactics would eventually stop everywhere. But, in recent times the public has been able to see declassified documents that involve tourture procedures still prevalent in todays tactics. For example, as of yesterday the Senate Intelligence committee released a 500 page report on the tactics the CIA, have been using to interrogate prisoners after the 9/11 attacks.
Trump's candidacy was marred by racism, xenophobia and misogyny. Moreover, having a president whose vulgar actions and words reflect on us, the people, make the world a little more dangerous for women, Muslims, people of color, and the ones in the LGBTQ community. Despite this, it is too large a generalization and pessimistic view to assume that Mr. Trump's electoral votes were won from a place of hate. His favor among the white middle class was supposedly based on their dissatisfaction with Washington and Mr. Trump’s promise to return outsourced job through immigration and economic
Populism refers to the political philosophy that pits the downtrodden masses against the apathetic ruling elite. La Moral refers to the conformity to the code of conduct set by employers. Modernization is the transformation from a traditional, rural society that primarily relies on agriculture to an urban, industrialized society. The emergence and flourishing of modern society has been inextricably linked with the development of industries, infrastructure and cities. Sociologists and political analysts agree that “urbanization and industrialization were the main causes of populism in Latin America.” (Conniff and Roberts 6)
Modern day society is engrossed in a battle for protection of individual rights and freedoms from infringement by any person, be it the government or fellow citizens. Liberalism offers a solution to this by advocating for the protection of personal freedom. As a concept and ideology in political science, liberalism is a doctrine that defines the motivation and efforts made towards the protection of the aforementioned individual freedom. In the current society, the greatest feature of liberalism is the protection of individual liberty from intrusion or violation by a government. The activities of the government have, therefore, become the core point of focus. In liberalism, advocacy for personal freedom may translate to three ideal situations, based on the role that a government plays in a person’s life. These are no role, a limited role or a relatively large role. The three make up liberalism’s rule of thumb. (Van de Haar 1). Political theorists have