Essay On California Constitution

1038 Words3 Pages

California’s Constitution
The American citizens all abide by the United States constitution; however, every state has their own constitution where details not stated in the United States constitution may be voted upon and applied to their own state. In this paper I will compare some of the details of governmental powers and individual rights in the California constitution with the Unites States constitution and the Arizona constitution.
California’s constitution delegates that its government divides its power into three separate branches: the legislative, the executive, and the judicial. The legislative branch consists of the Senate and the Assembly, both holding the power over California legislature. The constitution calls for 40 members in the Senate and 80 members in the Assembly. The legislative has the power to write laws, but they must propose the bill to the governor beforehand. “Perhaps the greatest change to the constitution was the insertion of direct democracy” (Fiber-Ostrow, 16). Although the legislative holds the power to make laws, citizens have the right to propose initiatives and amendments which created a direct democracy.
The Governor of California holds the power in the executive along with elected executive officers. The Governor is in charge of making sure that all the laws are being executed that have been written by the judicial. Governor is also give the power of being in charge of the California of the state military. The Governor also has the ability to appoint people for positions within the executive branch. The Governor must be an elector that has been a resident of California for at least five years before their election.
California’s judicial branch has the authority to interpret and appl...

... middle of paper ...

...asting the United States constitution’s Bill of Rights. Arizona also includes a more detailed expansion on the rights to property and privacy. In Brennan’s Epiphany: The Necessity of Invoking State Constitutions to Protect Freedom, Clint Bolick mentions, Those who seek greater protection of private property rights and economic liberties may find state constitutions to be more congenial to their aims than the federal Constitution as interpreted by the U.S. Supreme Court” (par. 3). State constitutions offer more protection to their citizens than what the federal constitution can offer.
State constitutions follow what is listed under the United States Constitution, but they add in more detail rules and regulations of what the United States Constitution does not put in. California and Arizona and other states add what applies to their residents to their constitution.

Open Document