Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Books vs movies compare contrast
Ender game book vs film
Books vs movies compare contrast
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Books vs movies compare contrast
Compare/Contrast Book and Movie The game which killed a whole species in an interstellar war. Ender’s game, the novel and movie that made old school books seem like it was published yesterday. The main concept is about a boy named Ender in an advanced world who feel threatened by an alien race. The military sends the boy to school in space so that he will destroy the world threat. The boy does, and vows to repopulate the aliens. The book Ender's game is better than the movie Ender’s game due to more detail within the story allowing a better connection with the characters. Crucial elements in Ender’s game are the Bugger threats which appear in both the book and movie. We see the Bugger threat as the main incentive for a better military. Another One difference is there are no deaths in Ender’s personal fist fights in the movie unlike the book where he did unintentionally kill 2 guys. Ender faced off Stilson, a bully who was jealous as Ender, He in the movie went to a hospital, In the book he dies of his injuries. Ender also faces off Bonzo, a commander who was also jealous of Ender (I wish people were to get jealous of me, all i get is their pity.) and he had a career ending blow to the head, In the book he was kicked somewhere which pretty much ended his life. This difference make people hate the book or the movie. Another interesting difference is Bernard’s role. In the Book we see that Bernard is another bully and he want’s revenge on Ender for making him look like a fool..and breaking his arm, he tries to help Bonzo kill Ender but he and his team was shut away by Bonzo because of his honer. In the movie his arm was never broken, and he never really vowed revenge, he just kinda hated him and soon they became friends, Bernard even managed to become one of Ender’s commanders in the final battle with the Buggers. This makes the movie seem like there are no actual threats to Ender and he is pretty safe. Another difference we should point out is how long it took ender to get respect. In the book it took Ender a 4 year stuggle to gain leadership skills and eventually respect. In the movie it took Ender The book Ender's game is better than the movie Ender’s game due to more detail within the story allowing a better connection with the characters. The book had more detail, more emotion and feeling then the movie. The book went in the eyes of Ender himself where as the movie went in the eyes of the camera. The book showed us what Ender thought, what he felt, the Movie showed us what the camera saw. People like a deeper connection, it makes them feel good and attracts them to what they are reading. Ender’s game is a very interesting book, it shows us that there is always someone in power, it shows us that we can’t always have peace and quiet as we want, we must fight for our freedom under these conditions, and what is done is done and we must move
The Enders Game written by Orson Scott Card provides understanding of the characters and their relationships with others through indirect characterization and diction. Orson Scott Card uses literacy devices and specific word choice to let the reader draw conclusions about the characters and the relationships between Peter and Ender, the symbolism of the bugger mask/bugger-astronaut game, and the foreshadowing of Peter and Valentines death.
Introduction: Ender is one of the main characters in this book, Ender is intelligent on and off the battlefield he is the youngest in the salamander army but he is more skillful than anyone else in the army. The book Ender’s game is written by Dr son Scott Card, This book was the Hugo and Nebula winner.
“Ender’s Game”, by Orson Scott Card, is a military science fiction novel that narrates the story of a boy named Andrew “Ender” Wiggin and his predetermined life to save humanity. Set in the future, humans are at war with an alien insect race dubbed the “buggers.” The buggers have already invaded Earth two times previously and did not succeed because of Mazer Rackham, the general that won the second invasion. Expecting a third invasion of the buggers, the International Fleet (I.F.) has trained child geniuses at very young ages through games that gradually increase in difficulty including the zero gravity battle rooms in preparation for them to become commanders of the Third Invasion.
Ender’s game is a science fiction novel written by Orson Scott card it was published in 1985. This book is in the future when in the story earth has been invaded by an alien race and is almost destroyed by the invasion but wins the battle and to prevent earth from being destroyed if they return they create the International fleet which recruits kids an teaches them to be commanders. The chapter that I am going to analyze is chapter one which is called Third. This chapter shows how Ender is being manipulated since the start and how he has to deal with being different by being a third.
This book is anti-war since it shows how war could advance someone’s life into a huge disaster, how anyone can break down from the stress that others impose on them, just to be able to produce someone who can save humanity, and how someone’s life was controlled by someone else since they were born and can not be able to change and let themselves hold on to their own life, fate, and future. War destroys everything but Ender’s Game shows how war had affected and destroyed Ender’s whole entire
Ender’s Game is both entertaining and thought-provoking; but while the author cleverly questions the ethics of war, education, and humanity, this book’s greatest lessons are about what it means to be a good leader, which ties into the Marine Corps perfectly because that is what we strive to do. Ender Wiggin is the third in a family of child geniuses. He is selected by international military forces to save the world from destruction. Before being chosen Ender wears a unique monitor that allows the heads of the military to see things as he does. Ender's brother Peter and his sister Valentine also wore this monitor, although neither were selected, and Peter will never forgive Ender for this. Peter hates Ender, and even when the monitor is taken out it does nothing to make the hate towards his brother any less
After much internal debate Ender decides to go to battle school and leave home. He knows he won’t see his family until he is at least 12 but most likely he will have to wait until he is 16. When Ender is inside the ship on the way to battle school, the adults start their manipulation game. Graff calls out Ender as the only one who will save mankind, making the other kids hate Ender and become envious. Ender already lost the chance at having a normal childhood when he was born a third, but he was also considered to be the chosen one to save mankind from the very beginning. The manipulation of Ender is shown through the book and the children at the school either take part in his abuse or ignore the adults who cause it. Through this abusive training tactic Ender becomes the skilled fighter and leader the government wants. Ender gets moved through the program fast. He gets to the command school at age 9, a school no one can go to until they are sixteen. The adults tell him he will be doing simulations to practice the attacks on the buggers, but after the last simulation he finds out he killed the entire bugger species. The novel shows Ender to be morally innocent throughout his story, but he takes on the guilt of xenocide of the buggers. He is shocked at what he did, even when he didn’t know what he’s doing. Ender loses his innocence at this moment. He knew he was being manipulated by the adults throughout his career at the battle schools, but he had no idea he was being manipulated into exterminating a whole race. When he realizes what he did he goes into another depression slump and does not come out of his room for days. He doesn’t understand why he was manipulated into what he
book was blander. The book did not catch my attention as much. The movie really caught my
Ender’s Game involves five types of conflicts. Man vs. Man: According to the children, “The teachers, they’re the enemy. They get us to fight each other, to hate each other…the old bastards are watching us, studying us, discovering our weak points, deciding...
For example, Mama goes to the bank in the movie and is given a hard time about paying her mortgage, but this did not happen in the book. Another major difference is that the school bus scene, where the Logan kids played a trick on the white kids, was not shown in the movie, even though it was an important part of the story. There are some character changes as well. Lillian Jean, Jeremy, R.W, and Melvin are Simms’ in the book, but in the movie they are Kaleb Wallace’s children. However, the main plot difference is how the movie starts in the middle, summarizing everything from the first part of the book very briefly. Additionally, many scenes are switched around and placed out of order. Altogether, the plot and character changes contribute to my unfavorable impression of the
Second there is more detail in the book than the movie. Well, I think that more detail is better because the more you know the better you understand the movie or
In conclusion, details involving the characters and symbolic meanings to objects are the factors that make the novel better than the movie. Leaving out aspects of the novel limits the viewer’s appreciation for the story. One may favor the film over the novel or vice versa, but that person will not overlook the intense work that went into the making of both. The film and novel have their similarities and differences, but both effectively communicate their meaning to the public.
Sinha-Roy, Piya. "'Ender's Game' Explores Complexity of Youth, Isolation and Warfare." Reuters. Thomson Reuters, 30 Oct. 2013. Web. 21 Mar. 2014. Web.
The biggest difference is that the film included two characters who were not mentioned in the book, and both characters played important roles. The first was the fisherman who discovered Grendel and warned the village, and the second was the man who stole the dragon’s treasure and made it attack the village. Another key difference is that the movie did not include a heated argument between Unferth and Beowulf. In the book, Unferth accuses Beowulf of being unworthy to challenge Grendel and claims that he will die if he tries. He says this out of spite because he wants the fame and glory for himself. In the movie, Unferth does not make as big of a scene. In the book he makes such a big scene that he causes some villagers to question the abilities of Beowulf and wonder if he can actually protect them and not make Grendel even more blood-thirsty. Despite these differences, the endings to both stories were virtually identical. This was important because it helped keep the stories closer to each other. Both accounts of the tale followed the same basic story, but the novel did a better job because it had more details and better portrayed the life of Beowulf. It is clear in the book that Beowulf’s people thought very highly of him and were grateful for his protection and leadership. In the closing paragraph, the novel shows how
People always say that the book is better than the movie, and though they think they might be right, this isn't always the case. People like having the background knowledge of why a character is doing something in a specific case or why the events are happening and seeing the movie cut out all this extra information may upset them, but that doesn't mean that the book is better. It just means they're more informed reading the book. What is a bad movie? Not having enough information or just not being entertained. I happened to watch the movie before I read the book and I thought it was amazing, but after I read the book the movie just didn't compare to the book. Sure they had the same storyline but I was just more entertained reading the book. That doesn't mean that the movie suddenly wasn't as amazing, because it certainly was, it just means that the two different forms of art have their own unique way of being good. The Hunger Games, a story of 24 kids chosen at random to compete in a Game where they must fight to the death, can be told in different ways. Whereas the book is written in Katniss’ point of view, we get more in depth detail of Katniss’ thought process and characterization, in the film we lose the sense of what makes Katniss a hero, since it focuses more in the technological point of view and how it is used to control the citizens.