Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Comparison of luke and matthew
Comparison of luke and matthew
Compare and contrast the narrative birth of jesus in luke and matthew
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Comparison of luke and matthew
The Bible is a large and rather confusing book of laws, parables and true stories. The most important story in the Bible, in the story of Jesus ' birth. These two passages which tell of Jesus ' birth are, especially because Christians, at least the majority of them, base their beliefs on it, along with his death. Matthew and Luke are the only two books out of the sixty-six in the bible which give detailed descriptions of the monumental event. There is the main idea in American culture that the Birth story is clear, that there are not any issues between Matthew and Luke 's stories. However, there are many conflicting facts in the two books, although most of them are easily thought, though, there are some that are a little harder to explain, …show more content…
In Matthew, it does exactly state the location at the time of the birth, when the Magi go to visit Jesus, they are led to a house in Bethlehem (Matt 2:7-11 NRSV). However, there is no timing for context, this could have accorded directly after the birth or a year later. Therefore, the place of birth could very well have been in the same place and then later Joseph, Mary and Jesus moved into their own home where the Magi could have visited them. The Magi in Matthew and the Shepherds in Luke also do not contradict each other in the slightest, as it is quite possible that they were two separate events in time. The fact that the Magi are exclusively in Matthew and Shepherds in Luke, is odd, however, it can still be explained by the authors being two different individuals with divergent views on what is important in one …show more content…
Because it is quite different in the two books, for one thing, Luke and Matthew have different ending points. Matthew only traces the line from Abraham, whereas Luke goes all the way back to Adam. This is not a real issue but it is interesting why they would choose to do this in such different manners. The real issue is the fact that, there only a few names that match between the two. In fact, between Jesus and David only two names match, Shealtiel and Zerubbabel. This could be a real issue for believers, except for the fact that it does not really matter. Joseph was not Jesus ' true father, that is the basis of the Christian faith. This begs the question, why did Matthew and Luke both put this genealogy in if it does not pertain to Jesus in the slightest? Because that is just how it was done, when someone of great importance was written about, the history of that person 's ancestors was also given. Matthew and Luke would not have thought to not give the genealogy, it was a tradition, even if the genealogy they gave was to someone not related to
The authors of the Gospel According to Matthew, and the Gospel According to Luke made some considerable modifications, deletions, and additions to the Gospel of Mark. To the average reader the changes seem rather significant and one might ask why these changes were made. Well, there are several reasons why these changes were made. For example, the authors wanted to show readers that Jesus was more holy than the original author set him out to be. Also, the authors sought after to express the gospel in, what they thought, were better words to make it appear more authentic. Furthermore the authors of the Gospel According to Matthew and the Gospel According to Luke wanted simply to modify the text because they didn’t see eye to eye with what the original author said.
A controversy of immense silliness has recently broken out among Evangelicals regarding the validity of modern, conservative translations of the Bible like the New American Standard, the New International, and the New King James. The controversy was ignited by a book written by Gail Riplinger entitled New Age Bible Versions.
The most discussed character in the birth of Christ from the book of Matthew is Joseph. His role as Jesus’ earthly father is discussed. The most discussed character in the birth of Christ from the book of Luke is the Virgin Mary. The legitimacy of her virgin birth is explained. Jesus is given the additional name “Immanuel” in the book of Matthew. He is given the name, “The Son of the Most High God” in the book of Luke.
The Gospels of Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John are the origin of nearly everything the Christian Church teaches about Jesus. The Gospels, in turn, serve as the scale or test of truth and authenticity of everything the church teaches about Jesus. It is said that the Gospels are the link between Jesus of Nazareth and the people of every age throughout history who have claimed to be his followers. Although the Gospels teach us about Jesus’ life they may not provide concrete evidence that what they speak of is true there are several other sources.
When you think of Sabbath, you think of a holy day, a day of rest and relaxation for both man and animals. The word Sabbath comes from the Hebrew word meaning “day of rest”. The Sabbath day is God’s day of relaxation after he finished the creation of the earth. Matthew, Mark, and Luke each tell about the Sabbath dispute, but each gospel tells their story differently.
The author’s intent is Christological. Jesus is the Son of God. He is God amongst us. Recognized titles in Matthew include Christ, Son of God, Son of Man, Son of David, King, Immanuel. In addition, “the allusions and actions of Jesus of Matthew’s Jesus also communicate his Messianic claims.”2 The Gospel functions as a teaching tool and can be used liturgically. The author of Matthew intended it to be read and for his audience to understand, be engaged in and appreciate the literary devices and references. He “did not write for bad or casual readers, but in stead for good and attentive listeners. The ancient audiences were “accustomed to retain minute textual details”.3
The birth narrative of Matthew begins with a long genealogy of Jesus, which basically shows how Jesus is son of Abraham who is the father of the nation of Israel, and David the King of the Jews. This may not seem important but this genealogy shows how Jesus is connected to the Davidic line. Then we have Mary, who just found out she was pregnant and Joseph decides it is best to divorce her because he wanted to break his union with someone who is pregnant, by someone else. But behold the angel comes down and reassures Joseph that Mary was pregnant by the Holy Spirit and that he should take her back into his house. The angel also said to name the child Emmanuel. When Jesus was born in Bethlehem, and King Herod heard of this new newborn king of the Jews and he ordered that all boys under the age of 2 be killed. The magi gave Jesus the gifts and left. In a dream, the angel of the lord told Joseph to take the child and go to Egypt and hide, Herod then died, and Jesus was safe.
At the start of the Gospel Mark, he does not speak of the birth of Jesus. When reading through the Gospels of Luke and Matthew none the stories are the same, they are quite different. In Luke, he talks about the salvation of God is for the entire world. When you read the Gospel of Luke, Jesus roots trace back to Adam. Why Adam, because he was the first man created by God. Gospel of Luke does say Jesus is a descendant of the Jews. But if you read more into scriptures it says that Jesus belongs to the world, not to the
The book of Luke, found after the books Matthew and Mark, focuses on the ministry of Jesus Christ but it also gives us a look into His birth and growth in totality. In this chapter we see a historical account of some of the journeys that Christ experienced. It is important to keep in mind that the Bible and all of its books do serve as historical accounts but each book is unique in the fact that they incorporate a theological timeline. The Bible is, conceivably, the most important book that has ever been written. It gives the world eyewitness accounts to historical events that helped not only shaped a region of the world but the whole entire world. It is nearly impossible to go through some formal societal education and have never once read a part of the bible or have heard a story that adapts from the stories within the bible. The bible has helped formed institutions, associations and so much more. By reading the Gospel of Luke we are truly reading what is meant for us to read as Christians. The principal plot in the book of Luke is the life of Jesus Christ, his sacrifice, His ability to beat death and remain perfect as the son of GOD despite being human as well. Jesus is seen as the perfect savior for humans in the book of Luke. Luke not only gives multiple examples of the power of Jesus but also it gives us a look at The Lord’s triumph over temptation. Luke also depicts Jesus as a man/GOD who had a very deep concentration on people and relationships. The book of Luke gives Jesus a loving characteristic but doesn’t shy away from showing that at times Jesus got angry too. Jesus showed a great deal of compassion to the sick, those in pain, the poor, and unambiguously the sinful. Jesus had genuine love for everyone. Throughout this...
Jesus was born in Bethlehem as told in the Gospel references Matthew 1:18-25; Matthew 2:1-12; Luke 1:26-38; Luke 2:1-20. This is also backed up through historical evidence in terms of the Star of David and the Three Wise Men.
There are many versions to the same story. There are the heroes and the villain’s side, the conquered and the defeated. However, there are some accounts that have been recorded as true to make the people involved to look more superior than they really where in that event. The event that can be looked at is the battle between the Neo-Assyrians and the Jews of Judah. Each side has its own version of what happened. They also both have their own gods participating in the story in some way. So reading both accounts of the event can tell us how the fighting went and may leave us with new questions.
Matthews’s intentions are to link Jesus to the Prophesies and great Patriarchal figures such as Moses concerning the coming of the Messiah. At the start of Matthews gospel is the genealogy to show the unbroken line from Abraham through David to the husband of Mary, Joseph. I think it is worth briefly mentioning gematria here a numerological study assigned to words and letters, there appears a manipulation by Matthew counting Jechonia twice. Scholars have noted this means there are 42 generations between Abraham, Mary and Joseph, 42 has a scriptural symbolic reference to the unfolding of God’s plan. All the names in each set is 86.8, 80 is the number of salvation, and 6 is the number of man. Has Matthew left us an encrypted message, is the son of David represented by the number 14? The answer is unclear by the author but we must acknowledge the manipulation of information as Matthew trying to prove the Jewish heritage of Jesus, born of the spirit, adopted son of Joseph, son of David and son of Abraham.
Since Matthew and Luke are not modern day biographies, they do not follow the standard that we imagine. I think the explanation for the combination of similarities and differences comes from the fact that the Matthew and Luke are styled differently and also have different audiences. Since Matthew and Luke are interpreting history for a specific audience, this would explain why Matthew and Luke contains differing details. For example, Matthew tells of the Wise Men that came to visit Jesus in Matt.2:1-12 while Luke tells of shepherds that came to visit Jesus in Luke 2:8-20. Since Matthew is styled for a Jewish audience, perhaps it is considered more impactful and stunning that wise philosophers came to worship a child. On the other hand,
...rning the declination of invitations, whereas Luke goes further into detail. Also, the Gospel of Matthew offers a shorter summary in comparison to Luke and includes the second part of the parable, Mt 22:11-14. (Lester 308)
The reason that the Gospel of Matthew is in the first place among the four Gospels is due to the early church tradition that Matthew was the earliest one who recorded Lord’s word and Jesus stories. In the fifth century, Augustine of Hippo claimed that "the canonical order of the four Gospels was the chronological order." In the late-eighteenth century, J. J. Griesbach stated that The Gospel of Mark was a short version of the combination of the Gospel of Matthew and the Gospel of Luke. In the nineteenth century, German scholars concluded that the Gospel of Matthew was preceded by the Gospel of Mark and Matthew used the Gospel of Mark as his primary source. No matter which theory that most New Testament scholars accept, Matthew did not simply copy sources from other Gospels, but also included his own ideas and quoted verses from the Old Testament. So the question of readers should rise is "How strong relationship did the Gospel of Matthew have with the Old Testament?" or "How accurately did Matthew use the Old Testament?