Comparing Film Trailers of Mission Impossible Two and Gladiator In the essay I will compare and analyse the two film trailers I have been studying, ‘Mission Impossible 2’ and ‘Gladiator’. I will analyse and compare the different techniques used. These techniques are; Use of characters, lighting and colour, camera shots and angles, sound and music and editing and framing. In doing this I will be able to show how effective each trailer is in attracting an audience. Film trailers are an important form of advertising for a film. They should convey the genre of the film and most importantly, include enough visual information to allow us to recognise what the film’s story line is. However, a film trailer should not include too much information about it, or show any scenes that are not suitable for younger viewers. It should also try to attract a certain target audience by almost making the film seem better than it actually is, but not lead the viewer to false pretences, and making them think it is about something it is not. To begin, in ‘Mission Impossible 2’, there are lots of different angled shots when Tom Cruise is climbing up the canyon. There is a close up to begin with, and you are able to see that he is not wearing a harness or any safety equipment. This makes his character seem fearless and the type of person who laughs in the face of danger. The moment Tom Cruise slips, the camera moves to a high-angle mid shot so that you are able to see him dangling off the edge, holding on with on hand. You can also see the vast drop that he may face if he loses his grip. This excites the audience and you are on the edge of your seat i... ... middle of paper ... ...ive language used. He says that one day he will get his revenge. This intrigues the audience as they want to know what he wants revenge for. After al of my analysing, I have decided that u prefer the ‘Mission Impossible 2’ trailer. It is a lot more exciting and I think that it advertises the film a lot better than the ‘Gladiator’ trailer. It makes the film look more action-packed and enthralling. The action scenes are more convincing then ‘Gladiator’s’ and would attract a wider audience due to al of the different types of clips featured in it. If I was to say which film looked better having just seen the trailers for each, I would definitely say ‘Mission Impossible 2’. I have been able to analyse and compare the two film trailers and decide which one I think is more effective and advertises the film best.
Have you ever seen Indiana Jones and Raiders of the Lost Ark? In that movie if you’re paying attention you can see a faithful reproduction of the biblical account of the Ark of the Covenant – the most sacred of all objects from the Bible. It is gilded with Gold, with fine woods and carvings – with the figures of two cherubs (keruvim – those who bring God close) on top – wings outstretched and barely touching at the point where God’s presence might one day descend and perhaps glow brightly like a metaphoric shining light of truth and knowledge.
frontal view, facing the viewer. He is shown standing in an open, somewhat rocky field.
War is seen as a universal concept that often causes discomfort and conflict in relation to civilians. As they are a worrying universal event that has occurred for many decades now, they posed questions to society about human's nature and civilization. Questions such as is humanity sane or insane? and do humans have an obsession with destruction vs creation. These questions are posed from the two anti-war texts; Dr Strangelove by Stanley Kubrick and Slaughterhouse Five written by Kurt Vonnegut.
with the amount of emotion he is feeling as he makes sure that he is
Comparing Dangerous Liaisons by Choderlos de Laclos and Cruel Intentions the Movie It is my intention to compare the book, Dangerous Liaisons by Choderlos de Laclos, to its modern movie version, Cruel Intentions, starring Sarah Michelle Gellar. I intend to examine how the original French text was modified in reference to plot, character, morals/values, and themes. I also plan to discuss how these transformations change the meaning of the story and reflect different cultural/historical contexts. There are some major differences between these two works, if only because of when they were written. First, the plots of both works need to be discussed and explained how they are different.
I'd be working in a place like this if I could afford a real snake?"
Rome for the end of the film. At the start of the film the central
In this paper I intend to explore the attitudes toward the value of individual life vs. the value of a community as a whole expressed in A Canticle for Leibowitz and Starship Troopers: the Movie by analyzing their treatment of information control, euthanasia, and the idea of obtaining happiness through a sense of purpose.
his falling apart; when he falls to his hands and knees it shows the extent of his sorrow.
role in ID as one of the main heroes. The film also has sub-genres to
his face whereas in the BBC's we can see the top half of his body.
the battle as a haze. The music then begins to go quieter and at this
hands. He also has thin legs which are very long. Hawkeye is much like a Metis
...the eye because the fabric of his shirt and the roughness of his jeans appear to have texture but they do not. If you actually touch the painting, you will find it to be flat and it does not have that feeling of thick application of paint.
“The Mission” is based on a true story that occurred around the borderlands of Argentina, Paraguay and Brazil in the years 1750’s according to the film and history. The Treaty of Madrid of 1750 with the Spanish and Portuguese caused both havoc and death for the people of the Guarini and the members of the Jesuits. The Jesuits, members of the church, tried to bring Christianity and civilization to the natives while keeping at peace with Spain and Portugal. The Jesuits were the teachers for the natives; Teaching them not only the Christian religion but also civilization. Father Gabriel, a Jesuit, is first introduced in the film when he is showing his respects to a former Jesuit priest killed by the natives. He walks through the South American