Compare And Contrast Rainsford Vs General Zaroff

638 Words2 Pages

Sanger Rainsford vs. General Zaroff In the short story, “The Most Dangerous Game,” by Richard Connell, Sanger Rainsford, a famous hunter, finds himself on Ship-Trap Island after falling overboard a yacht. After arriving on the island, he meets its owner, General Zaroff, another avid hunter. He soon discovers that General Zaroff has grown bored of hunting animals, and now he hunts men he traps on the island. The protagonist, Rainsford and the antagonist, General Zaroff have conflicting morals, character, attitudes, and personalities. These differences cause them to become mortal enemies, pitted against each other in a game to the death. During the rising action of the story, General Zaroff explains to Rainsford that he hunts humans because he has become …show more content…

Rainsford is disgusted by Zaroff, and says, “Hunting? Great Guns, General Zaroff. This is a grisly joke,” (8). Zaroff dismisses Rainsford’s feelings and refuses to believe “that so modern and civilized a young man as you seem to be harbors romantic ideas about the value of human life,” (8). In the narrative only one of these men go through changes in their character. Rainsford is a dynamic character who goes from disregarding how the “huntee” feels, to keenly understanding their fear and pain. During the exposition of the story, Rainsford tells his hunting partner, Whitney, “Who cares how a jaguar feels?” Then, during the falling action of the story, he takes the place of a huntee, and he is able to understand what they feel. Rainsford also experiences a shift in morals considering he declares during the rising action that his experience in the war did not make him “condone cold-blooded murder” (8). In the resolution, the general says, “One of us is to furnish a repast for the hounds. The other will sleep in this very excellent bed. On guard, Rainsford.” Rainsford fights Zaroff and feeds him to the hounds,

Open Document