Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Introduction on an essay about language acquisition theories
Language acquisition nature
Language acquisition nature
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Language acquisition is the processes by humans learn to perceive and communicate language as well as being able to produce words and sentences to communicate. It is one of the most essential human traits. First Language acquisition refers to the study of acquisition of first language in children. There are several theories on how children’s acquire such a complex understanding of language from young age. The theories are mainly based on two conflicting sides, namely nature (humans are born with a biological instinct for language built in them) or nurture (humans learn language through social interaction.) ("Language and Linguistics: Language Learning").
The main theory that is used in arguing on side of nature as a contributor to first language acquisition is mainly based on the Innateness Theory. This theory states that children are equipped with an innate template for language almost as if language is a biologically controlled behaviour. The innateness theory is mainly credited to Noam Chomsky and stems from the Universal Grammar theory. The universal grammar is very similar to the innateness theory and proposes that the ability to learn grammar is hard wired into the brain, suggesting that linguistic ability manifests itself without being taught and that this is a property that all humans share, hence a biological instinctual behavior. (Noam Chomsky, Gale Encyclopedia of Psychology) Eric Lenneberg has come up with a criterion for determining whether or not something is biologically controlled. They are as follows:
• The behavior emerges before it seems necessary.
• Its appearance is not the result of a conscious decision.
• Its emergence is not triggered by external events (though the surrounding environment must be suffic...
... middle of paper ...
...rocessing. It has also demonstrated that being fluent in two or more languages from early childhood enhances a person’s ability to concentrate and protect against the onset of dementia and other age-related cognitive decline. (Perry)
Language acquisition is closely linked together with linguistic relativity because the effect of language on thought may vary from first language to second language, as well as with proficiency. If an individual were to speak more than one language they might have different effects on them while they are speaking the respective languages; or they might have combinatory effect on their thought process with their differing structures. The age the second or third language is learnt might also come into play since it was mentioned that people who learn additional language in their adult life rarely reach the proficiency of native speakers.
Language acquisition begins with babies. The initial sounds are babbling and cooing, then they try to imitate what they hear. Eventually, they can say a word. They learn the rules and grammar of their home language Rowe and Levine)
Language is considered one of the attributes that define human beings as a unique species. We are the only species able to employ complex language to communicate our feelings, intentions and also to teach others. Although language is such an exclusive and intricate skill, infants can learn it fairly quickly. Child vocabulary grows very fast once they say their first words growing from 5-20 words at 18-months to about 6000 words by the age of 5 (Bates, 2003). This remarkable ability to acquire language is the basis for a central debate: how much of our ability to acquire, produce and understand language is innate (genetically programmed) and how much is acquired by learning? This essay will focus on the debate between nature and nurture and how research in the area of language produced evidence for both sides of the argument.
Citron, J. L. (1993). The Role of Ethno-Lingual Relativity in Second Language Acquisition. Working Papers in Educational Linguistics, 9, 29-41.
The behaviorist theory of language acquisition believe that children are born with the ability to learn, but must be taught language, by means of constant repetition and positive (or negative) reinforcement by an adult. They believe children use a “trial and error” approach to learn system or language etiquette needed to be used in their environment.
This essay is about a child’s development and learning, focusing primarily on language development. It will describe the main stages of developmental "milestones" and the key concepts involved for children to develop their language skills, discussing language acquisition and social learning theory. The essay will also look into the key theorists involved in language development, primarily Vygotsky and Chomsky, and how these theories have had an impact on the way society views language and their implementation within schools. The essay will describe the factors affecting language development, both biological and environmental. While also discussing key arguments among theorists, one being the nature vs nurture debate, and how these play a part in the teaching in schools.
5) The Biological Foundations of Language, Does Empirical Evidence Support Innateness of Language? by Bora Lee.
There are three main theories of child language acquisition; Cognitive Theory, Imitation and Positive Reinforcement, and Innateness of Certain Linguistic Features (Linguistics 201). All three theories offer a substantial amount of proof and experiments, but none of them have been proven entirely correct. The search for how children acquire their native language in such a short period of time has been studied for many centuries. In a changing world, it is difficult to pinpoint any definite specifics of language because of the diversity and modification throughout thousands of millions of years.
There is a “CORELATION” between the effects of “BILINGUALISM AND THE COGNITIVE DEVELOPMENT OF CHILDREN”.
This essay is going to illustrate the different stages in language acquisition that children pass through and elicit the theories in accordance.
How do children acquire language? What are the processes of language acquisition? How do infants respond to speech? Language acquisition is the process of learning a native or a second language. Although how children learn to speak is not perfectly understood, most explanations involve both the observations that children copy what they hear and the inference that human beings have a natural aptitude for understanding grammar. Children usually learn the sounds and vocabulary of their native language through imitation, (which helps them learn to pronounce words correctly), and grammar is seldom taught to them, but instead that they rapidly acquire the ability to speak grammatically. Though, not all children learn by imitation alone. Children will produce forms of language that adults never say. For example, “I spilled milk on hisself” or “Debbie wants a cookie”. This demonstrates that children have the desire to speak correctly and have self-motivating traits to communicate. This supports the theory of Noam Chomsky (1972)-that children are able to learn grammar of a particular language because all intelligible languages are founded on a deep structure of universal grammatical rules that corresponds to an innate capacity of the human brain. Adults learning a second language pass through some of the same stages, as do children learning their native language. In the first part of this paper I will describe the process of language acquisition. The second part will review how infants respond to speech.
The study of language development, one of the most fascinating human achievements, has a long and rich history, extending over thousands of years (Chomsky, 2000). As the nature-versus-nurture argument is inevitable to arise whenever human behaviors are discussed, it is not surprising that language experts have debated the relative influences of genetics and the environment on language development (Hulit & Howard, 2002). Among the various proposals concerning the mechanisms involved in acquiring a language, two opposing theoretical positions, the behaviorist and the nativist, are the most prominent and influential ones (Ayoun, 2003; Garton & Pratt, 1998; Owens, 2001). Due to the indefinite explanation of the exact process, the continuous interest of the inquiring people, and the sheer significance of the precise result, the controversy remains ongoing and popular. In view of the more obvious limitations of the behaviorist interpretation and the prevailing contributions of the nativist interpretation, the latter one is more rational to accept.
Language acquisition is perhaps one of the most debated issues of human development. Various theories and approaches have emerged over the years to study and analyse this developmental process. One factor contributing to the differing theories is the debate between nature v’s nurture. A question commonly asked is: Do humans a...
Still today, it is the commonly held belief that children acquire their mother tongue through imitation of the parents, caregivers or the people in their environment. Linguists too had the same conviction until 1957, when a then relatively unknown man, A. Noam Chomsky, propounded his theory that the capacity to acquire language is in fact innate. This revolutionized the study of language acquisition, and after a brief period of controversy upon the publication of his book, Aspects of the Theory of Syntax, in 1964, his theories are now generally accepted as largely true. As a consequence, he was responsible for the emergence of a new field during the 1960s, Developmental Psycholinguistics, which deals with children’s first language acquisition. He was not the first to question our hitherto mute acceptance of a debatable concept – long before, Plato wondered how children could possibly acquire so complex a skill as language with so little experience of life. Experiments have clearly identified an ability to discern syntactical nuances in very young infants, although they are still at the pre-linguistic stage. Children of three, however, are able to manipulate very complicated syntactical sentences, although they are unable to tie their own shoelaces, for example. Indeed, language is not a skill such as many others, like learning to drive or perform mathematical operations – it cannot be taught as such in these early stages. Rather, it is the acquisition of language which fascinates linguists today, and how it is possible. Noam Chomsky turned the world’s eyes to this enigmatic question at a time when it was assumed to have a deceptively simple explanation.
Nearly every member of the human race learns a language or more to the degree of proficiency only in the first few years of life. How children achieve this astonishing skill in such little time sparks controversial debates among linguists, psychologists, and scientists throughout centuries. Some believe that language is an innate ability possessed by all human beings due to the remarkable function of the brain while others maintain that language is learned from childhood experience. However, many are beginning to realize that nature and nurture go hand-in-hand when explaining how children develop their language(s). Despite the claims that language is either pre-learned or environmentally learned alone, the combination of both genes
Language acquisition requires meaningful interaction in the target language with natural communication while children are acquiring the foreign language. Children usually concerned with message which they are conveying and understand not with the form of utterances. These utterances are initiated by the acquired systems and the fluency of language is based on what we have ‘picked up’ through active communication. Both formal knowledge and conscious learning of the second language learning may be alternate to the output of the system, sometimes before and sometimes after the