Analyzing Connected Speech Processes in Faye's Utterance

1326 Words3 Pages

Within this utterance from Faye, four types of connected speech processes have been demonstrated. Firstly, Faye demonstrated the connected speech process of deletion in the word “just” by deleting the final consonant /t/. In isolation form, the word “just” would be pronounced as /ʤəst/, with the inclusion of the final consonant /t/. Secondly, in this utterance there was a reduction of vowels to an unstressed form by implementing a /ə/ into the function word “of”. This reduction of a vowel to a schwa in Faye’s utterance is due to a lack of stress on this function word in connected speech. In isolation form, the word “of” would be pronounced as /ɔʄ/. A second instance of reducing vowels to an unstressed form occurs in the utterance “to”, by implementing a schwa in place of a /ʉː/. In isolation, the word “to” would be pronounced as /tʉː/. A third connected speech process that has been demonstrated in Faye’s utterance is segment deletion from the removal of the unstressed syllable from “family” in connected speech, taking this word from three syllables to two syllables. In isolation form, the word “family” would be pronounced as /ʄæməliː/. Lastly, in the word “trying” the final velar nasal consonant was replaced …show more content…

Faye’s non-standard patterns of Australian English directly link with her Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander cultural background. A distinct difference between Faye and Lisa is that Faye has placed a past participle in place of the standard past-tense form to omit the verb “have” in her utterance. This grammatical pattern has shortened Faye’s utterance and unspecified the tense in which she had viewed the treatment of her people. In comparison, Lisa has used the standard Australian English grammatical patterns of conjunctions, tense and personal pronouns to display her identification with the medical profession values, norms and

Open Document