Character Analysis Of Larry Brown's Father And Son

1154 Words3 Pages

Most novels have a good main character and even the bad ones have qualities that make them likable. This, however, is not the case with Larry Brown’s novel Father And Son. From the day Glen gets out of prison to the day he dies, his actions are despicable. Bobby on the other hand is a great contrast to this detestable character. Glen and Bobby are a great example of a major theme of this novel, good vs. evil. Other examples are Mary and Emma, and old and new Virgil. Emma raised Glen and his brothers along with Virgil while Mary had to raise Bobby alone. Emma was bitter about Mary and Bobby and possibly passed it on to Glen by saying things like, “That whore of his, that’s where he goes” (165). Not to mention the fact that this was said while …show more content…

The reader does not witness Virgil’s bad side but it is referenced. We know that Virgil was a drunk and left guns lying around the house which ultimately led to the death of Theron. He was a careless dad to his three kids and this is probably what made him change years later. In the book’s present we see how he cares for David and does all the things he should have done as a father. At the end of the book David is described as a “precious bundle” and it says, “[Virgil] held David close to him as if to protect him from any harm” (347). Maybe Virgil held David as the only connection left to his dead son or maybe because he was trying to protect him from being hurt by the world they live in. Virgil tried so hard to change and everybody could see he had changed except for Glen. Glen still remembered the man who was around when he was a kid, he still remembered the things his mother had said about his dad and him cheating on his mother even though her accusations were false. When Emma was still alive, Virgil did leave her alone a lot to go drink and do other things but, when she died he kept her clothes for a while. He used his own money to pay for the funeral and even though he had yet to put a headstone on her grave it wasn 't because he had spent the money on whiskey he simply hadn 't gotten around to it. Virgil fathered both Glen and Bobby and it seems as though Glen got Virgil’s bad while Bobby inherited his …show more content…

It is hard to imagine all the things he did in the five days he was out of prison. On his first day back, he saw Erline Price and saw how grown up she’d become. Later on they drink together and they go back to his place. The book says, “He did it slow long and hard and even when he saw that she was bleeding he kept on” (115). It takes a special kind of evil to do what he did. He was careful to not hurt her in a way that could be seen by other which is almost more damaging because it means that no one will no, nobody will ask where she got hurt, she has no reason to tell people because they will not ask and she will not tell unless they do. His actions where thought out and methodical, it didn 't happen in the heat of the moment. The only time he shows any decency is when he lets the fish go because it was pretty and it had never done anything to him. In five days he did hundreds of things and out of all of those this was the only good thing he did. Bobby on the other hand did no wrong in this book. He even let Byers have a moment with his dad. When he did become sheriff he even tried to give Glen as many chances as he could but it was useless. Bobby was everything Glen couldn 't be. It might be due to who they were both raised by but a person’s personality can only be affected a limited amount by environment. Bobby is the one who fixes what Glen ruins.

Open Document