Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Alternative assessment examples
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Shivapakiam, better known as Shiva, is a twenty-two year old, timid lady. She does not easily open up or even speak to anyone out of her comfort zone. She has only one best friend whom she knows since she was seven. Shiva lives in a double story terrace apartment with her parents and siblings. Unlike her two younger sisters, who wears the latest designer clothes and carries designer bags, Shiva always prefers to keep it simple. As her parents are workaholics, Shiva is portrayed as a motherly figure to her younger sisters. She never fails to look after them as well as herself concentrate in her university studies. Moreover, she is also in charge of the cleanliness and tidiness of her house. With seldom help from her siblings, she cleans the house five times a week by arranging everything in her house in a neat order. Shiva also has a habit of labeling important things around her house as she finds it useful in finding them when she urgently needs it. Nevertheless, during her little free time, she always indulges herself with art and poetry. Shiva is an overall calm person, but only becomes furious is when things doesn’t go her way and she goes all out to be very persistent in what she wants. As Shiva is studying in a university, almost every day she is occupied with assignments, exams and her most hated class presentations. Shiva have noticed that when it comes to her exam period she gets extremely nervous and anxious, till she breaks down and seeks her best friend for comfort. Assessment Tools Shiva was requested to complete three various assessment tools and these assessment tools were used to assess and evaluate Shiva’s personality. The three assessment tools were, NEO Personality Inventory – Revised (NEO-PI-R), A Psychodyn... ... middle of paper ... ... from http://www.acer.edu.au/documents/sample_reports/neo-pir-sample.pdf Gignac, G. E., Jang, K. L., & Bates, T. C. (2009). Construct redundancy within the Five-Factor Model as measured by the NEO PI-R:. Implications for emotional intelligence and incremental coherence,51(1), 76-86. McAdams, D. P. (2009). The person: An introduction to the science of personality psychology (5th ed.). Hoboken, N.J: Wiley. Morasco, B. J., Gfeller, J. D., & Elder, K. A. (2007). The Utility of the NEO–PI–R Validity Scales to Detect Response Distortion: A Comparison With the MMPI–2. Journal of Personality Assessment, 88(3), 227-281. doi:10.1080/00223890701293924 Shedler, J. (2010). The Efficacy of Psychodynamic Psychotherapy.American Psychologist, 65(2), 98-109. doi:10.1037/a0018378 Stannard, D. E. (2001). Shrinking History. On Freud and the Failure of Psychohistory, 47-67
Applied Neuropsychology: Adult, 21(2), 1-8. Paunonen, S., & Ashton, M. (2001). Big five factors and facets and the prediction of behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(1), 524-539. Pittenger, D. (2005).
From a methodological perspective, this model presents a serious threat to the reliability and validity of personality assessments. The potential influence of psychopathology on personality assessments would preclude the consistency (i.e., reliability) of those measures. A clinical implication is that assessments completed at hospitalization intake are likely impacted by psychopathology; results must then be interpreted with caution. However, if assessments should be administered at the end of treatment to get a more accurate depiction of personality after the disorder has (hopefully) remitted, clinicians are left with less initial information about the patient. This will create problems for treatment planning, particularly with regard to whether a personality disorder or Axis I disorder should be
Cervone, D., Pervin, L. A. (2008). Personality: Theory and research (10th Ed.). New York: Wiley.
Utility of assessment. Why are these types of personality assessments useful? Did you find the results useful? Why or why not?
Funder, David C. The Personality Puzzle. 6th ed. 2013. New York: New York: W.W. Norton & Company.
Schultz, D. P., & Schultz, S. E. (2013). Theories of personality (10th ed.). Belmont, CA: Cengage/Wadsworth.
Feist, J., & Feist, G. J. (2009). Theories of Personality (7th ed.). New York, New York: McGraw-Hill.
International personality item pool test is a tool that is used in psychology to assess various aspects of an individual. It was created in the year 1999 by Goldberg, and the aspects that it assesses are emotional stability, agreeableness, openness, extraversion, and conscientiousness (Goldberg et al., 2006). These are personality elements that psychologists can use when describing an individual. It was a tool that was aimed at standardising the people’s psychological assessment, and it contains 50 questions (Goldberg, 2001). The five elements that it contains are divided into six subscales. It is a tool that has been widely used by researchers when looking at the differences between ethnic groups; genders; and age groups.
In the field of psychology, personality refers to the unique characteristics and behavior patterns that distinguish one individual from another. Personality can be a complex spectrum to evaluate. Personality of is not always stable and may change over time for different reasons such as shocking events, education, and environment to name a few. The study and assessment of personality has been used to describe and discover from severe mental disorders to assist self-awareness. Personality inventories are a method to assess personality traits. These evaluation methods arose from the need to understand and treat the effects of war on soldiers’ personality. Personality inventories have evolved over time and today are used in several fields: education, research, clinical, counseling, and industrial / organizational. This paper aims to explore and offer details of one of these personality inventories: The Sixteen Personality Factors Questionnaire (16PF).
Schultz, D. P., & Schultz, S. E. (2013). Theories of personality (10th ed.). Belmont, CA: Cengage/Wadsworth.
f. The questionnaire is useful in measuring personality traits, but should not be the ultimate definer. There were some test-retest and inter-rater discrepancies that were significant enough to question the validity of the questionnaire on some traits, such as emotional stability.The most common feedback was that the rater did not know how to rate some of the statements because it depended on the situation, and thus the rater gave more moderate scores. However, the generality of the questions cannot be avoided since personality is how these traits are exhibited over time and situations.
Matthews, G., Deary, I. J., & Whiteman, M. C. (2009). Personality traits. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Costa, P. r., & McCrae, R. R. (1988). From catalog to classification: Murray's needs and the five-factor model. Journal Of Personality And Social Psychology, 55(2), 258-265. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.55.2.258
Before taking this test, I began to think every open-minded about this five factor personality assessment. During this assessment, I realized that I was asked too little of information for this assessment to determine my exact personality. After, I received this screen telling my personality. There were five main factors and I was also told a score for all five factors. The factors were extraversion, agreeableness, conscientiousness, neuroticism, and openness.
People are complex beings with complex minds and there are many intriguing individuals one can attempt to analyze. One such example is Donald Trump. It can be incredibly difficult to dissect a personality, especially one like his, in order to see into their lives and get an idea of who they are why they do what they do. In Dan P. McAdams’ What Do We Know When We Know A Person?, personalities are broken down into three levels. Level one consists of non-conditional and broad decontextualized traits such as the Big Five (extraversion, openness, agreeableness, conscientiousness, and neuroticism) and provides a dispositional description of personality (McAdams, 1995). Level two digs deeper, including personal concerns and strivings, defense mechanisms, coping methods, motivations, and life tasks (McAdams, 1995). Beyond that lies level three, a person’s identity and life story that makes up one’s personality. By delving into the personality levels of Donald Trump, one can get a better idea of what makes him do what he does.