Authoritarian High Modernism Chapter 1 Summary

549 Words2 Pages

In chapter 3 of his book “Authoritarian High Modernism,” James Scott discusses the way in which the modern state has become authoritative by seeking control people’s public and private lives. At the beginning of the chapter, it is said that the modern state has become utopian by trying to create an ordered society where the government knows about every movement and location of citizens. Scott argues that the modern state uses physical planning of the built environment, such as cities, to help it manage people’s movements, such as where they go to work and where they live. In this way, the modern state has the characteristics of a map, which allows one to see how things are arranged or ordered. Unlike the modern state, in the state of the twentieth century, he believes that most of the troubles occurred because they represented the work of the rulers with grandiose and utopian plans for the reorganization of society, this meant that the people themselves allowed the state to establish full power, which later began to disregard democracy, violate …show more content…

Since the vision of the intelligentsia of the great future often sharply contrasts with disorder, poverty, which was the boldness of high modernism, was in some ways extremely unfair. Eventually, the laws gave way into states, which took over governing people. The final part of the chapter talks about the creation of authoritarian high modernism involved the use of technology to monitor people’s public and private lives. With the rapid development of technology, the state wants to be omnipresent; to imitate God by making sure it knows everything taking place in people’s lives. In addition, this level of technological development allowed the modern state to impose its own order on people and

Open Document