Aristotle's Connection To Ownership Of Objects

484 Words1 Page

Finding self identity and its connection to ownership of objects is perceived differently through varied thought processes. Plato believed that owning objects was detrimental to one's character. Aristotle claimed ownership of objects developed moral character. More recently, philosopher Jean-Paul Sarte felt that ownership extended past material objects to intangibles such as develop skills. All above theories are supported by incredibly renowned and brilliant men. With that in mind, the conclusion can be drawn that ownership of objects does not correlate to one extreme to the other; rather it is a dynamic that varies upon the situation.

Plato's was correct when he stated that value of objects can be injure self identity. The pursuit of wealth has serious repercussions on the character of a human. Generally, greed is a common factor in the pursuit of money. The desire to continually build wealth often blinds the seeker to the light of morals and well being of others. These values are replaced by a false sense of fulfillment in material objects. The intangible joys of life are overlooked and leave the soul empty. …show more content…

Usually this is a result of the gaining of ownership rather than the actual acquisition. To become the owner of an object one often has to work to gain it. In working for the object, such as a new car, morals and ethics are built. For many, this is most clearly demonstrated in teenage years. Here they first learn the value of a work ethic and understand the significance of other lessons learned along the way. Furthermore, the care of an object continues to build character. Respect, responsibility and even value of life can have direct correlations to ownership of

Open Document