Property Theory: The Utilitarian Theory Of Property

1818 Words4 Pages

The Utilitarian theory of property looks to maximize utility for all people when property decisions are made. The common statement for the Utilitarian property theory is that in making a property the decision should do the greatest good for the greatest amount of people. The problem with this theory comes in the definition of utility and aggregating this utility in a cost-benefit analysis. A popular unit of measure of utility, using the welfarist economics utilitarian view is using an economic measure, usually the price a person is willing to pay in the marketplace to analyze decisions through a cost-benefit mechanism. However, a strict welfarist utilitarian decision will not work in this instance as because welfarisim looks more towards …show more content…

Although the number of persons with disabilities is a growing population, that will continue to grow as baby boomers age, persons with disabilities are still a minority population. Taking into account the growth in this population is difficult as a person may develop a disability at any time whether from age, accident, or birth, and discounting this contingency in a cost-benefit analysis is difficult. Because of this many times their voices and interests may be lost in the crowd, no matter how unfair this may be. While there are laws that protect individuals with disabilities, the ADA itself has exceptions for historic property, which shows that the government at times allows historic cultural property to reign over disability accessibility. Furthermore, because it would be impossible to ask each and every person this is more of a guess that may or may not be correct as to people’s preferences which is difficult and not always fair. Therefore, although in the situation of Beacon Hill, after many questions and filling in gaps, a utilitarian analysis of the property decision would yield a victory to disability accessibility over the preservation of cultural property, it is clear that this may not always be the case and demonstrates why it may not be the best idea to analyze a decision in such a

Open Document