Argumentative Essay On Hamlet

428 Words1 Page

Hamlet is a surprising hero throughout the play. He uses his wits and the odd situation he is in to his advantage. He is the rightful heir to the throne, but his uncle takes the crown from him by marrying his mother soon after his father’s murder. Hamlet is approached by the ghost of his father and is told that his uncle killed his father. This was not shocking to Hamlet, he never trusted his uncle. We, as the audience, never see the crime on which this whole play is based around. It is told by a ghost then acted by a group of player which were given a script by Hamlet. The play begins with mimes playing a king being poisoned by the villain and a queen quickly changing her affections to the unknown poisoner; and the second play that emphasizes the queen’s fickleness and the poisoner’s sin in rhymed dialogue. …show more content…

As the play was going, Claudius ignores the play, in some productions of the play he simply isn’t paying attention. This was up to the director, but Shakespeare made it clear through his writing that Claudius was not reacting at the beginning and if he was guilty, he would have reacted if he knew what was going on. But the play itself, when he was paying attention, horrified him. When the poison was described (per Hamlets request) and poured into the sleeping king’s ear, Claudius abruptly stops the production: ‘Give o’er the play … Lights! lights! lights!’ (Act 3, Scene 2, Lines 268–70). The overall performance of this (Claudius’s) crime is too much to bear for a guilty newly-crowned king. Hamlet is delighted he can now ‘take the ghost’s word’ (Act 3, Scene 2, Lines 286). And yet, while Claudius stops the performance, he makes no public confession, he just walks out without an explanation. Hamlet accomplished his

Open Document