Argumentative Essay On Graffiti

710 Words2 Pages

Graffiti: A Vassal of Art and Voice The beauty of art is that everyone has a different opinion of what they consider art. A highly debated topic is if graffiti can be considered art. Technically speaking, it is usually vandalism but people believe it is also art. Although it is in fact vandalism, graffiti is still art because it is self-expression of the individual and can even convey powerful messages that can reach out and affect the everyday person. No matter what people say about it, Graffiti is a form of self-expression. It is important to realize the amount of talent and work required to create a piece of graffiti. The scale of such a piece can be small found on a corner to massive one taking up an entire wall. However, there are varying …show more content…

In the article “Revolution in a Can” by Blake Gopnik, he states, “The most elaborate images from Egypt, Libya, and Haiti today look very much like the 1980s paint jobs on New York subway cars and warehouse facades, and yet their point is not to function as art but to work as carriers of content and opinion” (114). In other words, graffiti is used to show how people truly feel inside. This is important because in addition to being considered art, it also serves the function of expressing oneself if that freedom does not exist. As a matter of fact pieces like this can be found all over the world. They are located on the Palestinian West Bank, on a wall on Benghazi in Libya, and in Tahrir Square in Egypt. A piece of graffiti art that epitomizes this is Begging for Change by graffiti artist Meek. The work engaged the public since it was done right near a train station. It features a homeless man holding a sign that reads, “Keep your coins, I want change”. The piece radiates a very powerful message stating how money can’t solve …show more content…

There are a great number of reasons as to why graffiti is generally looked down upon by common folk. A point often overlooked is that graffiti is vandalism. Most graffiti is in fact done without consent of the owner of which the piece actually appears on. It is illegal and that’s the bottom line. At the end of the day it is still someone’s property that is being defaced. Another key point is that gangs typically use graffiti in a variety of ways. Gangs can use it to publicize their status of power, mark territories, send messages, and warn intruders. Yet, even though it is wrong that does not mean it still isn’t art. If there were a beautiful and eye-catching mural on a wall, would most people not take a glance at it and consider it a work of art? People will realize it is art before processing the fact that it is illegal. It is a ridiculous belief that just because graffiti is done somewhere without consent, it throws out the notion that it is still art. Sure, the piece of work was done illegally but why can’t the work still be appreciated and enjoyed. Art is art wherever it is found. The location of the piece does not change that. In fact, graffiti can kill two birds with one stone. First, at the foundation it is a form of art. Second, on top of that foundation a message can be erected and directed. But as the saying goes, beauty is in the eye of the beholder.

More about Argumentative Essay On Graffiti

Open Document