Anti Participation Pros

650 Words2 Pages

Anti-Participation

Should kids get a trophy for participation? In society today, there is major controversy on how young people are treated for their participation in activities. Some argue that all kids receive a trophy based off of their participation and not on actual achievements. While others argue that only those young people that succeed in their participation should receive an award or trophy. As standard practice in today’s American culture, all participants are receiving some type of reward simply for “trying.” There are many pros and cons to participation trophies. Ultimately, all athletes are trying to win the game. Kids should not earn a trophy merely for participation. The first reason kids should not receive trophies for participation is because it does not reward the right goal. There is clearly a difference between winning and losing and the only way for children to learn the difference is to experience it. A child should be reward for putting in the extra effort and being noticed above the other children around them. Parents that are pro-participation are often worried about the issue of self-esteem. The idea of …show more content…

Kids need to work hard to get the reward that they deserve. Participation trophies are not honoring any specific accomplishments whatsoever, which is why they are often condemned. “Last month, Harrison posted on Instagram a photo and message saying he had taken away the trophies given to his 6- and 8-year-old football-playing sons. To raise his boys to be men, he said he needs them to understand that even trying “their best” shouldn’t entitle them to award.” (Ross) While there are some kids who excel over others, with participation trophies they are all acknowledged equally which isn't fair to overachieving children. This could cause kids to give up on their hard work because in the end everyone is given the same

Open Document