Have you ever faced a conflict and didn’t know what you were supposed to do? People all respond to conflict differently. Some face the conflict head-on and some people leave the conflict the way it is. Anne Frank from “Anne Frank: A Diary of a Young Girl,” Sophie Scholl from “Hitler Youth,” Elie Wiesel form “Nobel Prize Acceptance Speech” Bruno from “The Boy in the Striped Pajamas: a fable,” Winston Churchill from “Blood, Toil, Tears, and Sweat,” and few other people all responded to conflict by facing it head on and not letting opponents interfere in their ways. When facing a conflict, stand up for what you believe in. Face it head on and don’t let other people stop you. One reason to face a conflict head-on is sticking up to your opinion, …show more content…
To start off, Elie Wiesel from “Nobel Prize Acceptance Speech” explains that he is mad about how people knew about the Holocaust but never did anything. The result of that was Hitler killing a big percent of the Jews. Paragraph 8 states, “Silence encourages the tormentor.” This shows that Elie Wiesel is telling us to stand up for what you believe or else it will not make the trouble get any better. In the same way, Bruno from “The Boy in the Striped Pajamas: a fable,” explains that he doesn’t know anything and remains silent, although he knows what is happening is not a good thing. The whole plot of the story does not get any better because he doesn’t stick up for what he believes. He goes with the flow and never changes his thought of standing up. Furthermore, Watada from the online article Lt. Ehren Watada Faces Court-MArtial for Refusing to Serve in Iraq, says “I think it would have been an excellent opportunity to bring to light in a court of law, evidence and witness who could testify to the illegality and immorality of the war and its conduct.” This is saying that Watada stuck up for what he was believing, therefore what Watada is arguing for is known by other people, and the other people may help fight for this reason
This approach directly addresses the conflict and is often viewed as “might makes right” (Robin, 2002). A confrontational style usually involves high emotional levels, clear clarity of goals, weak relationship, and low concern for formalities or fear of punishment, moderate concerns for traditions, and a moderate self-concept.
“I swore never to be silent whenever and wherever human beings endure suffering and humiliation. We must take sides. Neutrality helps the oppressor, never the victim. Silence encourages the tormentor, never the tormented.” (Elie Wiesel) The Holocaust is a topic that is still not forgotten and is used by many people, as a motivation, to try not to repeat history. Many lessons can be taught from learning about the Holocaust, but to Eve Bunting and Fred Gross there is one lesson that could have changed the result of this horrible event. The Terrible Things, by Eve Bunting, and The Child of the Holocaust, by Fred Gross, both portray the same moral meaning in their presentations but use different evidence and word choice to create an overall
Speeches are given for a purpose. Whether it is for persuasion, or education, or even entertainment, they all target certain parts of people’s minds. This speech, The Perils of Indifference, was given by Elie Wiesel with intention to persuade his audience that indifference is the downfall of humanity, and also to educate his audience about his conclusions about the Holocaust and the corresponding events. He was very successful in achieving those goals. Not only was the audience enlightened, but also President Bill Clinton, and the First Lady, Hillary Clinton, themselves were deeply touched by Wiesel’s words.
Unfortunately, indifference is easy, tempting, and seductive, but there have been groups and people that have stood up for what they believe. Although, people believe these genocides can not happen now, there are many tragedies that are going on. We can learn to get involved and care for those who feel worthless from the speech. Feeling worthless or not important is worse than punishments. It is vital that we ask ourselves about the lessons we learn from the consequences of action and inaction during the Holocaust and other human rights tragedies. This can allow us not to make the same mistake
Action is the only remedy to indifference, the most insidious danger of all.” Elie Wiesel asserts that the world community is responsible to interfere when acts such as mass murder or genocide occur. He says that “silence encourages the tormentor” and “indifference is the most insidious danger of all”. One must speak out against oppression so there can be a difference. When one remains silent and doesn’t act, they are encouraging the person responsible for the genocide, not the victim.
In 1999, he was invited to speak at the Millennium Lectures, in front of the president, first lady, and other important governmental figures,. In his speech, “The Perils of Indifference”, he uses rhetorical devices to get emotional responses and to connect with the audience. He wants to create awareness of the dangers of indifference and show how there needs to be change. His speech eloquently calls out the government for their lack of response during the Holocaust, and warns against continued disregard for the struggles of others. He sees indifference as being the ally of the enemy, and without compassion there is no hope for the victims.
Elie Wiesel not only spoke on his behalf but also on behalf of all the victims of the Holocaust. His words do not only pertain to his situation but to the situations of every world crisis that has been failed to be acknowledged. Elie’s words can be related universally and makes you question, where were these people that are supposedly suppose to be the voices for the silent? The world thrives for equality but how can a world grow and unit if the people are silent. Elie makes valid points throughout the novel that can be referred to other situations in the past and are to come in the future.
These quotes are just stating some of the ways that the community could help in another dilemma if one were to occur again, stopping the reactions from the Holocaust from happening again. The tremendous amount of hardships that Elie Wiesel endured to be able to deliver this speech in front of hundreds of people heavily affect its significance. He wants nothing but the central idea of how society has done wrong, but the same society must stop their wrong doings, to be engraved in each and every being’s mind. He not only aids humanity in their mindsets, but also beautifully uses point of view, rhetorical questioning, and parallel structure to do it! However, all differences aside, society has learned from this experience one way or another.
Though his experiences in the concentration camps, Elie Wiesel has developed the belief that everyone should be an upstander and not stand silently as people are hurt. This can be seen in his Nobel Peace Prize Acceptance speech years after the end of the Holocaust and the publishing of Night, “that the world did know and
Through the Holocaust, Elie learned that silence is not an answer to oppression. At first, he couldn’t believe the cruelty and pain the Nazis were inflicting. He said, “’I could not believe that human beings were being burned in our times; the world would never tolerate such crimes,’” (Page 33, Night). Then, Elie came to realize the world was staying silent. He saw that people were suffering and dying, and all of humankind backed away in fear or indifference. Seeing this happen in the time he was at the camp made
Many people stay silent in times of dispute because they fear being judged, but in reality staying quiet and not choosing sides will never solve the situation. Elie Wiesel was a devoted Jew who was forced to suffer the horrors of the Holocaust at the young age of 15. After being shipped in cattle cars to many concentration camps, including Auschwitz, Elie began fighting for justice and equality for all people despite income, race, religion, or political views. In his Nobel Prize acceptance speech, Elie Wiesel stresses his claim that silence and neutrality will always benefit the oppressor through the use of logos, ethos, and pathos.
This theme has actually been noted by Elie Wiesel, and in his acceptance speech for the Nobel Peace Prize, has said “silence encourages the tormentor, never the tormented.”
Do your friends and family matter to you? If you are going through conflict it may be tough to overcome the battle and stay hopeful, but if you have something that gives you hope like your friends or your family and you really care about them that just may be your ticket out of conflict just like Anne Frank, the books Maus, and Dear Miss Breed. With your friends and family by your side is one of the best ways to respond to conflict. The character Vladek from the books Maus written by Art Spiegelman responds to conflict by his wife Anja.
A wiseman once said,"We should draw from the heart of suffering itself the means of inspiration and survival" (Winston Churchill). These words impacted many people throughout history. Although, Anne Frank took these words and applied them to her life. While taking resident in Germany, Anne and her family got caught in between Hitler's views on ethnicity. Because of this, Anne wrote about her survival under Nazis control in her diary: Anne Frank-The Diary of a Young Girl.
What is the best way to respond to conflict? There are many different ways, there are a lot of good ways to respond to conflict, and some bad ways too. Our response to conflict can say a lot about us. It is very important that we react to conflict appropriately. People can best respond to conflict by having mindfulness, or controlling your emotions, and always having a positive attitude.