Analysis Of Victor Frankenstein's Mistakes: Paid In Blood

1350 Words3 Pages

Victor Frankenstein’s Mistakes: Paid in Blood What people do privately, when they are acting alone, can and will effect others’ lives in ways they do not expect. The effects may very well not be their intended purpose, but innocents always suffer from others’ actions. This is most clearly defined in Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein. Victor, by keeping his sins to himself, destroyed the lives of those he loved; by keeping quiet time and time again, he sealed the fate of his and their horrible endings. Victor obviously had an ambition beyond himself which led him to ignore his well-being: “Every night I was oppressed by a slow fever, and I became nervous to a most painful degree” (Shelley 35). Why would Victor continue making the Creature if it ailed him thus? (The project took him nine months for him to complete.) Creating a life was definitely something greater than Victor. What was his reason …show more content…

“Pride goeth before destruction, and a haughty spirit before a fall” (King James Proverbs 16:18), and fall he did. After the Creature found him and killed his youngest brother and framed his house servant, Justine, for the murder, Victor kept silent. He let Justine die when he could have tried to save her. His thought process was along the lines of, “They will only call me crazy and execute her anyway,” so he did not try. Really, he only did not want to risk his pride by telling of his crime of creating and abandoning a life. In contrast with the book, in the 1931 Frankenstein movie, Henry (Victor) seemed to blindly love the creature he made, and always gave him the benefit of the doubt. His love was too much, one might say (because none one is beyond the capability of evil, no matter how benevolent in our beginning. Every murderer and psychopath was once an innocent child.) However, there is a medium I’m sure Victor should have attempted to

Open Document