Analysis Of Sandra Steingraber's My Children: The Food Experiment

713 Words2 Pages

Sandra Steingraber wrote the essay titled, “My Children: The Food Experiment” about her experience as a mother of two children who have never been exposed to any type of advertisements or propaganda regarding commercialized food products. Steingraber and her family moved to a cabin in the woods near Ithaca, New York and when the family arrived at their new home the discovered their television had been stolen. They decided not to replace the television, which did not seem like a conscious decision to not expose their children to advertisement as much as it related to it not being a central part of their current life or lack of finances to replace it. Not replacing the television provided a context clue that this experiment was not planned, …show more content…

The first discovery was a community-supported organic farm nearby they could join and pick fresh produce. Second, they were able to join a cooperative grocery store that offered a variety of organic items. Lastly, if Jeff worked a couple hours a week at the coop grocery store they received a discount which helped with the cost and prevented them from having to shop elsewhere for other household items. Steingraber’s experiment went on for five years and neither of their children have been exposed to advertising. That includes not only advertising on television but in grocery stores as well, which are often aimed, positioned, and marketed to small …show more content…

I believe the inductive argument made by Steingraber used empirical reasoning based on the evidence presented. Realizing children’s minds can be affected in either a positive or negative way by media advertising was her original hypothesis. As time passed, Steingraber tweaked her initial hypothesis when different variables came into play, such as eating fast food at McDonalds and her children starting school. This self-corrective process efficiently showed her empirical reasoning was based on measurable manifestations. She understood that advertising was merely one method which could influence children’s decisions on what they like and don’t like, but also realized other factors were involved that would have just as much influence. Each time a different variable was introduced to her children, their hypothesis was verified; for example, when the children hated the food from McDonalds. The experiment is open for independent verification because it was and could be repeated again and again in different scenarios; however, it could be critiqued as very rare that children will respond in this manner due to having only two test

Open Document