Analysis Of And The Mountains Echoed

1075 Words3 Pages

The text I have read, “And the Mountains Echoed”, is written by Khaled Hosseini. This text spans several generations, crossing different continents, from Afghanistan to the West. The foundation of the text is the relationship between two siblings, Abdullah and Pari. The text explores the ramifications of their father’s desperate decision to sell Pari to the rich Wahdati family. It follows a non-linear, fragmented narrative, and is told from the different perspectives of the many different characters in the novel.
Reading this text, I felt uncomfortable. This is due to the chararacters’ moral complexity, which challenged my beliefs about the nature of human morals. The author chose to write about characters which are all morally complex with varying degrees of moral ambiguity. It seems to me that all his characters find themselves morally compromised at one point. For example, Saboor, Abdullah’s and Pari’s father, is a complex character who I could not stop thinking of. Saboor sold his only daughter, Pari, to the rich Wahdati family to get some extra money. My first thought, naturally, was that Saboor’s action is rather cruel and cowardly. I could not imagine why a father would sell his only daughter for some extra cash. However, as the story unfolds, I begin to realize the actual sacrifice Saboor has made – He has given up his only daughter so that she can break free from poverty and lead a better life. His sacrifice allowed his whole family to survive. As Saboor has told his son, Abdullah, “A finger had to be cut, to save the hand”. This quote significantly helped me to sympathise and feel pity for Saboor. It made me understand the guilt he has taken upon himself by sacrificing his child. I believe that Saboor has had to make a ...

... middle of paper ...

...re we are mature enough to appreciate the fact that the characters are not just black and white. Thus, Khaled Hosseini’s “And the Mountains Echoed” is a suitable text for our age, as it challenges readers to appreciate the complexity of human morals. As I read the text, I was able to engage with this particular challenge, even though I was not in my comfort zone. By the end of the text, I can better appreciate how the complexity of human morals cannot be understood. People are all morally complicated. We all have intricate layers and twists within us, as well as underlying motives and intentions we mask under our deeds. No one in the world is as noble, or as cruel as they are made out to be; everyone in our society is a mixture of both positive and negative tendencies. These are the lessons that the text have taught me, and will continue to teach all its readers.

Open Document