A Pale View Of Hills And Never Let Me Go Analysis

2722 Words6 Pages

In this essay I am going to consider Spivak’s theory and perspectives of the subaltern in terms of Kazuo Ishiguro’s two novels A Pale View of Hills and Never Let Me Go. I will be considering Spivak’s theories of “post-colonialism”, “essentialism” as well as revising her essay on “Can the Subaltern Speak?” I will be focusing on defining the subaltern characters and their role in Ishiguro’s novel and how they deal with their status as subaltern or whether they are even aware of this constraint that they are faced with. As well as considering the narrative power that Ishiguro has given them in his novels simply by giving them a “voice”. A further aspect to be considered in this essay is the role of memory and trauma in the creation of the subalterns …show more content…

This means that they are immediately oppressed by society simply because of the fact that they are not seen as humans and can therefore only be seen as less than humans. In this novel Kathy H is our narrator and she like Etsuko is telling us her memoirs, which instantly makes her an unreliable narrator. Kathy is also a female narrator and is therefore faced with the same gender based discrimination as well as been viewed as a clone; both of these defining unchanging essentialist characteristics are what make Kathy fall into the group of the subaltern. In the novel the most standout situation in which you can truly see their subaltern status is when Madame comes to visit Hailsham to collect the children’s art for the infamous “gallery”, during her visit Kathy H notices the way that Madame looks at them disapprovingly and how her skin “crawls” with the thought of having one of the children touch her (novel). In the film the most prominent example for me is how ‘rough’ they are with the donors during their operations and in the case of Ruth’s final donation we witness how the doctors do nothing to try and revive Ruth and simply declare her dead leaving her on the table alone to bleed out and uncovered …show more content…

However in Spivak’s essay she critics this process and we see this in the title, “white men are saving brown women from brown men”, that she gives her work. This title can take on many meanings but in my personal interpretation this title is reinforcing the idea that the subaltern has come to depend on others to speak for them. Spivak points out the fact that there is dependency upon those western intellects to speak for the subaltern conditions rather than allowing them to speak for themselves. Therefore we have to be critical of the stories that we are told about the subaltern when they are not been told directly by the subaltern and this is because of the creation of subjectivity that Spivak

Open Document