A Comparison Of The Book Divergent And The Hobbit

1117 Words3 Pages

When I started reading Divergent by Veronica Roth, I noticed how in some ways it was very similar to the Hobbit by J.R.R. Tolkien. I realized that for both of the main characters in these books, they never would have gotten to where they are if they hadn’t been willing to take risks. In order to experience new things, you must be willing to come out of your comfort zone. I think that if Tris was afraid to leave Abnegation and disappoint her family, she never would have realized her full potential. And I think that if Bilbo in the Hobbit never agreed to go on the quest with the dwarves he wouldn’t have discovered all the talents he never knew he had. Another theme that I found in both books was that sometimes people’s greed for power and victory, can blind them to the rights and needs of others. I realized that the people in the government wanted full control over people and their thoughts so they come up with ways to take full control of them. I think that they were obsessed with having full …show more content…

In Divergent I realized that their society is extremely flawed. I was surprised that the only reason the government wants to get rid of Divergents is because they cannot be controlled and a successful society should not be based on getting rid of people who are different. Something that also helped me to realize that this was a flawed society was when Peter stabbed Edward in the eye and did not get in trouble. I think that it is extremely unfair for Peter to get ranked to first place after hurting someone and Edward who is the innocent victim had to become factionless and live in the lowest level of poverty for the rest of his life. Sometimes others obsession for perfection can make a society worse than it was to begin with. Because the government in Divergent wanted a perfect society so bad, I realized that the tried so hard that it became almost torture for other

Open Document