Science university researchers which examined the trail approval process for 12 separate antidepressants submitted to the FDA (Turner, 2008). They found that only 3/36 trails with negative findings were published compared to 37/38 of positive trails. Publishing negative findings is essential to interpret the overall significance of field of research and this issue needs to be resolved. There are numerous concerns with Publication bias. Research is becoming less innovative and its neutrality is decreasing
How Practitioners Can Use Academic Work in their Areas of Expertise Research is an essential component of many academic programs, from undergraduate to doctoral degrees. The widespread incorporation of research courses into numerous academic programs at all levels is testament to the essentiality of research skills and the subsequent benefits of becoming an effective researcher. It is true that if research was not a requirement and a critical part of higher education learning, there would be a high
differently depending on their discourse community. In most academic disciplines the difference
Assessment 1 The aim of this text is to critical review two academic papers related to the emotion labour. One is "Being Somebody Else: Emotional Labour and Emotional Dissonance in the Context of the Service Experience at a Heritage Tourism Site" by Dijk and Kirk (2007), which is discusses about if emotion labour causes negative job outcome. Another paper is the writing of Karatepe, Yorganci and Haktanir (2008) named "Outcomes of customer verbal aggression among hotel employees". It mainly focuses
Communication Issues for Researchers A scientific researcher faces many obstacles while trying to conduct a research project. The researcher’s inability to communicate clearly what he or she is trying to do can result in difficulties throughout the process. Grant applications to fund projects and scientific papers to document results are often as important as the work itself. Besides standard written documentation and applications, a researcher will develop oral presentations for various stakeholders
good and bad so they will correct the mistakes and tell you what needs improvement. Another advantage is the reviewer can find out whether the scientific journal or report has been plagiarized and remove which will save money and time instead of publishing it. Also peer review allows the reviewer/ reader to repeat the exact experiments and used the exact same results that they obtained and compare to what they got to see how similar and accurate the result which makes it more reliable to use. Lastly
Reflection usually means reflecting on an experience usually a bad experience that requires the practitioner to stop and evaluate the best way forward. Leeson (2010) suggests practitioners to 'feel' their work as opposed to just observing. This can challenge practice and knowledge and hopefully give greater understanding. However, reflection requires the practitioner to question their own professional practice and as such this self knowledge is not an easy option. As Crowley (2009:4) states practitioner
There are many reasons I have used health care services at different times in my lifetime from birth to the present time. I have utilized pregnancy healthcare services. I have used health care services for preventive care such as a yearly Pap smear or health physicals. My friends, family and my co-workers may use health care services for the same reasons as mine, especially if they are of the same gender. The peer-reviewed article that I chose was about heart disease. Heart disease needs particular
The Benefits of Revealing Secrets Over the past fifteen years, researchers have acknowledged that the revealing of personal secrets through talking and writing can lead to a variety of health benefits, in view of the fact that the opportunity allows the secret holder to openly express the clandestine information with another. This prospect not only allows the individual the opportunity to relieve themselves of the pressure of the emotional burden, but also the chance to come to terms with the
2. INTRODUCTION Performing a literature review is like an art. It is a precursor in the introduction of a research paper. A literature review can be defined as a critical and in depth evaluation of previous research. It is a summary of a particular area of research allowing anybody reading the paper to establish why pursuing the research program. The purpose of a literature review is to help in explaining how the question to be investigated fits in and the reason why the researcher has approached
Project’s findings. (As quoted by Badke, para. 1) Even if the public likes it, though, for the most part academic circles do not. Many professors will not allow their students to use Wikipedia. These professors think Wikipedia is trivial, untrustworthy, insulting, and too often completely incorrect. (2008, para. 4) Could this be because the university world is jealous? It is true that true academics are the experts and if a layperson wants the facts, they are the best resource. However, because of
I am writing to strongly recommend Tiffany Richards, who is a Graduate Student in the Program of Neuroscience at Stony Brook University, for the Congressional Black Caucus (CBC) Spouses Education Scholarship. Tiffany has worked in my lab since Summer 2016 and she is undoubtedly one of the most intelligent and hardworking Master students I have witnessed at our University. My laboratory studies the behavioral, electrophysiological and neuroanatomical aspects of spinal cord injury – with the overall
Assignment 8 Introduction Researchers are to develop a research methodology and design for their envisioned dissertation topic. Therefore, it is essential that the research problem statement, purpose statement, and the research questions align with the research topic. The purpose of this paper is to propose and justify a research method and design. Research Topic Previous researchers have estimated that one in ten elderly individuals will experience sexual, physical, and psychological abuse,
Scholarly Journal are important because they provide experts within a certain fields a forum to communicate current research and further an area of academic knowledge, they often uses a rigorous process called peer review. Peer review is a process by which academic research and study is subjected to review by a group of other scholars or researcher in that field. Authors submit manuscripts to the journal, which may be forwarded to the group of scholars or experts in that field who will review the
The research process is a series of phases that helps enable a researcher to go from asking a question, to formulating an answer. This essay will outline the five phases of the quantitative research process, and provide an example for each of these phases based a research article written by authors: S. Odencrants, M. Ehnfors and A. Ehrenberg on the topic of malnutrition in coronary obstructive pulmonary disorder (COPD) inpatients. This essay will conclude with an example of how COPD patient care
The literature reviews seeks to explore the prevailing discourses surrounding the topic of older offenders. We will begin with a brief overview on how previous literature has defined the notion of an older offender. Secondly, we will explore the historical context related to the increase of offender populations by taking into account multiple perspectives surrounding the issue. In fact, it becomes essential to create a starting point for action and that it is making individual’s aware of the current
to obscure questions. I have always had the privilege of erudite teachers during school and college years that have played a vital role in laying the foundation of my education. I ascribe my good understanding of the subjects and the interest in academics to them that has come
The following compilation of sources were all gathered with certain criteria in mind, to inform on background information, give valid reasoning to back up my view on the issue. In addition to displaying a plan for moving forward in the future. While keeping these important criteria in mind, I discovered each one of the following carefully selected sources fit into one of the before mentioned categories. Additionally, helping to strengthen an over-all argument. Another important thing I looked for
When choosing sources for a research topic, the most important factor of a quality source is depth and reliability. That is the key to a strong, well-written, argument. Many times, one can find themselves fishing through an array of sources, not knowing which ones to use. A student may find a passage in a book or article that perfectly fits the idea of their research, and they think they have struck gold. They sit down, ready to write their masterpiece. They come to that point in their paper
Data Manupulation: Case 1 According to Public Health Service a unit of the U.S. department of Health and Human Services (HHS), ‘’Research misconduct is defined as fabrication, or plagiarism in proposing, performing, or reviewing research, or in reporting research reports. OSTP states that “The research record is the record of data or results that embody the facts resulting from scientific inquiry, and includes, but is not limited to, research proposals, laboratory records, both physical and electronic