Things to Consider for Performance evaluation

1440 Words3 Pages

An engineer, for a manufacturing company, is approaching the time for an annual review to be performed. The previous review suggested a poor rating based on the current evaluation criteria. While the engineer is a bright hard worker, there appear to be personality conflicts that resulted in an unfavorable previous review. These conflicts include practical jokes towards the engineer and lack of respect from the plant manager.

The engineer has proven that suggested changes can result in savings on energy costs and eliminate safety hazards. Personality conflicts and acting standoffish result in a medium rating. Arrogance with managers for not paying attention and have a poor attitude with coworkers gives a low-medium rating. Workspace cleanliness due to papers and memos stacked on the desk gives a low-medium rating. By focusing on the current criteria the engineer is being denied a fair and honest review since it is not looking at all the information available.

The current evaluation has review items of friendliness, neatness, and attitude. The criteria may be useful in another style of business, such as a service sector worker, but is unfair to the review of all the employees in a manufacturing facility. If a change is made to use the three most commonly used criteria, the review would focus on traits, behavior, and ability and knowledge it would create a more even approach to reviewing performance of the engineer and all other staff.

Changing to common criteria for evaluation will allow for a better chance of all people to receive a fair review. Traits look at the personal characteristics of the employee that “can include work ethic, tact when dealing with others, concern for team members, ambition, enthusiasm or creativity.” (...

... middle of paper ...

...tioned can have an influence on the engineer that were not presented and would also need to be reviewed to see why the previous review was poor.

Works Cited

Performance evaluation methods. (n.d.). Accessed on Mar. 5, 2014 from http://www.buzzle.com/articles/performance-evaluation-methods.html

Joy, K. (n.d.). Common criteria in evaluation. Retrieved from http://www.ehow.com/info_8177151_common-criteria-evaluation.html

Lauby, S. (2013, August 13). Overcoming 5 common performance appraisal biases. Accessed on Mar. 5, 2014 from http://www.hrbartender.com/2013/training/overcoming-5-common-performance-appraisal-biases/

Vanek, C. (2013, April 23). Guide to 360 reviews – what is a 360? how do you administer 360 feedback?. Accessed on Mar. 5, 2014 from http://www.surveygizmo.com/survey-blog/guide-to-360-reviews-what-is-a-360-how-do-you-administer-360-feedback/

More about Things to Consider for Performance evaluation

Open Document