Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Essays on paying athletes in college
Why student athletes should not be paid
Why shouldn't college athletes get paid
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Essays on paying athletes in college
Should Athletes Be Paid
At some colleges their athletes are a key source of income for the university. This would lead one to believe that the athletes who produce money should get a portion of that money in return. Despite the fact that paying college athletes is banned some of them still get paid anyway. The overall good to be gained from paying the college athletes could be that they would want to stay in school longer and develop an education rather than going to the pros prematurely. One would think that knowing all of this the athletes should at least get paid a small amount of the money they bring to the school.
There are countless examples of athletes getting paid despite it being banned. This occurrence can not only hurt the player but it can also hurt the school. A very famous example of this is the case with NBA star and former University of Southern California (USC) guard O.J Mayo. Mayo received many benefits while playing basketball at Southern California. Some of these benefits include lots of money, new clothing, and also a flat screen television. When finding out about all this Coach Tim Floyd denied breaking any rules and later resigned from coaching at the school. His attorney Jim Darnell also said on behalf of Floyd “We don’t believe that Coach Floyd did anything improper with regard to O.J Mayo.” As a result of this event USC basketball received heavy sanctions. These sanctions include a ban on postseason competition at the end of the following season, a reduction of multiple scholarships and the NCAA vacating all of the Trojans’ wins from the 2007-2008 season, the season that Mayo played for them. Furthermore the reputation of the player and school were both damaged because of this small incident. http://arti...
... middle of paper ...
...ate.edu/node/660>.
Daugherty, Paul. "College athletes already have advantages and shouldn't be paid." - Paul Daugherty. N.p., n.d. Web. 4 May 2014. .
Goessling, Ben. "Adrian Peterson backs pay for play." ESPN. ESPN Internet Ventures, 11 Apr. 2014. Web. 5 May 2014. .
Greenhouse, Steven. "Union Effort at Northwestern May Not Mean Much for Public Colleges." The New York Times. The New York Times, 26 Apr. 2014. Web. 4 May 2014. .
"should ncca athletes be paid." US News. U.S.News & World Report, n.d. Web. 5 May 2014.
To pay or not to pay college athletes, that is the question. It seems like it would be a simple yes or no answer, but there are many underlying factors as to why paying athletes would be a negative. All universities vary in size and popularity, so how would it be possible to pay all athletes the same amount? Student is the leading word in the term “student-athlete”. They are not considered employees, which is what paying athletes would make them. While universities are making some profit off of the abilities of their athletes, college athletes make the personal choice to play a sport. Due to the differing popularity and size of universities and their athletic programs, there would be no fair way to pay all athletes. In addition, many athletes already receive compensation in the form of publicity, scholarships, and access to a high education, and therefore the NCAA and universities should not pay athletes.
Hartnett, Tyson. "Why College Athletes Should be Paid." The Huffington Post. TheHuffingtonPost.com, 21 Oct. 2013. Web. 15 May 2014. .
Salvador, Damon. “Why College Athletes Should Not Be Paid?” 20 April 2013.Web. 18 May 2014.
In “College Athletes Should Not Be Paid,” a response to the previous argument that also appeared in the Baltimore Sun, former Penn State football player Warren Hartenstine argues that “College Athletes Should Not Be Paid.” Like Marx, Hartenstine is writing to a similar audience, but argues why student-athletes shouldn’t be paid above scholarships like professional athletes are.
Johnson, Dennis A., and John Acquaviva. "Point/counterpoint: Paying College Athletes."The Sport Journal 15.1 (2012). Questia School. Web. 3 Feb. 2014.
Today there are over 450,000 college athletes and the National College Athletics Association (NCAA) faces a difficult decision on whether or not college athletes should be paid. Many people believe that they should and many believe they should not. There are several benefits that college’s athletes receive for being a student athlete. Why should they receive even more benefits than their scholarship and numerous perks?
Thomas, Brennan. "Pay for Play: Should College Athletes Be Compensated?." Bleacher Report. TBS, 4 Apr. 2011. Web. 8 Dec. 2013.
The debate on whether college athletes should be paid to play is a sensitive controversy, with strong support on both sides. College athletics have been around for a long time and always been worth a good amount of money. This billion dollar industry continues to grow in popularity and net worth, while they continue to see more and more money come in. The student-athletes who they are making the money off of see absolutely none of this income. It is time that the student-athletes start to see some of this income he or she may by helping bring the National Collegiate Athletic Association. There are many people who do not think this is in the best interest of the student-athletes or Universities, but that being said there are also many people who are in favor of the change.
One of the strongest arguments against student athletes getting paid is that many people feel they already are getting paid, through their financial aid package. Sports Illustrated author, Seth Davis, states in his article “Hoop Thoughts”, that “student athletes are already being payed by earning a free tuition. Which over the course of four years can exceed $200,000, depending on the school they attend. They are also provided with housing, textbooks, food and academic tutoring. When they travel to road games, they are given per diems for meals. They also get coaching, training, game experience and media exposure in their respective crafts” (Davis, 2011). This is a considerable amount of income. While the majority of regular students are walking out of school with a sizeable amount of debt, most student athletes are debt free. Plus they get to enjoy other benefits that are not made available to the average student. They get to travel with their teams, t...
Eitzen, D. Stanley. "College Athletes Should Be Paid." Sports and Athletes. Ed. James D. Torr.
...wever, the NCAA should alter its rules to allow for stipends for college athletes to allow them to have some spending cash. Other than that, college athletes should not be paid.
Lewis, Michael, and Bob Williams. "SHOULD COLLEGE FOOTBALL PLAYERS BE PAID?" New York Times Upfront Nov 17 2008: 22. ProQuest. Web. 25 Nov. 2013.
Block, Molly. "College athletes should not receive payment for playing." The University Star: n. pag. Print.
College athletes are not paid, yet they generate a great deal of money for the school, which is unfair. College athletes have to spend less time on their school work. Schools take advantage of them to make money. Colleges don’t care what the athlete does outside of sports. Many of them earn meaningless degrees because most of their time is spent on sports instead of school. The time spent on sports is more than the time spent on their school work. Playing sports in college is like a full time job. They spend a huge amount of their time training: lifting weights and watching their diets. It is unfair that college athletes are not getting paid because they spend most of their time on sports, they risk injury, and they have high dropout rates due to frustration.
Mitchel, Horace and Marc Eldelman. Should College Student- Athletes be Paid? 6 January 2014. 6 April 2014 .