Sexual Intimacies Between Psychologists and Their Former Clients: An Article Review

1946 Words4 Pages

The purpose of this article “was to add qualitative data to the sparsely researched issue of psychotherapists’ sexual contact with adult patients begun after the termination of treatment”
(Shavit & Bucky, 2004, p. 231). This was completed via semi-structured interviews, which helped the authors analyze the opinions of psychologists regarding this topic. This study aimed to answer the following questions in regards to sexual contact between therapists and their previous clients: 1.) was sexual involvement with former patients viewed as ethical?, 2.) did sexual involvement with former patients potentially harm the patient?, 3.) was there a professional responsibility to be upheld by therapist post-treatment?, and 4.) should Standard
4.07 of the APA Ethics Code (1992) be re-written to prohibit any sexual involvement between a therapist and their former clients (Shavit & Bucky, 2004)? In this article, the authors studied post-termination sexual involvement, Standard 4.07 of the APA Ethics Code (1992), psychoanalytic therapy, impact on the client as a result of sexual contact with therapist, transference, countertransference, two-year waiting period post treatment, nature and length of treatment, and ethical standards (Shavit & Bucky, 2004). The effects of these variables on each other were examined in order to gather a consensus of psychologist’s opinions regarding sexual contact with former patients. In regards to the author’s hypotheses, Shavit and Bucky (2004) did not generate any hypotheses in this study; as this study aimed to elicit the participant’s opinions regarding sexual contact between psychologists and their former patients. The authors also aimed to determine whether or not the results of this study co...

... middle of paper ...

... and their former clients. However, the finding that potential harm could occur when post-termination sexual interactions develop, suggests therapists are aware of the detrimental effects this act could have on clients. In addition, the lack of consensus on this topic suggests more research is needed, in order to determine practitioners views on this topic, as well as to determine whether or not Standard 4.07 of the APA Ethics
Code (1992) is too liberal or too harsh. Lastly, the results of further research will help determine whether or not the two-year waiting period to engage in sexual contact with former clients is necessary. Works Cited

Shavit, N., & Bucky, S. (2004). Sexual contact between psychologists and their former therapy patients: Psychoanalytic perspectives and professional implications. The American
Journal of Psychoanalysis, 64, 229-248.

More about Sexual Intimacies Between Psychologists and Their Former Clients: An Article Review

Open Document