Defying Ethics

754 Words2 Pages

Stanley Milgram was a Yale psychologist that organized diverse studies during his career. In 1961, at the age of twenty-seven he conducted his most controversial study on obedience. In light of the recent Holocaust, Milgram wanted to comprehend how twelve million people were put to death simply by the orders from their commanders. The original accepted explanation was the popular notion of the authoritarian personality, but Milgram suspected the explanation to be too confined. He supposed the explanation to harmful obedience was not in the strength of personality but to a greater extent in the strength of the situation. Any influential circumstance could cause any normal person to disregard moral convictions and on command perform brutality. To evaluate his hypothesis, he organized a phony, but convincingly real shock machine, then ordered the volunteers to administer fake levels of electrical shock to actors who played along (Slater 32). The writer supports the controversy, but believes the study was ethical because it influenced the development of internal standards to regulate methods in research within psychology, produced inflicted insight experienced by participants, and it was vital for defeating the possible legitimacy risk associated with the studies of cognizant participants. Deceit is the action or practice of deceiving someone by concealing or misleading the truth. Deception has always been a part of psychology and researchers have always determined that in the majority of cases the deceptions are harmless or minimal, yet they still exist. As a result of Mailgram’s experiment, deceptive research operations are now under harsh examination all across the discipline. It is obvious that Milgram’s intent was not to revol... ... middle of paper ... ...obert J.. Ethics and regulation of clinical research. 2nd ed. Baltimore: Urban & Schwarzenberg, 1986. Print. Russell, Nestar John Charles. "Milgram's Obedience To Authority Experiments: Origins And Early Evolution." British Journal Of Social Psychology 50.1 (2011): 140-162. Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection. Web. 12 May 2014. Russell, Nestar J. C., and Robert J. Gregory. "Spinning An Organizational “Web Of Obligation”? Moral Choice In Stanley Milgram’S “Obedience” Experiments." American Review Of Public Administration 41.5 (2011): 495-518. Business Source Complete. Web. 12 May 2014. Slater, Lauren. Opening Skinner's box: Great Psychological Experiments of the Twentieth Century. New York: W.W. Norton, 2004. Print. Weiten, Wayne. Psychology Applied to Modern Life: Adjustment in the 21st Century. 9th ed. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Cengage Learning, 2009. Print.

Open Document