Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The importance of Internet censorship
The influences of freedom of speech
Positive impacts of freedom of speech
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The importance of Internet censorship
Annotated Bibliography
Lemley, Mark, David S. Levine, and David G. Post. "Don't break the Internet."Stanford Law Review Online 64 (2011): 34. 25 Feb. 2014
Mark Lemley is the William H. Neukom Professor of Law at Stanford Law School, the Director of the Stanford Program in Law, Science and Technology and is also the director of Stanford’s LLM Program in Law, Science, and Technology. Lemley has also authored seven books and 133 articles. David S. Levine the second author listed among this article is an associate Professor of Law at Elon University School of Law, and an Affiliate at the center for internet and society at Stanford Law School. David G. Post the third author of the article teaches intellectual property law and the law of cyberspace at Temple University. All three esteemed and respected in their field of study have combined their efforts to make an article that outlines the dangers of internet censorship laws like SOPA which stand for Stop Online Piracy Act, and PIPA or Protect IP act of 2011 which stands for Preventing Real Online Threats to Economic Creativity and Theft of Intellectual Property Act. Both act look to attack the internet’s technical infrastructure for those who infringe on copyrighted and trademark material. The roots of this act looks to treat those who use the internet as a criminal making user guilty until proven innocent, this type of policing would be a great detriment to the ability to share with sites such as Facebook, YouTube, Twitter, and Tumblr to name a few. Under SOPA, IP rights holders can proceed vigilante-style against allegedly offending sites, without any court hearing or any judicial intervention or oversight whatsoever giving the copyrighted companies unrestricted policing power again...
... middle of paper ...
...t-break-internet>.
Sanchez, Julian. CISPA Is Dead. Now Let’s Do a Cybersecurity Bill Right. 26 April 2013. Journal Article. 25 Feburary 2014. .
Segal, Julian Sanchez and David. Blackout Protesting SOPA, PIPA Bills Makes Statement on Censorship. 19 Novemeber 2012. Journal Article. 25 Feburary 2014. .
Shirky, Clay. The political power of social media: technology, the public sphere, and political change. Feburary 2011. Journal Article. 25 Feburary 2014. .
The purpose of this article is to persuade the reader that social media is the new alternative to mainstream big money ads for politicians. Cary’s intended audience is politicians, political campaign managers and politically engaged citizens. The tone of this article is informative but slightly opinionated. While Cary does back up her claims with notable quotes and statistics the main support for her argument is her professional opinion. Cary was formerly the
In Nicholas Carr’s article “How Social Media Is Ruining Politics”, Carr writes about the effects that social media has on politics. In his article, Carr focuses more on the negative effect that social media has when it comes to politics. Some points that he makes about social media include specific examples like the recent presidential campaigns, how other technological advances over the years have effected politics, and the effectiveness that social media has on politics
The relationship between censorship, free speech and copyright in this bill is worth discussing. In SOPA, copyrights are enforced by censorship, but censorship at the same time violates free speech. Although SOPA’s online censorship of unauthorized online material is an effective method to protect internet copyrights, it resists innovation and compromises freedom of speech. SOPA aroused public attention from a wide range of protests, though it originally aimed to help online businesses damaged by piracy. On January 18, 2012, websites like Google, Reddit, and Wikipedia were all blackout and drew great public attention.
Witherbee, Amy and Cushman, C. Ames. "Counterpoint: Sometimes Censorship is Necessary." 2011. Points of View Reference Center. Web. 21 March 2012.
One of the properties that allow social media to be an attractive tool to use by politicians is the ability to attract a massive audience of users. The Pew Research Center suggests that there is a growing number of social media users. A whooping 73% of US adults use the internet (Social Networking Fact Sheet). These...
Key Internet Cases (2002) Significant Internet Jurisdiction Cases. Online at http://www.unc.edu Referecned on November 22nd, 2004
Providing real world examples, such as the corrupt impeachment trial of Philippine President Joseph Estrada, Shirky focuses his attention on the potential for media connections to influence activism through rapid communication lines where he infers social media has become a "coordination tool for nearly all of the world's political movements". His article depicts how the communication landscape is becoming more participatory where greater access to information and more opportunities for free speech means an augmented capacity to initiate international change. His research also includes the interrelated effects of the "topology of social and technological networks" as well as the cultural aspects of such effects. Such a focus on social media in regards to power makes this a highly appropriate source for academic
Abstract: This paper examines the use of Internet technologies (specifically SafeWeb.com) to counteract invasions of personal privacy and censorship. The paper begins by exploring the methods by which governments, corporations, and commercial agents invade personal privacy. It also discusses Internet censorship on the corporate and governmental levels. It then proceeds to discuss SafeWeb.com, a technology that allows Internet users to surf the Web privately and view censored content. The paper finishes by exploring some of the ethical issues raised by Internet privacy and censorship in specific relation to SafeWeb, concluding that the application of SafeWeb in circumventing the authority of governments and corporations is inherently unethical.
As the Internet has become more widely recognized and used by people all over the world, it has brought a new medium in which information can very easily be broadcast to everyone with access to it. In 1995 there was a projected 26 million Internet users, which has grown to almost 300 million today. One major problem with this is that everyone represents different countries and provinces which have different outtakes on certain types of freedom of speech as well as different laws about it. This proposes a new type of law that would need to be written in order to determine whether or not something is illegal on the Internet. A person in one country can express what they want to, but that expression may be illegal in another country and in this situation whose laws are to be followed? What I propose to do accomplish in this paper is to discuss the freedom of speech laws of the United States of America and those of France, China, and Canada. I will examine what about them is similar and what about them is different. The bringing of the Internet has brought many new types of businesses as well as ways in order to communicate with the world, but as with each new endeavor or invention, there needs to be a way in order to govern its use and policies. There must also be ways in order to punish those not following the new laws and policies of use, since that the country that the person is in may allow what they did, but it may not be allowed on the Internet or in a different country. In other words, there is the need for international laws governing the Internet.
The internet has been one of the most influential technological advancements of the twenty-first century. It is in millions of homes, schools, and workplaces. The internet offers not only a way of communicating with people around the world, but also a link to information, shopping, chatting, searching, and maps. This freedom to be anyone and to "go" anywhere right from the comfort of home has become a cherished item. However, there is always a down side to every up. Because of the freedom to post anything and access anything on the internet, the issue of regulation has arisen; for example, what should and should not be allowed on the internet? Who has the right to regulate this space that we cherish for its freedom?
In recent years, many possible plans to enact government regulation to improve cybersecurity have been suggested. Most recently, in 2017, then U.S. president Barack Obama implemented the Cybersecurity National Action Plan (CNAP). The plan would have invested $19 billion in cybersecurity by gathering experts to make recommendations in regards to cyber security, help secure the government IT group, and encourage more advanced security measures (Daniel 1). However, while CNAP does present a way to solve the problem, it just adds another program that attempts to enhance cybersecurity: “It is the multiplicity of programs and division of responsibility that diminishes their effectiveness. At least eleven federal agencies bear significant responsibility for cybersecurity” (Cohen 1). Every so often, another cybersecurity program will be established, but former plans are seldom removed. This leads to a large amount of departments to share responsibility, which creates general confusion and limits each department’s power. Furthermore, widespread government regulation may weaken cybersecurity. Many fear that any regulation would not be flexible enough and would instead allow easier hacking (Ridge 3). If every system in the entire nation had the same security measures, it would be much easier to break into as by breaking into one system, a hacker a could break into everything.
One of the most recent examples of ethics and technology conflicts in the United States are privacy issues and how we cite, distribute and publish intellectual property on the internet. For instance, many corporations and people take advantage of the open access of the internet and the lack of legislation governing the right to post and upload information to the internet. Today, nearly every household in the United States has a computer with int...
The future of the United States government, policy structure, and elections will evolve around the emerging social media. How well politicians and government officials use the technology could shape the policies of our country.
Shirky, C. (Producer). (June, 2009). Recorded at TED@ State. Clay Shirky: How social media can make history. Podcast retrieved from http://www.ted.com/talks/clay_shirky_how_cellphones_twitter_facebook_can_make_history.html
ethical and legal woes on the internet, copy write infringements, and the right to privacy, the