Relativity In Anthropology

1101 Words3 Pages

Clifford Geertz once said: “Cultural analysis is intrinsically incomplete. And, worse than that, the more deeply it goes the less complete it is.” I recently spent a short amount of time at a busy 5-way traffic circle near my residence. While sitting in one spot for about 25 minutes, I observed many people doing many different things (mainly driving). Observing the various people made me think of what their particular cultures may have been, and from there, I began thinking of culture in and of itself. What is culture? Culture is defined as: Ideas and behaviors that are learned and transmitted. Nongenetic means of adaptation (Park, 2008). Culture plays a vital role in anthropology. After all, anthropology is the holistic, scientific …show more content…

I began to analyze the patterns I saw using some of the anthropological concepts. First, I considered relativism. It would be easy for me to approach some of the young adults (using moral relativity) and inform them of the image they are presenting to the world, but cultural relativity means to study another culture from its point of view without imposing our own cultural views (Park, 2008). There was nothing happening that could have endangered the lives of anyone around these young adults, so I did not feel compelled to step in. Also, I completely understand their point of view. Next, I contemplated holism. Holism is: looking at all aspects of a culture and their interrelationships (Park, 2008). This one was very difficult for me. The people are just parts of a bigger system (their culture), and without knowing their whole background I cannot definitively determine the properties of their given systems. 25 minutes of only observation of an individual part of a system is not nearly enough time to analyze their behavior. One could also analyze my observations using diffusionism which is an outdated concept of cultural evolution that claims major cultural advances were made by one or a few societies and spread from there to all the other societies (Park, 2008). As the subjects of my observations were both American and British citizens, it is possible that cultural advances were made by either the Brits or the Americans, and the other society picked it up from living in close

Open Document