The National Examination Council Of Tanzania

1053 Words3 Pages

As gloomy as it would be, the national form four exam failures went on through 2012, where result stood even worse with 61% of students scoring a division zero on the exam (Twaweza, 2013). Following the catastrophic failure, the government nullified the entire exam result ordering “the National Examination Council of Tanzania (NECTA) to review again the national form four results “using the 2011 grading system. Paying a close attention to the result, it remains clear that the problem was policy change, which was either not properly examined or explained before the implementation. If explored clearly the 2011 and 2012 cohort members as indicated in figure 4, embody students whom the ministry of education claimed that they passed the national exam with the rate of 60% in 2006 compared to how it was in 2002 with 12%. As the consequence, the 2006 cohort members made their way to secondary school under the SEDP and graduated (I would say in the years represented in figure 4 above ) with a lowest result ever (Policy Forum, 2012) representing a few students attaining division one and two. The result reminds policy makers to pay attention to the quality of basic education delivery, focusing on kindergarten and primary school for improving other levels of education.
Policy Implementation
Most so often policy implementation takes different paths in the field depending on the cultural and the organization’s sceneries. Policy implementation in fact denotes the process of taking into action a given task with the intention of producing the best desired result (Paudel, 2009). On a regular basis, policy makers write down procedures guiding the implementation of particular intended policy. The policy implementation approaches, as a rule, focus o...

... middle of paper ...

...icy, understood by all stakeholders. Above that, sharing similar policy vision and implementation can only work, if people possess the vision knowledge. Fortunately, Tanzania explained clearly the need for such requirement long before through the NSGR paper, holding the intent of applying “strategy” which remains properly “understood by all stakeholders for them to actively play their” role. Further than that, the government noted that “several principles are critical during the preparation of the strategy [, and] others will apply during implementation, monitoring and evaluation” (URT, 2005, p. 23). Frankly, what our government need is not new education policy, instead the continuous action for implementing polices already in the papers, evaluate them, learn from implementation errors, improve them, and implement them repeatedly until achieving the expected results.

Open Document