Mobility Systems and Space

1266 Words3 Pages

Serres and Clifford discuss the nature of time, “contact zone” and knowing as a mobile confluence of fluxes. That it conveys the multiplicities of knowing and being, fluxes of time within cultures. Traditionally, science prescribed a static and fixed subject according to Serres. It reproduced a standing system of being, even though it claims as a process of becoming. Serres views that it’s better to paint a sort of fluctuating picture of relations and rapports like showing an admirable network of forks, some of which mix or silt up, while others open up like a cloud of angels that passes. Thus, it’s made to be seen that a new paradigm is being formed within the social sciences in the shape of mobility. Some recent contributions to forming and stabilizing this new paradigm include work from anthropology, cultural studies, geography, migration studies, science and technology studies, tourism studies, and sociology.

Without social studies sciences there is no increase in the fluidity of a far-reaching systems of mobility. Such mobility include wire and cable systems, the distribution of media satellites, the mobile phone staves that enable unseen waves channels to carry mobile phone messages and the massive infrastructures that organize the physical movement of people and goods. Mobility also includes movements of images and information on local, national, and global media. The concept of communication infrastructures such Internet, mobile phone, and mass media effected the increasingly embedded language of computers. Hence, the hybridity of systems that pool technology and society out of those divergent place that are produces and reproduced. Increasingly making air-terminals to become like cities and cities are bec...

... middle of paper ...

...hat this is a global technological moment, yet I am living in an inscribed national space. I feel vulnerable because it seems as if the spaces for disconnection and reconnection have become more dangerous. This space of shadow is absurdly including the issues of citizenship as the frame of belonging. As a legal Alien, I was always and already suspect and the identity of the definition of citizenship in times of crisis to be very restricted and to this unknowingly ignorance of time and the conception of academic pit. This desire that Serres and Clifford both tries to articulate is about interrupting and benefiting those who might be seen as messengers in-between space and that it is an important awareness of insider to learner. They both seem to agree that it has become a space to highlight the cracks of how we are shaped and framed or how we can work against that.

Open Document