Essay On Rational Community

750 Words2 Pages

In his book The Community of Those Who Have Nothing in Common, Alphonso Lingis (1994) discusses community and proposes an untraditional view of community, the “other community”. Traditionally community is known as a social structure in which individuals have something in common. This usually refers to a shared location, shared identity or common values or beliefs. In this traditional view or “rational community” these commonalities are crucial in uniting individuals. This “other community” comes into being when individuals’ lives connect or bump up against one another without necessarily having anything in common. These interactions can arrive inexplicably. It is often difficult to understand these “others” whom we do not share the same qualities of the rational community, although we recognize them as individuals. We may recognize our shared vulnerability, and it supersedes that although our ethical responsibilities have no clear rational command, they nevertheless make demands upon us. Lingis (1994) indicates that “One exposes oneself to the other-the stranger, the destitute one, the judge-not only with one’s insights and one’s ideas, that they may be contested, but one also exposes the nakedness of one’s eyes, one’s voice, and one’s silence, one’s empty hands” (p. 11). This “other community” comes into being when the stranger is exposed, having no common rational discourse with us. This stranger or intruder disrupts or intentions and makes us question our own cultural coding, “arresting one’s own intentions” during their encounter. This face of the other, the stranger serves as an “indicative surface” to us. Lingis (1994) states “The face of another is a surface upon which one senses directions and directives that order me; w... ... middle of paper ... ...ape it. Lingis’s “community in death” is composed of a dying one as well as an accompanying one that is not dying. As indicated previously the “saying” is necessary in this community. This “community in death” emerges from the dying one, which contributes to the reality that they will no longer inhabit this world together with the accompanying one again. There is an obligation in this “other community” to accompany the dying one, without this accompaniment Lingis’s other community would not exist. It is this consciousness of death that incites ones obligation to accompany the dying one. This consciousness of the death of the other guarantees my own life as well as death and links my communicative action to the situation. We know what to do, “accompany” before we know what to say, the “saying”. And this “saying” may not be as important in the end as one might think.

Open Document