Throughout the field of financial management, the national government arranges in motion the knowledge that it must reduce the transfers of assets to local governments. To verify the possible for increased revenue budgets to complement losses in local money, the predictors in revenues of capacity, effort and inconsistency throughout border town counties in Texas were examined. The following research analyses border counties in the state of Texas by investigating total revenues accumulated in the 2012 fiscal year. Even though the notion of decreasing the level of expenditure for local government did not instantly revealed itself, it was later executed over the years. The predictors in revenues for each border county in Texas under the 10,000 population group will be used to determine a complex indicator of the total revenue capacity financial management for the incoming fiscal year. The revenue capacity is the theoretical income an area can increase given its fiscal base. The following counties for this analysis, the Texas Actual Border region include these 14 Texas counties touching the U.S.-Mexico border: Brewster, Cameron, El Paso, Hidalgo, Hudspeth, Jeff Davis, Kinney, Maverick, Presidio, Starr, Terrell, Val Verde, Webb, Zapata this data collected is from The Border: Snapshot from the Comptroller Window of State Government Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts. Mainly as outcome of decreasing federal funding to border cities, metropolises had to find new bases of revenue but increasing their support on current profits sources. In this research design you will find an overview of the sources and amount of each of these bases which make up the revenue of local governments emphasis on the local regimes of the 14 border counties ...
... middle of paper ...
...n Texas border areas that levy all or share of the 2 cents allowable for local sales tax. Tying in each individual county we can determine that the counties with the maximum sales tax revenues per capita typically encompass isolated metropolitan communities that draw the mainstream of sales tax revenue from the area. Then non-residents spend currency in the community, sales tax gatherings are inconsistent to the local population. For instance, if we take a look at the percentage of the county’s population, that generates more than certain revenue from its sales tax. A good source for this proposed statements we can view each individual county and it’s Local Sales Tax Revenue Per Capita under the Texas Transparency website to help us identify the total sales tax collected, total population, median household income and an idea of how much tax per person was collected.
According to the data obtain from the United States Census Bureau; the state of Texas received the amount of $ 24,500,909 in sales tax revenue in the year 2012, Tennessee $6,512,352, and Utah $1,857,055. The sale tax in Texas percentage is “6.25 % to 8.25% depending on the local cities; Tennessee charges “7%, but the number can vary from 1% to 2.75 %”; Utah is “4.70% to 7.95%. Texas population is approximately 26,06 million; Utah 2,855 million, and Tennessee is 6,456 million by 2012; These numbers show that the state of Texas is bigger in size and population than Tennessee and Utah; however the sales taxes revenue is lower han Tennessee, but higher than Utah’s.
Mikesell, J. L. (2010). Fiscal administration: Analysis and applications for the public sector (8th ed.: 2010 custom edition). Mason, OH: Cengage Learning
After tracing the evolution of the provincial-local financial relationship in Canada it has become apparent that the trend, throughout history, has been towards greater Provincial control and in turn less fiscal autonomy for the municipality. There has been an increase (due to demand as well as downloading from the provinces) in the functions and responsibilities of the municipality, as well as the cost of these functions, and a decrease in fiscal resources and revenue sources.
The local governments in Texas are smaller units that form part of the larger state government. These local government extensions act as the administrative branch of the state government. The state of Texas relies mainly on its constitution of 1876 to establish the various local government jurisdictions. Currently, there are 254 counties, 50 cities, 1,100 education districts and 2,393 special districts in the state serving a population of 26 million people (Collier et al.). Each of these branches of the local government has specific roles, which they are supposed to play.
The Texas government is a complex system whose ultimate purpose is to serve its citizens. Oftentimes, its complexity in certain aspects causes problems in its efficiency in serving. The way the Texas Constitution is written, how local governments run, the judicial, legislative, and executive branches’ efficiency, as well as Texas public policy and fiscal policy result in a government that is not set up to best serve its citizens.
The Texas Department of Transportation has, for Fiscal Year 2006, a budget of $7,732,365,130.00.1 This sounds like a substantial sum, seeing as how the previous year’s budget was almost $2 billion dollars less. It is not a substantial sum, however; or, at least, not substantial enough.
Texas the second largest state in the nation has seen a boom in its population over the past decade, which presents both challenges and opportunities for state politicians, such as creating and modifying the state’s current water plan. Texas’ population growth was only second behind California with an increase of 4.3 million people between 2000 and 2010. (Tannahill) The increase in the state’s population growth rate is due to both a natural population increase, whereby live births exceed deaths, and immigration. Compared to the rest of the nation Texas has one of the lowest cost of living expenses in the nation, making it an affordable and attractive option for immigrants from all over the world. Although, most people would see the lower cost of living as a valuable resource, it also has a draw back. Texas which shares a border with Mexico has the largest Stretch of Border between the United States and Mexico. The United States and Mexico border is more 1,900 miles long, in which Texas has more than 1,254 miles...
Arizona is made up of fifteen counties with similar governments required to follow the basic design specified in the state constitution. This presents challenges because of the various sizes and make up of each county. The counties of Arizona follow the oldest pattern of government dividing power between an elected leader and many individually elected officials. The leader of county government is the board of supervisors. They vary in size depending on the size of the county. The rest of the officials include a sheriff, county attorney, recorder, treasurer, assessor, superior court clerk, and a superintendent of schools (McClory, 2001). The traditional form of government has been blamed for many of Arizona’s counties troubles....
When states try to find ways to restrain from non-essential areas, unfunded federal mandates are at the top of the list. These mandates often force state and local governments to spend much more than necessary on everything from medical care to welfare to road building. A complex web of federal programs bind together the tree treasuries of the local, state, and federal government. As much as 25 percent of state budgets now comes from the federal government, and up to 60 percent of some state budgets is spent on joint federal-state programs.
In California, the finance structure of local government gives them more incentives to approve commercial (non-residential) housing development. Cities and counties find fiscal benefits come primarily from the commercial development, such as hotels, restaurants, and retail establishments. The tax revenue received from these establishments could often offset the cost for a local government to provide public services. On the contrary, the affordable housing developments cause more local costs than yielding high tax revenues. Therefore, local governments have the motivation to develop commercial establishments by zoning considerable lands for such purposes. Consequently, many cities and counties have approved their land use planning disproportionately towards commercial
Taxation has always been a major controversy. Just like any major corporation, the government is constantly looking to raise revenue. The easiest and fairest way to do this is by taxing the people. However, how the people will be taxed is always an issue.
However, this has become an issue, and is now the necessity to gain power over certain issues in the community, as well as, the people in it. The bad use of local control has led to a numerous amount of bad policies imposed to Texas residents. Joshua Blank writes, “Local control is an abstract concept likely not to be highly conceptualized among most individuals, and therefore, is really less about attitudes toward the proper locus of government power, and more about the particular issues that local governments are seeking to address” (Blank
Why overall, I think this will be a good thing for Texas. As our population grows this will lure corporates to relocated from other states. This will bring
Texas’ Political ideology centers on Republicanism and Conservatism. This political culture greatly reflects in the state’s taxing system. Texas runs on “laisse faire” motto, meaning that business should left alone. Generally, people with this political ideology do not desire any sort of government intervention (except when it comes to social issues)
State and local governments may be required to contribute partially to programs stemming from nonfederal revenue. When local and state governments have to spend more on these programs less of their own revenue is spent on programs of their choose and