Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Essay on us gun history
History and the introduction of guns to the united states
History on gun control in america
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Essay on us gun history
Position paper rough draft
Since the beginning of the colonies, gun control has been infringed upon our society. Great Britain attempted to ban all muskets which were considered the assault rifle of the time. They then placed restrictions and tried to confiscate all gun powder and prevent it from being shipped to the colonies. The colonists then switched to black powder, which was more unstable and had to be stored in special buildings that were called powder houses. These buildings were made out of thick layers of brick and were cool, dark, and dry. Muskets were considered a very dangerous weapon at the time, yet the colonists sought the rights to own weapons both personally and for their town militias. When America became a nation, the constitution and the bill of rights sought to protect this personal interest and several others.
The second amendment reads: “A well-regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.” This amendment was established to protect the rights of Americans to own weapons. Though the militia is necessary in this, the component that ties over to the present is the right of the people. Muskets were once considered as controversial as assault rifles are today, yet the founding fathers sought to protect the rights of Americans to own them. It is for these reasons that I support Pro-gun laws. As with any law, the line has to be drawn somewhere. Should people be able to own rocket launchers, armor penetrating rounds, or grenades? Probably not. This can be established with common sense and is a reasonable place to draw the line on what Americans can own. Things like assault rifles and high capacity magazines should not be...
... middle of paper ...
... easily getting ahold of these weapons. A national registry of weapons and more strict background checks would definitely help control who owns firearms. Almost all people agree that criminals and mentally ill people should not own firearms. By increasing the security in purchasing firearms and deeper background checks, this issue and the issue of shootings would drastically be reduced while maintaining the right of Americans to own the firearms they want to.
In conclusion, I believe that stricter background checks, mental illness laws, and gun tracking would drastically increase the safety of Americans while protecting the rights of citizens to own weapons like assault rifles, pump action shotguns, and handguns. Stricter mental illness laws are what needs to be focused on rather than ridding Americans of their firearms that are guaranteed by the second amendment.
Violence and crimes are growing in number and affecting American society. By reinforcing background checks we could reduce crimes and limit easy gun access to mentally ill people. The National Instant Criminal Background Check System (NICS) is a database where the names of people that have committed a misdemeanor, are mentally ill or drug abusers is kept to prevent them from attaining guns. Most criminals buy guns from unlicensed sellers at gun shows that don’t do properly background checks through the NICS, making it easier from criminals to purchase firearms. Another problem is missing records or information that was not reported to the background check system. Better background checks could reduce crime and gun violence in America.
Mental health is huge problem in the United States, especially when it allows certain individuals to have access to firearms. Politicians should aim to work more on keeping guns out of the hands of those who seek to harm others, not the law abiding citizens. But this is no easy task. In the CNN article, The real gun problem is mental health, not the NRA, the author, Mel Robbins, points how the mental health problem is to blame , not the gun. Robbins states "Next time there 's a mass shooting, don 't jump to blame the National Rifle Association and lax gun laws. Look first at the shooter and the mental health services he did or didn 't get, and the commitment laws in the state where the shooting took place." (Robbins) Like the first article, the author uses the ethical approach. How can we just sit by and let this keep happening? Many people seek help for mental illness and do not get the proper help that they deserve. If the proper steps were taken, some of these tragedies could have been prevented. The background check system should be a little tougher than it currently is. This is something that many law abiding gun owners agree on. Especially when it comes to the mental health part. Giving a mental health screening to somebody before getting a firearm would almost certainly help. However, no system is perfect. It would have its flaws. Not only is mental
On December 14th, 2012 in Newtown, Connecticut, Adam Lanza shot and killed twenty children, six staff members, and his own mother; this occurred because Adam Lanza was a man with a psychiatric illness with possession of many guns. If Adam Lanza did not have possession of this gun, twenty seven lives could have been saved. There are criminal background checks that take place in order to own a gun, however the government is missing one crucial aspect to it, and that is the medical background check. Even though there are laws against people with mental illnesses having guns, but the government has no way of checking if they have an illness because they do not conduct medical background checks to do so. Mass shootings by people with mental illness are a growing reoccurrence in the United States that needs to be prevented in order to save the lives of American citizens. People with psychiatric history should not be allowed to own guns because there is an increased risk of violence, people with psychiatric illness are not mentally stable, and the United States does not do proper screening and background checks for gun permits.
One of the main reasons why Americans own firearms in their homes is for the protection of themselves and family members. The second amendment of the U.S. Constitution clearly states “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.” This amendment was made for a specific and important reason. That reason was so the citizens of the United States would be able to protect themselves and rebel against the government if it became unconstitutional. This was so American people could have the right to join and fight against bureaucracy if the United States
Over the last 20 years mass shootings have become more common. More and more people are becoming concerned with guns, and the fact they are being used for killing innocent people. Over the past year we’ve had shootings in Orlando, Dallas, and multiple other cities. Many people have come to the conclusion that guns need to go. Others believe there should be background checks for every person who would like to purchase a firearm. Federal laws already prohibit some people from being able to purchase a weapon. The list includes convicted felons, immigrants without legal status, and people diagnosed with certain types of mental illness (“The Fight over Guns,” 2016). Guns should be a ton harder to buy than they are at the
Take a look at the history of our country and the role guns have played in it. According to the second amendment gun ownership is perfectly legal and guaranteed as a right. There were and are good reasons for this, luckily they are still practiced today. Back in the day guns used to be for hunting and, on the occasion self defense. But when the colonists of this country had enough of British rule, they picked up there own personal guns and went to war and the British saw first hand how powerful the rough band of average American gun owners were. Our forefathers knew that the general population if armed would be key in winning the war. And it was.
The second amendment to the US Constitution shows that it is unconstitutional to have complete and total gun control. The second amendment states that “A well-regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.” This means that it is the right of an American citizen, abiding by the constitution, has the right to bear arms. Currently, there are over three hundred and seven billion people residing as American citizens. Within the homes of these Americans, forty five percent have a registered gun in their household. As a diverse nation, there are many reasons why there are guns located within a household. Sixty percent stated the gun is used for protection against int...
Although the Second Amendment prevents the federal government from completely banning guns in America, limited restrictions are allowed on the distribution and possession of firearms. Certain groups of people such as criminals, the mentally unstable, and soldiers dishonorably discharged from the military are prohibited from possessing or interacting with firearms (Flynn). These restrictions are enforced by background checks in some states on both a state and federal level. However, gun laws vary from state to state and are often not thorough enough; the background checks are flawed due to lack of information and misinformation, and guns can easily end up in the hands of criminals and malevolent individuals. The ease of obtaining a firearm in America fosters crime and a dangerous environment. Hence, the Second Amendment should be reinterpreted so that stricter gun laws can be implemented because modern citizens do not require guns, current background checks are flawed, gun...
... a gun several days later. There should be more limits placed on special interest group lobbying efforts, such as the NRA, and allow the citizens of our nation to influence their representative to strengthen our gun laws. In addition, our mental health system needs to be addressed so that we can keep guns out of the hands of the mentally ill, while providing them with needed mental health services. If guns are not a problem, then why are there so many guns per person and why is the United States considered the most violent nation in the industrialized world (15). Our 2nd amendment might guarantee our right to own a gun, but there is nothing that says we can't choose to legislate access to, and the number and types of guns people are allowed to own. I believe specific laws should be passed requiring gun owners to be licensed in the same way car drivers are licensed.
When America was founded in 1776 there were a few reasons behind the Revolution that freed America from Britain. The British wanted to remain in control of this small country because they began to see the potential of business starting there. As the Americans started to see this they realized they were going to have to fight their way to freedom. With growing taxes, growing hostility from british solders, and others laws being enforced, America had enough. But what was the line that was crossed that started this? Gun control. As Britain realized it would be very difficult to enforce laws on a very well armed populous with small amounts of solders, they began to take all the gun powder. This being that all the guns in this time were made to fire with gun powder. This also would begin their attempt to take ammo and guns too. Angered by this, americans revolted, the Boston Tea Party, a...
James Eagan Holmes didn’t let six-year-old Veronica Moser-Sullivan out of that movie theatre that fateful night. Daniel Parmentors mom didn’t get a chance to say goodbye to him because of T.J. Lane. Mary Sherlack’s husband will not set the table for her after Adam Lanza entered her school. The actions of those three shooters were not to cause such small but widespread repercussions for so many other mourning people. They all suffered from various mental illnesses. 79% of recent shootings are attributable to mental illnesses. The U.S. should re-evaluate gun screenings to decrease the odds of another mass shooting by not allowing anyone with any mental or psychological problem to own or possess a firearm. While the Constitution states that everyone has the right to bear arms, the present situation is different from that past, when relations with Great Britain were shaky. Secondly, gun violence is on the rise, with 46 school shootings since 2010, compared with only 40 from 2000 to 2010. Finally, if gun screenings are modified, there will be many jobs available, while contributing to national security at the same time.
Fresh off of their separation from Great Britain, the Founding Fathers realized they could be creating the same beast Britain had become. It was important to them that citizens should be in control of their liberties, avoiding any type of tyranny on the governments behalf. The main issue we are dealing with here is; is it safe for guns to be obtainable by seemingly any adult? The two main purposes for a firearm at the beginning of our country’s existence were protection, and hunting. The early Americans had to use their weapons against wild animal attacks, and to put food on the table for their family. At this point in our evolution as a country, guns are not as necessary as they once were. We no longer need to go hunting to put food on the table, but the right to bear arms includes protecting myself and my family. Thomas Jefferson was an advocate for the second amendment, in a letter to James Madison in 1783 he wrote, "What country can preserve its liberties if their rulers are not warned from time to time that their people preserve the spirit of resistance. Let them take
Guns are always represented as a sigh of terror, violence and insecurity due to which, gun control is always being a significant and controversial issue from both political and self defense point of view. Guns and humans had a shared part of the past history, during that period guns were used for hunting and protection from the invaders. The second amendment of the U. S. constitution even made the guns/arms more debatable on the basis of keeping guns as their right. Their is a no harm keeping a gun for self protection under a proper law and order, which will be regulated by different background, physical check and the awareness of proper use of the guns. These checks will help lower down the statistical data of misuse of firearms and reduce
It is believed that The Founding Fathers thought that the society benefited from guns being in the hands of the people. This way all citizens were able to defend themselves at all times.
Owning gun in the United State has a long history. Before the founding of United State, the early explorers and settlers found this new land that we called American, they hunted for food and protected their own by using guns. And they learned how to use gun when they were teenagers, then they taught their children when they were growing. After the founding of United State, the first law of gun is the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution that was ratified in 1791. The second Amendment was legislated because they knew they could withstand U.K.troops and won the war of independence because of people’s militia owning gun. The Second Amendment states that "well-regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed."