It may seem like Ghost on the Throne by James Romm is just another one of the thousands of books written about the life about Alexander the Great. The fact is it was nearly the exact opposite. Of course, Alexander the Great plays an enormous role in the book, but Ghost on the Throne told the story of the legacy Alexander the Great left behind after his death. In fact, the word “Ghost” in the title of the book refers to Alexander the Great. Throughout the book, Romm told many stories about those who ruled after Alexander the Great and the influence Alexander had on the way those people ruled. This is why the book was given the title “Ghost on the Throne.” James Romm proves the impact Alexander’s legacy had on those once under his command even after he was no longer alive. Ghost on the Throne was a very interesting read and did an excellent job explaining Alexander the Great’s legacy.
Ghost on the Throne began just like I thought any biography would, even though this ended up not being a biography. Romm thoroughly picked apart Alexander the Greats relationships with his wives,...
The book “In the Realm of Hungry Ghosts: Close Encounters with Addiction” was published in the year 2008 on the 12th of February by Knopf Canada. The author of this book is Dr. Gabor Mate who has worked for twelve years in the eastside Vancouver with patients suffering from addiction, mental illness and HIV. He is also a renowned speaker and a bestselling author. He also received the Hubert Evans Prize for Literary Non-Fiction and the 2012 Martin Luther King Humanitarian Award for his work. (….)
Alexander began his military campaign and his rule much where his father left off. Whether or not it was his aim, this created a sense of normality for the men that was part of his father’s regime. Alexander’s position as a warrior-king who stood side-by-side among his men also served to create respect among his peers. Gradually, as Alexander conquered more Persian land, he began to adopt the policies of Persian rulers. Alexander’s change in policy extended beyond just political roles, he gave consideration to the local gods in many of the lands that he conquered. Eventually, Alexander brought people in from the conquered nations to serve under him.
I enjoyed reading Freeman's book and I think that I would use a similar method if I were to write a book about Alexander. He wrote the book as a story describing what the figures may have been thinking and feeling giving the reader a look into the mind of a Macedonian far from home on campaign in asia. Describing battle scenes he make the reader feel the battle describing pain, fear, anger, and more. Rather than a dry and clinical text book approach to the history of Alexander he gives a more visceral approach similar to a fantasy novel. He also avoids using esoteric and foreign language making the book easy, as well as enjoyable, to read while still accurately conveying the facts and possibilities of Alexander's campaign across Asia.
Book Review of King Leopold's Ghost, by Adam Hochschild What some have considered to be the first international scandal of the modern era took place in the Congo from 1890 until 1910. King Leopold II of Belgium was at the head of this so-called scandal. Although Europe and the rest of the world seemed to have forgotten the victims of these crimes, there is a considerable amount of material to use when attempting to recreate the horror that took place in Leopold's Congo. This is exactly what Adam Hochschild is attempting to do by writing this book. By using the written words of mostly Europeans and Americans, which creates a distorted view of history, he wants to show that the Holocaust type event that took place in the Congo is something that should never be forgotten in our history.
This ghost story was told by a nineteen-year-old Caucasian student at the University of Maryland. She is from the Baltimore Metro Area and lives with her mother and younger sister. I decided to approach her since she is a notorious lover of ghost stories and folklore. While we were hanging out with friends, I asked her to tell me a ghost story. As soon as I asked, her eyes lit up and she took me to the side, out of earshot of our friends. With great energy and enthusiastic facial expressions, she proceeded to tell me the following story about the Civil War site of the Battle of Gettysburg:
For this month’s book report I read a book called ‘Emer’s Ghost’ by Catherine Sefton. This book was about a girl named Emer who lives in Northern Ireland. She knows a man named Mr.Bannon who has a hidey-hole where he keeps things, and it is a very secret place. Emer finds a wooden doll that is old and worn, and noticed that there was something strange about the doll when she picked it up. That night when she went to sleep, she awoke only to find a ghost of a young girl. Emer was frightened but she wanted to help the girl. The girl disappeared and when Emer tried to tell her sister, Breige, she only laughed and made fun of Emer. The same thing happened a few days later. Emer’s other sister, Kathleen, wanted to go to the fortune teller, so Emer went along with her. When they arrived the fortune teller first told Kathleen’s future. Then when she got to tell Emer’s, all the fortune teller did was to look into Emer’s eyes for a very long time. Then the fortune teller gave Emer a drawing and asked her if it looked familiar. At this time Emer had never seen it before, so the fortune teller told her to keep it. Later on in the book, Emer sees the drawing on the window and wonders what it means. Kathleen’s friend was digging around a church that had been burned down a long time ago by the Vikings when they were looking for a chalice. Finally Emer sees the ghost again and sees the drawing. She finally knew what the drawing meant; it was a map of the hidey-hole! Emer and Breige go into the hidey hole and discover that the wall was where the roof of the hidey-hole had caved in. Emer and Breige frantically dug through the stones and crawled through to the other side, and then the wall collapsed. Emer was choking and thought she was going to die, but she was able to crawl out of the hole. She then realized that Breige was still in there, so she went and dug Breige out, but Breige wasn’t breathing! Finally Breige started breathing and Emer found the chalice. All of the town was happy and the ghost never bothered Emer again.
Power is a theme used by Shakespeare throughout the play Macbeth. The plot involves Macbeth trying to gain more power. Lady Macbeth tries to convince Macbeth to kill Duncan so that he will become king in his place. Macbeth also is persuaded to kill anyone who threatens his chances of being king, including Banquo. Power is used by certain characters in the play to influence others. One such character is Lady Macbeth. In the beginning of the play, she is a strong-willed character. She takes on the role of a dominant male. She has great influence over her husband, who appears to be weaker than she is. It is her influence that convinces Macbeth to murder Duncan. Lady Macbeth is the dominant partner at the beginning of the play, she persuades Macbeth to achieve his goal, and she plans the murder of Duncan.
In the book, The Serpent’s Shadow, by Rick Riordan is a good book. The plot of the story is Carter, Sadie and the House of Life are trying to stop evil traitors that obey Apophis, an embodiment of Chaos, to release Apophis from his prison. Carter and Sadie in the book are traveling towards Thoth, the god of knowledge in Cairo, Egypt to learn a spell to stop Apophis from rising. There are two main characters in this book. One main character is Sadie and the other one is carter. They are brothers and sisters. I would be friend with both of them because they are both kind, funny and trustworthy. They are both kind because they are nice to everyone, including their enemies. In the
Have you heard of a man named Alexander the Great, the famous historical figure? There are many amazing stories about him explaining the courageous things he had accomplished. However, if you learn more about him and his accomplishments you will soon realized the real person Alexander was. Alexander the Great, ruler of his empire was in fact not great as his title states. The definition of great is a person who shows concern for others, has leadership and shows intelligence. Alexander didn’t show any of these characteristics therefore he doesn’t deserve the title of “great”.
In the countries who believed Alexander was the son of the devil or the devil himself, will say he is not ‘great’ but a demon who did evil. The countries who were on his side would say he was the greatest conqueror to live. He began as a Macedonian cavalry commander at eighteen, king of Macedonia at twenty, conqueror of Persia at twenty-six and explorer of India at thirty [Foner and Garraty]. The amount of large scale accomplishments he managed to finish in a span of six years is astonishing. Alexander’s tomb was the largest tourist attraction in the ancient world. The tomb was even visited by Julius Caesar, Pompey, Caligula, and Augustus. Alexander the Great’s accomplishments set a bar in which provided a standard that all other leaders would match their careers too. Many leaders after Alexander could not reach the standard left by him [Foner and
Fundamentally, the historical context relating to the document that influenced Plutarch to establish such a manuscript stems from his aspiratioFundamentally, the historical context relating to the document that influenced Plutarch to establish such a manuscript stems from his aspiration to accurately portray Alexander the Great’s underlying character, conduct, strengths, shortcomings and to leave behind a applicable historical reference for the future so that others could comprehend Alexander’s overall nature as an individual who is widely recognized. Plutarch’s lives or biography of Alexander was designed to encourage mutual reverence for Greek and Roman culture or the renowned individuals that greatly influence both cultures, in a series of biographies highlighting those individuals’ common virtues and vices. Plutarch was more concerned with writing biography than history, concentrating his efforts on the meritorious actions of his subjects as examples of noble behavior and not so much on the times in which they lived. He wanted Greeks and Romans alike to recognize the tremendous legacy, which they had inherited from the great men of the past that facilitated in profoundly influencing the future through their actions such as Alexander the Great. His aim was therefore clearly didactic. History, for Plutarch, has to do with the morals of these notorious historical figures, in which great individuals rise and fall by their strengths and weaknesses. His lives tend to be anecdotal and to focus on revealing stories.
Wrap-Up: Lady Macbeth’s influence on Macbeth, as well as Duncan’s murder, show Macbeth’s desire to rise himself and his wife to power.
a dull grey colour as if it had lost the will to live and stopped
ATG: After my fathers’ death it was not easy for me to take over the throne, because there was always another heir that also wanted to take that place. During that time everyone would do anything to take over the throne. I was one of them, so I killed my opponents. I executed my cousin Amyntas IV and two Macedonian princes. I did not killed my half-brother because he was mentally disabled, so it was hard for him to take my fathers’ place as the king of Macedonia, so he was not an obstacle for me to remain in power.