Zen Buddhism: Existence Or Non-Violence?

1883 Words4 Pages

Buddhism was created in approximately 5000 BC by a man named Siddhartha Gautama, or more commonly known as the Buddha. Since the origin of Buddhism’s existence, the central focus has been the elimination of suffering through self-evaluation and meditation. The Buddha himself identified one of the primary factors of suffering as violence. Hence, one of the most central teachings of Buddhism is the importance of practicing non-violence. It is only through this practice, that one can extend the Buddhist understanding beyond one’s self (Green). The Buddha explained this as follows, “All fear violence, all are afraid of death. Seeing the similarity to oneself, one should not use violence or have it used.” This Buddhist teaching was maintained …show more content…

The samurais were known for two things, being incredibly violent and destructive, as well as being very dedicated followers of Zen Buddhism. This forces the question, how was Buddhism altered in order to allow such violent actions among the samurai warriors? It seems that there are two logical reasons for this odd correlation. The first method of reasoning suggests that Buddhism was largely twisted by the Japanese followers, in order to create Zen Buddhism, which would better fit their violent culture of the time period. Within this argument it can be seen how Zen Buddhism offered the samurai class with two forms of coping mechanisms to combat the fears that accompany their cast, provided those who practiced it an elevated understanding of their own being, and due to its universal nature, was able to be applied to the samurai’s violent lifestyle. The second theory is a much more positive one, suggesting that the samurai understood Buddhism in such a way that it recognized their violence as a benefit to mankind. This theory follows more closely to Indian Buddhism by holding to the obligation to eliminate suffering from the …show more content…

Buddhism’s transition to a violent setting in Japan can be accredited to Zen’s very unique universal nature. It must be remembered that Zen is just the word for meditation, so as long as the same methods of meditation are used to pursue personal enlightenment, the “Zen techniques are compatible with other faiths” (BBC). In addition, Zen Buddhism is a sect of Buddhism in which, the dharma (cosmic order) is not spread through words or writing, but through action (Class Lecture, 4/18/18). This unspoken characteristic adds to the universality that is present within the tradition by preventing the typical limits imposed on religious ideologies. There is no book or monk that directly describes what enlightenment entails, and so the practice of Zen can have different results based on the context in which it is practiced. If one practices meditation in order embrace love, they will come to better understand love. If it is intended to promote submission to the universe or God, then the individual will learn to submit. Likewise, if it is practiced in order to come to peace with the violence of one’s self, then that too will come of

Open Document