Winston Churchill: The Most Powerful Weapon For Britain

1215 Words3 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Why was winston churchill such an important leader during wwii

Winston Churchill was said to be possibly Britain’s most powerful weapon against Hitler’s Germany. He succeeded Neville Chamberlain as prime minister of England who had become known for the policy of appeasement after the Munich Conference. Churchill was also a wonderful orator, and he could rally and persuade the people. In my opinion, there are several reasons that Churchill was known as the most powerful weapon for Britain to fight against Hitler and all he stood for. First of all, I think the statement is meant to say that no British gun, airplane, or tank was going to be the thing to beat Hitler and his army. After all, all of these things are useless if no one is there to instruct on how to use them or when to use them. It is stating that the only weapon that was going to be powerful enough to challenge Germany was none other than Winston Churchill. In class when we looked at his picture, most people saw a grumpy, serious old man that was extremely tough and dedicated to his country. This is probably what most people also saw. The first reason that I think he was initially known as such a great …show more content…

Under these terms, neither nation could attack one another. However, it was not an alliance so they would not help each other. Both nations were somewhat afraid of each other at the time, so they both needed reassurance and Stalin needed time to rebuild the army that he had destroyed in the Purge of the Red Army. Finally, on June 22nd of 1941, Hitler set into motion Operation Barbarossa. This was the plan that the Germans had created for when they invaded the USSR. Even though Germans believed it would be a quick war over the territory, they were proved wrong by the Russians who were going to hold their ground no matter what. The fight was not ending as the months rolled by. Unfortunately as times change, instead of learning from it, history simply seems to keep repeating its

Show More
Related

  • Alicia My Story, Book Summary

    1341 Words  | 3 Pages

    was taken away shortly after the Russians had moved out and the Germans began to

    Read More

  • Modern Society: Mass Effects In Modern Life, 1925

    1103 Words  | 3 Pages

    He showed real beneficial points of production which I agreed how production could change the population especially changing the variety of working, but I criticized on the disadvantages of mass production he mentioned. This is because one company could offer more money to their people which having money is the aim of most of us, so when a place offer money, it has more beneficial rather than disadvantages. However, Churchill described the main differences of WWI and previous wars which were significant points because it is true that a lot of damages were caused in WWI that destroyed most people’s lives, and the cause of the wars is not indicated in any places. Also, it told the way of how Generals and armies are not heroes which I precisely disagree his point because people fight for their families and protect them from enemies. That’s why they need to fight and are seen as heroes but not heroes of their country, heroes of their family. In addition, he also described future wars which WWI had recently ended in his time, but he predicted to have another war which will be much cruel. It was true because WWII happened and caused more damages to the world; many women and children died with it. This was an extraordinary prediction because how someone can predict the future and become reality? However, as he mentioned peace was in people’s heart and was more important than having wars as

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Of Joseph Stalin

    758 Words  | 2 Pages

    This meant that neither Germany, nor the Soviet Union, would invade the other country. This pact was made because the USSR wanted to remain at peace with Germany and secure time to build up their military, however, the pact did not last long (“Nonaggression Pact”). On June 22, 1941, Germany attacked the Soviet Union without provocation. This lead the Soviet Union to join the Allied side of the fight. They were accompanied by the United States, United Kingdom, France, and many others. Although Stalin had led his country into joining the Allies, there were always underlying tensions between the countries.

    Read More

  • Winston Churchill's Adaptive Leadership

    504 Words  | 2 Pages

    He had a goal in his mind and he was going to do whatever it took to accomplish that goal. “I have nothing to offer but blood, toil, tears and sweat.” He was driven to save the British Isles from the hand of Hitler. His internal motivation to save his country is like a bulldog they may be stubborn and arrogant, but will stop at nothing to protect his family. He was key in getting the U.S. involved in World War II and securing aid from the U.S in the lend Lease Act which provided the good need to fight a war like gun, planes, and other supplies ammunition to Britain, Russia, and China. If Winston Churchill failed in this time period, Britain would have certainly fall, but the entire World was at risk of falling. Mr. Churchill was only madly driven; he was as tough as they

    Read More

  • The Soviet Union and Nazi Germany in the 1930s as Totalitarian States

    1273 Words  | 3 Pages

    In fact, he just wanted to fish in troubled water over the hostility between Nazi Germany and the western democratic countries. In 1939 he signed the Nazi-Soviet Non-Aggression Pact, intending to get back the three Baltic States. Facing the imminent Nazi threat, moreover, Stalin gave up the Marxist idea of internationalism but stirred up enthusiasm of Russian nationalism at home. Hence, both aimed at territorial expansion.

    Read More

  • Who is Responsible for Causing World War I?

    1317 Words  | 3 Pages

    ... was spread too thin. Germany mistook Russian advancement as a serious threat, when in actuality, it turned out to be poorly supplied and may have been easily defeated with a full German force that was expected to encounter it. This retreat of the Germans led to the French being able to gain a much more even battle on the western front, which was where the majority of the war was to be fought. Thus, the war that could have ended in only three weeks lasted for over four years.

    Read More

  • Winston Churchill: A Life of Resilience and Achievement

    2084 Words  | 5 Pages

    Winston Churchill was born unexpectedly at Blenheim Palace, a country house in Woodstock, Oxfordshire. He was the youngest son of Randolph Churchill and Jennie Churchill. Addison stated, “Winston’s father, Lord Randolph Churchill, was a younger son of the seventh duke of Marlborough, a substantial Tory statesman who had held office under Disraeli” (Addison 8). His father was a successful man. Addison added, “His mother, Jennie Churchill, was the daughter of a New York financier, Leonard Jerome, and his wife Clara” (Addison 7). He did not spend much time with his parents. Addison comments, “Neither of Churchill’s parents lacked affection for Winston, but they saw little of him and he felt profoundly neglected” (Addison 11). His parents were pushy and did not think much of him. Winston Churchill had two brothers, one of which was a bad person and the other was calm. The author describes the oldest brother, George, by stating, “He scandalized contemporaries with his adulterous affairs, sold off the Blenheim art collection, and died in his laboratory at Blenheim ‘with a terrible expression on his face” (Addison 9). Winston Churchill’s oldest brother had a bad history that he was known for. Winston Churchill had a wife name Clementine Hozier. He proposed to his wife at Blenheim Palace and they had five children. Clementine Hozier supported him through all of his fights and elections. However, Winston Churchill was a big achiever during his lifetime. He won the Nobel Peace Prize for Literature in 1953. He achieved many goals, such as being a soldier, politician, prime minister and writer. Winston Churchill knew that he was capable of failing and when he did, he did not let that stop him from being successful. He was one of the world’s ...

    Read More

  • Winston Churchill: We Shall Fight on the Beaches

    930 Words  | 2 Pages

    As explained before, this speech was able to significantly restore and raise morale. It prepared Britain for its ‘Darkest Hour’ and how long of a road it would be. This is considered one of Churchill’s finest speeches to this day and how it was so effective amongst the British people. It proved that a valiant defense and an effective leadership could overcome a significantly larger army. Churchill’s speech was not in vain. The blitzkrieg on Britain was a strategic German failure and the consistent bombing of London was able to in some cases improve morale with the British people and was able to show how resilient the island nation can be. For once, Nazi Germany suffered its first major defeat blazing a war trail throughout Europe.

    Read More

  • Winston Churchill as Man of the Twentieth Century

    3041 Words  | 7 Pages

    During the twentieth century, there were many people, some well known and others not so well known, who contributed to society in one way or another. When determining which one of these people was the biggest contributor to society during the twentieth century, and, therefore, the person of the twentieth century, their lives as a whole should be taken into consideration. In addition to contributing much to society in various ways, the best candidate for person of the century should also have had struggles and experiences that they overcame or went through and from which they learned. Winston Churchill is the person who contributed the most to society during the twentieth century and made it what it is today.

    Read More

  • Why Stalin Built The Iron Curtain

    661 Words  | 2 Pages

    Stalin did not trust the West, Britain and USA. because he remembered they had invaded Russia in 1919 and had ignored Stalin's appeal for a second front. Stalin was convinced they wanted the USSR to destroy itself when fighting Germany. At the end of the war, the Allies met at Yalta and later Potsdam.... ...

    Read More

  • The Duel

    1039 Words  | 3 Pages

    Of course, the threat of violence was always present but Hitler was smart enough that he could scare his enemies enough that they would not want to engage in combat. Once actually forced to fight, Hitler still dominated and he could have very possibly won the war if not for that one fatal mistake he made by hesitating in his plans against the English. I think it is important that Lukacs makes sure to get this message across because some people choose to ignore this truth due to the devastating outcomes that would have resulted if Hitler succeeded. The major point presented by Lukacs concerning the difference between Hitler and Churchill has to do with nationalim versus patriotism. Lukacs describes Hitler as a nationalist and Churchill as a patriot. He describes Hitler as a man of ideas and Churchill as a of man principles, because Churchill's ideas changed throughout the war while Hitler tended to think that his ideas were principles.

    Read More

  • The History of Stalingrad

    4706 Words  | 10 Pages

    This paper is not meant to be a military history of the battle; I am not qualified to offer such an account. It is also not an examination of why Russia won (and Germany lost). The goal of this paper is to explain why this particular conflict, fought at this particular point in time, and in this particular place became the defining moment of World War II.

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast Fdr And Stalin

    612 Words  | 2 Pages

    Winston Churchill was a British prime minister from 1940-1945. Churchill was a statesman, orator, and author, most importantly he was a great leader. He is best remembered for successfully leading Britain through World War II. He held authentic, and inspiring speeches in attempt to keep his country’s spirits up. In which he succeeded.

    Read More

  • ‘We Shall Fight on the Beaches’- A Rhetorical Analysis

    1568 Words  | 4 Pages

    By examining Churchill’s use of rhetoric we can see what exactly made him such a great leader. His speeches were able to do more damage to the Nazis than any bomb could have done because his language rallied the people together. His use of repetition proved his points and reminded the country of what mattered most. His descriptive words helped build up anger against the Nazi rule and persuade everyone to pull through the tough times. He used pronouns in such a way that it would personalize everything and help unify his country. Through his unique use of words Churchill was able to convince many that if they could just endure that they would at last be victorious (Bungay).

    Read More

  • Winston Churchill: The Great Communicator

    1031 Words  | 3 Pages

    Winston Churchill was perhaps one of the greatest public speakers in history. Some of the best speeches have come from being in life or death situations, Winston was known best for this. His small sound clips like, “this was their finest hour”, and “this is not the end. It is not even the beginning of the end. But it is, perhaps, the end of the beginning”, encourage his troops and his people that they will win this war and will overcome the greatest odds. Although Churchill told many speeches, his speech on June 18, 1940 showed the most emotion and courage of any other speech he told. In this speech he explained that the war in France is over and the war in Britain would begin. He said that if we fail then the world sink into an abyss. This emotion that he shows would give Britain hope, courage and most of all determination.

    Read More

More about Winston Churchill: The Most Powerful Weapon For Britain

Open Document