William Golding's Lord Of The Flies Argument Essay

456 Words1 Page

Arguments on how to govern society has always been apart of human history. In Lord of the Flies by William Golding, he demonstrates how one society from a boy named Jack gains supremacy from another boy’s society named Ralph. Ralph’s society is more civil, lawful, and democratic while Jack’s society is more savage like and more of a dictatorship. In Lord of the Flies by William Golding, he uses foreshadowing, symbolism, and allegory to convey the reasons why Jack gains supremacy over Ralph. Jack likes to govern in a savage way. He likes to hunt, being savage like, and killing things. In the text it states, “ ‘The rules!’ shouted Ralph. ‘You're breaking the rules!’ ‘Who cares?’... ‘Bollocks to the rules! We're strong--we hunt! If there's a beast, we'll hunt it down!’” (Golding 91). This demonstrates that Jack doesn’t want to follow the rules and just wants to do whatever he wants and wants to hunt and kill things. The boys slowly look at Jack for leadership. …show more content…

Ralph likes to enforce the rules and get things done and likes to establish rules. In the text it states, “‘And another thing. We can’t have everybody talking at once. We’ll have to have ’Hands up’ like at school.’ He held the conch before his face and glanced around the mouth. ‘Then I’ll give him the conch.’ ‘Conch?’ ‘That’s what this shell’s called. I’ll give the conch to the next person to speak. He can hold it when he’s speaking.’... ‘And he won’t be interrupted: Except by me’” (Golding 33). This demonstrates that Ralph likes make and enforce the rules and likes to have order. Ralph likes to be as civil as possible and doesn’t like the boys acting like

Open Document